IAMDetroit
"Yall Nig*as"
He not wrong tho
2. Being told he had to pay 250,000K to keep his patent active. Check.
In conclusion, his idea was STOLEN.
False. It wouldn't be on the site at all cac. Current status, "inactive", meaning it was active at one point. This is 15 years ago.That's a lie. His patent was never active in the first place. You can scroll down to the bottom, "legal actions", and see that the granting of the patent was never given and he didn't even respond to the initial request from the patent office.
Give me a logical breakdown of the questions I asked you.It's just a vague description of what VR is with a random arbitrary setup and zero technical information.
You know you fukked up right?If anyone wants to know how seriously to take a Terrence Howard patent....besides trying to patent the general idea of VR, he had also tried to patent diamond jewelry:
US20110072851A1 - Diamond jewelry - Google Patents
A diamond band made from solid diamond can be worn on a body part. Various pieces of jewelry are made from a diamond such as a plate of chemical vapor deposition formed diamond.patents.google.com
I'm not exaggerating......it's a literal patent application for "diamond jewelry". Not a specific type of diamond jewelry, but diamond jewelry in general.
Notice that patent has the exact same status as the VR patent - application discontinued because he never responded to the office action.
False. It wouldn't be on the site at all cac. Current status, "inactive", meaning it was active at one point. This is 15 years ago.
You stated that they only give citations because they have to...Why did they HAVE to if, according to you, the idea is bullshyt? In fact, you claim Terrence Howard never had a patent to begin with! Which, unknowingly to you (since you exposed yourself to being a dumb ass white boy) KILLS YOUR ARGUMENT EVEN FURTHER. His patent should be cited at all in that case, it shouldn't even still be on the site!
Just like a cac to believe a celebrity would take time out of their day to debate you.At this point I'm pretty sure @Doomsday is Terrence Howard himself.
Wrong. They have two different statuses. Stop deflecting cac.It says the APPLICATION went inactive. Granted status is nowhere on there.
His diamond jewelry patent has the exact same status.
Yeah, that's why the general term 'diamond jewelry' (billion-dollar industry) only has two citations.If you actually read his patent or any of the patents that are marked in the citations, you'd see that numerous mere "applications" are cited before the patent is ever granted. Since it takes years to grant many patents,
it merely means you're discussing it.
You know you fukked up right?
The status of that patent says, "abandoned". The status of the VR patent says, "inactive". You ONCE AGAIN proved Terrence Howard RIGHT! You fukkin' dumbass white boy! You just proved that the VR patent was active at one point, which means they did in fact price him out of a billion-dollar idea.
You know you fukked up right?
The status of that patent says, "abandoned". The status of the VR patent says, "inactive". You ONCE AGAIN proved Terrence Howard RIGHT! You fukkin' dumbass white boy! You just proved that the VR patent was active at one point, which means they did in fact price him out of a billion-dollar idea.
What is an Abandoned Patent?
ByNoah AdamJune 20, 2020
An abandoned patent is one where the patent application is no longer pending because the applicant has either failed to reply to a USPTO office action or the applicant has expressly abandoned the patent application. Typically, before the USPTO grants a patent application, the patent examiner issues a number of office actions that require the applicant to make changes/amendments to the patent application. If the applicant fails to respond to the office action within the allotted time period, the patent application is deemed to have been abandoned.
The second method in which a patent becomes abandoned is if the applicant, for any reason, decides that he does not want to pay the issuance fee for the patent. If the applicant does not pay the issuance fee, he will be left with an abandoned patent that has never been granted by the USPTO. Oftentimes applicants believe that it is no longer worth their time and money to pursue the patent, so they decide not to pay the issuance fee, at which point, the patent application is deemed to have been abandoned without ever being issued or granted.
The third situation where an inventor can be left with an abandoned patent is that if the USPTO issues or grants the patent, a patent holder can abandon the patent by failing to make the required monthly maintenance fees on the patent. Maintenance fees are periodic fees that must be paid by a patent holder to keep his patent in the grant state. Maintenance fees are expensive, so oftentimes, inventors who believe that their invention is no longer profitable, choose not to pay the maintenance fees. In such a case, the patent becomes abandoned and the patent holder loses the right to enforce his rights under the patent.
What you think smart dumb nikkas been preaching their whole life? Of course they see it as truth.. No different than the host of internet theories and internet daddies they follow every single day. They are not really smart, and they have to latch onto something that makes them not only smart, but smarter than the smart people they envy..how did he even get this interview?
dude needs help... i think... the fact that some of yall are saying he speaking the truth got me like and
It meant like he said it didHis ar/vr patent is not legit. He definitely filed the patent application under his name, but look at the patent case history, it went abandoned. Meaning his idea was rejected and he has no actual patent on his "invention".
This man is mentally ill, and I'm still not quite sure if a lot of y'all are trolling in here or nah
Because they realize how stupid paying them is probablyEvery time somebody owe the IRS millions they go bat shyt crazy
I should have known lol.