WHO WINS?


  • Total voters
    275

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
100,323
Reputation
13,416
Daps
293,131
Reppin
NULL
Okay, well let’s compare the evils.

Trump administration: Moves embassy to Jerusalem and vows to continue genocide.

Biden Administration: Facilitates the genocide resulting in 40,000 people and ethnic cleansing of millions.
no, HAMAS facilitated the fukking war. NOT JOE BIDEN

jesus christ
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
15,093
Reputation
4,423
Daps
42,198
Now show a graph that shows support for an arms embargo. Arms embargo and ceasefire and two different asks
If a politician can't connect the dots for their voters between a ceasefire the voters desire and an arms embargo on the side committing the overwhelming majority of the attacks, then they're one of the worst political messengers of all time and should not be running.
 

AquaCityBoy

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
41,970
Reputation
9,292
Daps
186,405
Reppin
NULL
Now show a graph that shows support for an arms embargo. Arms embargo and ceasefire and two different asks
They're really not, but here you go:




A significant share of Democrats and independent voters in pivotal swing states Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Arizona are more likely to vote for the Democratic presidential nominee (presumptively Kamala Harris) if said nominee pledges support for an arms embargo to Israel, and if President Joe Biden secures a permanent ceasefire in Gaza. The findings come in new polling commissioned by the Institute for Middle Eastern Understanding Policy Project and conducted by polling firm YouGov.

In Pennsylvania, 34% of respondents said they would be more likely to vote for the Democratic nominee if the nominee vowed to withhold weapons to Israel, compared to 7% who said they would be less likely. The rest said it would make no difference. In Arizona, 35% said they’d be more likely, while 5% would be less likely. And in Georgia, 39% said they’d be more likely, also compared to 5% who would be less likely.


Similar results were found when respondents were asked separately if they were more or less likely to vote for the Democratic nominee if Biden called for an end to US.-funded weapons to Israel or if the US president secured a ceasefire.

The results were particularly stark when looking at responses by those who voted for Biden in 2020 and are currently undecided. In Pennsylvania, 57% of such voters said they’d be more likely to support the Democratic nominee if they pledged to withhold additional weapons to Israel for committing human rights abuses; in Arizona, 44% said the same; in Georgia, 34% said so.

From July 25 through August 9, pollsters asked voters if and how the Democratic nominee pledging "to withhold more weapons to Israel for committing human rights abuses against Palestinian civilians" would impact their vote. In Arizona, 35% said they would be more likely to vote for her, versus 5% who said they would be less likely. The figures were similar in Georgia (39% versus 5%) and Pennsylvania (34% versus 7%).

Even bigger shares of voters said they would be more likely to support her in November if President Joe Biden—who dropped out of the race and passed the torch to Harris last month—secured a permanent cease-fire in Gaza. In Arizona, 41% said they would be more likely to vote for her, versus 2% who said they would be less likely. In both Georgia and Pennsylvania, it was 44% versus 2%.

"If the Democrats want Vice President Harris to be the strongest nominee possible going into November, then they should be demanding that President Biden stop the flow of weapons to Israel and secure a permanent cease-fire immediately."

"Across all three states, 80% or more of Democrats and Independents support a permanent cease-fire and 60% or more disapprove of more weapons to Israel," the IMEU Policy Project said in a social media thread sharing more results from the poll. "About a quarter of those surveyed across these states say the violence in Gaza will sway how they vote."

The group added that "57% of Arizonans surveyed say U.S. support for Israel has been 'too much' versus just 2% who say it has not been enough. 48% of Pennsylvanians say it has been too much versus 3% who say not enough, and 50% of Georgians say it has been too much versus 2% who say it has not been enough."


 

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
4,895
Reputation
156
Daps
15,078
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
If a politician can't connect the dots for their voters between a ceasefire the voters desire and an arms embargo on the side committing the overwhelming majority of the attacks, then they're one of the worst political messengers of all time and should not be running.
Not true at all. She’s already calling for a ceasefire. Not getting any credit for it. If she calls for an arms embargo the entire corporate media apparatus, some AIPAC Dems and the Trump campaign would be calling Kamala an anti-Semite and pro Hamas/Iran. It would be the kiss of death
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
100,323
Reputation
13,416
Daps
293,131
Reppin
NULL
It’s going to get ugly if she loses. Worse than 2016.
it's obviously unfair, but the reality is if kamala loses, she'll set women in politics back about 40 years

if donald trump really wins two terms, off of beating the only two female nominees ever, i'm not voting for a woman in a primary again for the rest of my life :dead:
 
Last edited:

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
4,895
Reputation
156
Daps
15,078
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
They're really not, but here you go:










According to your numbers about 50% are for an arms embargo. You’re proving my point, she would take a political hit for calling for one
 
Top