fukkery alert mayne, Terrence Howard on the Joe Rogan Podcast

Status
Not open for further replies.

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
50,568
Reputation
19,531
Daps
201,413
Reppin
the ether
2. Being told he had to pay 250,000K to keep his patent active. Check.

That's a lie. His patent was never active in the first place. You can scroll down to the bottom, "legal actions", and see that the granting of the patent was never given and he didn't even respond to the initial request from the patent office.



Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
2013-05-06STCB Information on status: application discontinuation
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION



Notice that that's an APPLICATION discontinuation. His application never even proceeded, much less got granted, and thus he was never asked for money to keep the patent continuing.



Compare that to the legal actions on a Microsoft VR patent:



Notice that the 3rd action is "Patent Grant" with the text "Patented Case". Terrence's patent never got one of those.

Notice also the text later (the 6th legal action) is "Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees". Terrence never has one of those either. So his patent didn't lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees, as he had claimed. It was never even granted in the first place. Only his patent application is being cited, just as a VR priority case.





In conclusion, his idea was STOLEN.

What idea was stolen? :dead:

You haven't even managed to explain what idea is in his patent. There's no ideas there. It's just a vague description of what VR is with a random arbitrary setup and zero technical information.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
50,568
Reputation
19,531
Daps
201,413
Reppin
the ether
If anyone wants to know how seriously to take a Terrence Howard patent....besides trying to patent the general idea of VR, he had also tried to patent diamond jewelry:



I'm not exaggerating......it's a literal patent application for "diamond jewelry". Not a specific type of diamond jewelry, but diamond jewelry in general. :dead:



Notice that patent has the exact same status as the VR patent - application discontinued because he never responded to the office action.
 

Doomsday

Superstar
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
9,924
Reputation
2,498
Daps
23,514
That's a lie. His patent was never active in the first place. You can scroll down to the bottom, "legal actions", and see that the granting of the patent was never given and he didn't even respond to the initial request from the patent office.
:mjlol:False. It wouldn't be on the site at all cac. Current status, "inactive", meaning it was active at one point. This is 15 years ago.
It's just a vague description of what VR is with a random arbitrary setup and zero technical information.
:mjlol:Give me a logical breakdown of the questions I asked you.

:mjlol: You stated that they only give citations because they have to...Why did they HAVE to if, according to you, the idea is bullshyt? In fact, you claim Terrence Howard never had a patent to begin with! Which, unknowingly to you (since you exposed yourself to being a dumb ass white boy) KILLS YOUR ARGUMENT EVEN FURTHER. His patent should be cited at all in that case, it shouldn't even still be on the site!

:mjlol:You basically exposed yourself as a cac agent that isn't to be taken seriously.
 

Doomsday

Superstar
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
9,924
Reputation
2,498
Daps
23,514
If anyone wants to know how seriously to take a Terrence Howard patent....besides trying to patent the general idea of VR, he had also tried to patent diamond jewelry:



I'm not exaggerating......it's a literal patent application for "diamond jewelry". Not a specific type of diamond jewelry, but diamond jewelry in general. :dead:



Notice that patent has the exact same status as the VR patent - application discontinued because he never responded to the office action.
:mjlol:You know you fukked up right?

:mjlol:The status of that patent says, "abandoned". The status of the VR patent says, "inactive". You ONCE AGAIN proved Terrence Howard RIGHT! You fukkin' dumbass white boy! You just proved that the VR patent was active at one point, which means they did in fact price him out of a billion-dollar idea.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
50,568
Reputation
19,531
Daps
201,413
Reppin
the ether
At this point I'm pretty sure @Doomsday is Terrence Howard himself. :mjgrin:



:mjlol:False. It wouldn't be on the site at all cac. Current status, "inactive", meaning it was active at one point. This is 15 years ago.


It says the APPLICATION went inactive. Granted status is nowhere on there.

His diamond jewelry patent has the exact same status. Do you think that means Terrence Howard was granted the patent for the entire concept of diamond jewelry? :laff:






You stated that they only give citations because they have to...Why did they HAVE to if, according to you, the idea is bullshyt? In fact, you claim Terrence Howard never had a patent to begin with! Which, unknowingly to you (since you exposed yourself to being a dumb ass white boy) KILLS YOUR ARGUMENT EVEN FURTHER. His patent should be cited at all in that case, it shouldn't even still be on the site!

If you actually read his patent or any of the patents that are marked in the citations, you'd see that numerous mere "applications" are cited before the patent is ever granted. Since it takes years to grant many patents, it's important to cite applications in process as well as applications that have gone inactive, in case they become active later.

But citing a patent does not mean you used it, it merely means you're discussing it. They discussed his patent because it's the most generic description of VR, so it could apply to anything. But not a single citation states a single thing they used from it.
 

Doomsday

Superstar
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
9,924
Reputation
2,498
Daps
23,514
At this point I'm pretty sure @Doomsday is Terrence Howard himself. :mjgrin:
:mjlol:Just like a cac to believe a celebrity would take time out of their day to debate you.
It says the APPLICATION went inactive. Granted status is nowhere on there.

His diamond jewelry patent has the exact same status.
:mjlol:Wrong. They have two different statuses. Stop deflecting cac.
If you actually read his patent or any of the patents that are marked in the citations, you'd see that numerous mere "applications" are cited before the patent is ever granted. Since it takes years to grant many patents,
:mjlol: Yeah, that's why the general term 'diamond jewelry' (billion-dollar industry) only has two citations.

it merely means you're discussing it.

:mjlol:Exactly. Being discussed by the top companies in America.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
50,568
Reputation
19,531
Daps
201,413
Reppin
the ether
:mjlol:You know you fukked up right?

:mjlol:The status of that patent says, "abandoned". The status of the VR patent says, "inactive". You ONCE AGAIN proved Terrence Howard RIGHT! You fukkin' dumbass white boy! You just proved that the VR patent was active at one point, which means they did in fact price him out of a billion-dollar idea.



WTF are you talking about? What are you reading that from?



This is the status of the diamond jewelry patent application:



Application US12/567,400 events

2009-09-25 Application filed by Individual
2009-09-25 Priority to US12/567,400
2011-03-31 Publication of US20110072851A1
Status Abandoned


Legal Events​

2013-08-11 Information on status: application discontinuation Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION




This is the status of the virtual reality patent application:


Application US12/765,485 events

2010-04-22 Application filed by Individual
2010-04-22 Priority to US12/765,485
2010-10-28 Publication of US20100271394A1
Status Abandoned


Legal Events​


2013-05-06 Information on status: application discontinuation Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION




They're literally the exact same. They both say application discontinuation, they both say abandoned, they both say "failure to respond to an office action", and they both don't have a single word about the patent ever being granted or a single failure to pay.
 

ogc163

Superstar
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
9,027
Reputation
2,140
Daps
22,317
Reppin
Bronx, NYC
:mjlol:You know you fukked up right?

:mjlol:The status of that patent says, "abandoned". The status of the VR patent says, "inactive". You ONCE AGAIN proved Terrence Howard RIGHT! You fukkin' dumbass white boy! You just proved that the VR patent was active at one point, which means they did in fact price him out of a billion-dollar idea.
 

Doomsday

Superstar
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
9,924
Reputation
2,498
Daps
23,514

What is an Abandoned Patent?

ByNoah AdamJune 20, 2020

An abandoned patent is one where the patent application is no longer pending because the applicant has either failed to reply to a USPTO office action or the applicant has expressly abandoned the patent application. Typically, before the USPTO grants a patent application, the patent examiner issues a number of office actions that require the applicant to make changes/amendments to the patent application. If the applicant fails to respond to the office action within the allotted time period, the patent application is deemed to have been abandoned.
The second method in which a patent becomes abandoned is if the applicant, for any reason, decides that he does not want to pay the issuance fee for the patent. If the applicant does not pay the issuance fee, he will be left with an abandoned patent that has never been granted by the USPTO. Oftentimes applicants believe that it is no longer worth their time and money to pursue the patent, so they decide not to pay the issuance fee, at which point, the patent application is deemed to have been abandoned without ever being issued or granted.
The third situation where an inventor can be left with an abandoned patent is that if the USPTO issues or grants the patent, a patent holder can abandon the patent by failing to make the required monthly maintenance fees on the patent. Maintenance fees are periodic fees that must be paid by a patent holder to keep his patent in the grant state. Maintenance fees are expensive, so oftentimes, inventors who believe that their invention is no longer profitable, choose not to pay the maintenance fees. In such a case, the patent becomes abandoned and the patent holder loses the right to enforce his rights under the patent.

:mjlol:Game over.
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
35,409
Reputation
7,644
Daps
98,260
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
:dahell: how did he even get this interview?


dude needs help... i think... the fact that some of yall are saying he speaking the truth got me like :dahell::mjtf: and :patrice::lupe:
What you think smart dumb nikkas been preaching their whole life? Of course they see it as truth.. No different than the host of internet theories and internet daddies they follow every single day. They are not really smart, and they have to latch onto something that makes them not only smart, but smarter than the smart people they envy..

Just ask them to fully explain what he's talking about and they can't. They not even smart enough to fully grasp what these people are talking about, so how could they take that info and objectively research the truth in it?


They can't... They don't even try
 

O.T.I.S.

Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
71,244
Reputation
14,932
Daps
275,260
Reppin
The Truth
His ar/vr patent is not legit. He definitely filed the patent application under his name, but look at the patent case history, it went abandoned. Meaning his idea was rejected and he has no actual patent on his "invention".

This man is mentally ill, and I'm still not quite sure if a lot of y'all are trolling in here or nah :patrice:
It meant like he said it did

He didnt keep paying for it.

“The cost to apply for a patent is only part of the total patent fees that inventors must consider: revising, prosecuting, issuing, and maintaining a patent all add to the cost.”



And the more complicated the patent, or the more complicated the invention, the more expensive is everything.

The point is, he did have a patent as far back as 2010 (latest I saw was 2013 and that was before the podcast or the thread). And that patent was cited by mega tech corporations… all of them
 

O.T.I.S.

Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
71,244
Reputation
14,932
Daps
275,260
Reppin
The Truth
I should have known lol.

They do

One dude mentioned one inventors NAME on that podcast and dude was on a plane to Florida the next day (scared for his life, he was living on a secluded island somewhere) with his lawyer flying to japan to do damage control for a major auto company or something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top