2024 U.S. Presidential Election Thread

[Foxmulder]

That’s the problem with some of y’all act like whatever right wingers say voters are just gonna automatically agree with. Dude posting a bunch of right wing nut job tweets as proof that independents and swing voters are going to be swayed by Trump getting shot at.

 

[King Kreole]

MAGA is going to suck Trump dikk regardless. What matters is the voters who could have been swayed by the assassination attempt. The fact that the shooter was a pro gun Nazi doesn’t help Trump.

It's not necessarily about swaying voters to go from one candidate to the other, it's about a media/messaging environment that will affect or suppress turnout. If people believe it's a choice between Democracy vs Fascism then they're more likely to tune in and vote as opposed to a choice between two old men, one of which survived an assassination attempt.

 

[Outlaw]

It's not necessarily about swaying voters to go from one candidate to the other, it's about a media/messaging environment that will affect or suppress turnout. If people believe it's a choice between Democracy vs Fascism then they're more likely to tune in and vote as opposed to a choice between two old men, one of which survived an assassination attempt.

All I’m saying is the democratic messaging hasn’t been set yet. Biden is already subbing Trump that it’s his fault he doesn’t want gun control.

 

[mitter]

MAGA is going to suck Trump dikk regardless. What matters is the voters who could have been swayed by the assassination attempt. The fact that the shooter was a pro gun Nazi doesn’t help Trump.

The people who have not made up their minds yet are largely people who don’t pay much attention. They are not going to look into things carefully. If someone made an attempt on Trump’s life, the first explanation that comes to mind is that it was someone from “the other side.”

 

[wire28]

That’s the problem with some of y’all act like whatever right wingers say voters are just gonna automatically agree with. Dude posting a bunch of right wing nut job tweets as proof that independents and swing voters are going to be swayed by Trump getting shot at.

They’ve been warped into only seeing things through a prism the size of pinhole. They’ve been calling people blue MAGA and I don’t know if there is a (respectful) term that can be used for them.

 

[King Kreole]

That’s the problem with some of y’all act like whatever right wingers say voters are just gonna automatically agree with. Dude posting a bunch of right wing nut job tweets as proof that independents and swing voters are going to be swayed by Trump getting shot at.

My whole point is that Democrats need to provide a strong counter message, not rely on your presumption that everyone will just automatically agree with you that a Presidential candidate assassination attempt is no biggie and continue on business as usual. Right now Democrats are running the sympathy with the devil message. The average voter isn't going to be motivated to rally against Trump by hearing this.

 

[Outlaw]

The people who have not made up their minds yet are largely people who don’t pay much attention. They are not going to look into things carefully. If someone made an attempt on Trump’s life, the first explanation that comes to mind is that it was someone from “the other side.”

Yes then those same people will hear it was a right wing Nazi and think Trump brought this upon himself.

How is it Biden fault that a 20 year old radicalized Nazi with an assault rifle shot the orange fukk when democrats want gun control? Your arrogance underestimates the intelligence of the average voter

 

[mitter]

So independents going "Project 2025 will be the end of our democracy but Trump got shot so I'm voting for it" ?

Since when do people think logically and carefully?

Any violence directed towards Trump and the republicans undercuts the Dems’ core message that Trump and his followers are a threat to democracy who will resort to violence to impose their will.

To the typical dumbass independent who can’t make up his mind, we are back at “both sides are doing it.”

 

[Liu Kang]

The Democratic response to the shooting reveals an inherent contradiction in their core election message. You cannot credibly claim this man represents an existential threat to the very fabric of this country yet wish him a speedy recovery and be grateful that he's doing well. You either don't believe all the American Fascism talk you've been fearmongering about (like many Dems will admit to behind the scenes), or you prefer a slow, orderly, civil descent into fascism to the alternative of fighting to stop it by any means necessary. Either way, Republicans will use this shooting to advance the "left wing radicals activated by Biden are out of control and the real violent threat to this country" while Centrists will "both sides are out of control" this which only benefits the actually deranged far-right. Biden pulling ads and communication is only ceding space to the argument that his anti-Trump rhetoric caused this. This is a disaster for the anti-fascist movement in this country.

Not at all.

Dems can say Trump is an existential threat while not wanting him dead simply because they'd want him tried. If they'd justify killing a political opponent, they would literally justify opponents killing them as well as a slippery slope.

They are actually in line with their messaging as justice should punish Trump, not a loony 20 yo.

 

[mitter]

Yes then those same people will hear it was a right wing Nazi and think Trump brought this upon himself.

How is it Biden fault that a 20 year old radicalized Nazi with an assault rifle shot the orange fukk when democrats want gun control? Your arrogance underestimates the intelligence of the average voter

They will hear some people say it was a right wing Nazi, and they will hear some people say it was a left wing commie.

You are right in that I think I think the average voter is a dumbass who does not seek out facts or pay much attention or think about things rationally and carefully.

 

[AVXL]

I completely agree that Democrats need to redirect the negative energy to Trump and accurately portray him as the progenitor of this violence and chaos, I was saying this last night, but they've already shown they're unwilling to. Instead we're getting "Thoughts and prayers to the President's family."

Do you honestly believe that in a scenario where a former President was almost assassinated that now would be the time to maintain the status quo of political rhetoric?

 

[Liu Kang]

Since when do people think logically and carefully?

Any violence directed towards Trump and the republicans undercuts the Dems’ core message that Trump and his followers are a threat to democracy who will resort to violence to impose their will.

To the typical dumbass independent who can’t make up his mind, we are back at “both sides are doing it.”

That's literally what just happened though.

The shooter is a registered Republican who was wearing a 2A/gun nut youtuber T-shirt. How would they come to the conclusion of "both sides" from this ?

 

[Worthless Loser]

If Trump is viewed as just another normal, legitimate electoral opponent in a routine Presidential election, then sure, best wishes, speedy recovery, hope he gets back on his feet and gives us a good contest. But then you have to drop the American fascism playbook. You simply cannot have it both ways.

The reason deranged MAGA freaks would be crowing if this happened to Biden is because they actually believe that Democrats are pedophile groomers who are destroying the country, so they respond like it. They believe this is an existential fight, Democrats evidently do not.



And the right are already picking on this dissonance to shut down the main Democratic message:





Either fight back or concede.

If Dems did act like that these same people would be attacking them for not showing any respect.

 

[King Kreole]

Not at all.

Dems can say Trump is an existential threat while not wanting him dead simply because they'd want him tried. If they'd justify killing a political opponent, they would literally justify opponents killing them as well as a slippery slope.

They are actually in line with their messaging as justice should punish Trump, not a loony 20 yo.

No one here is saying the Dems should say "I'm glad he was shot and I wish he died!"

I'm asking them to not wish for a speedy recovery and best wishes to the man they're saying is trying to end American Democracy. Those two sentiments are not in line at all. The Democrats did not send this guy to shoot Trump, so why would they need to justify killing a political opponent. They aren't responsible for this shooter.

There's a massive gap between saying you want Trump dead and saying you wish he has a quick and full recovery, and inside of that gap exists the correct response:

“Today we saw the result of Donald Trump’s direct assault on our Democracy and the blowback that his increasing mainstreaming of political violence has brought to our lives.

In order to prevent violence like this from spreading from Trump to the rest of American life, we must ensure he is defeated at the ballot box in November.”

 

[mitter]

That's literally what just happened though.

The shooter is a registered Republican who was wearing a 2A/gun nut youtuber T-shirt. How would they come to the conclusion of "both sides" from this ?

Do you think facts matter in America? The right can just keep repeating that he was an antifa commie liberal and a very large proportion of the population will buy it.

The violence was directed towards Trump, and that is enough for a frighteningly large number of people to conclude it must have come from “the other side.”