WHO WINS?


  • Total voters
    252

Frump

Superstar
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
15,525
Reputation
-2,403
Daps
44,832
Reppin
NULL
We all have our own moral compasses, expecting people to just be ok with their countries party supporting a genocide is weird to me.

She wants a cease fire and if she accomplishes that then what’s the problem?

It’s a more complicated situation then some of you want to admit shes trying to word things carefully because it’s a negotiation and she’s also trying to win an election

She wasn’t gonna sit up there and say “free Palestine death to zionists” like you wanted her to she’s trying to win an election so she has to walk a tightrope with how she words things

At the end of the day she should be judged on wheter or not she gets it done not how she worded it in her speech. It’s semantics
 

taker597

Superstar
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
16,539
Reputation
1,048
Daps
51,189




Why have Taylor been dead silent in this situation?



Republican spoilers are real and they wear liberal clothing to steal votes that they can't get.

 

Robbie3000

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
28,853
Reputation
5,058
Daps
126,792
Reppin
NULL
She wants a cease fire and if she accomplishes that then what’s the problem?

It’s a more complicated situation then some of you want to admit shes trying to word things carefully because it’s a negotiation and she’s also trying to win an election

She wasn’t gonna sit up there and say “free Palestine death to zionists” like you wanted her to she’s trying to win an election so she has to walk a tightrope with how she words things

At the end of the day she should be judged on wheter or not she gets it done not how she worded it in her speech. It’s semantics

Breh they had police, Republicans and Reagan dikk riders speak but wouldn’t give Palestinians planning to vote for Kamala a chance to make the most milquetoast speech in support of Palestine.

It’s fukking shameful.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
43,209
Reputation
2,106
Daps
125,731
She wasn’t gonna sit up there and say “free Palestine death to zionists” like you wanted her to she’s trying to win an election so she has to walk a tightrope with how she words things
Who asked for this? This the hyperbole bs the progressive you're talking about have issues with. The biden administration which kamala is apart of SHOULD have put conditions on the weapons in Gaza after the horrific first death toll numbers first came out in December, it is now almost September and we're still backing israels blood thirst campaign to supposedly save hostages while blowing up every building, starving resources, and creating disease pandemics. every other nation on the face of this earth with a brain stopped supporting Israel in March. Here we are in September still arguing with our hands tied behind our backs
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
14,856
Reputation
4,393
Daps
41,765
She wants a cease fire and if she accomplishes that then what’s the problem?

It’s a more complicated situation then some of you want to admit shes trying to word things carefully because it’s a negotiation and she’s also trying to win an election

She wasn’t gonna sit up there and say “free Palestine death to zionists” like you wanted her to she’s trying to win an election so she has to walk a tightrope with how she words things

At the end of the day she should be judged on wheter or not she gets it done not how she worded it in her speech. It’s semantics
If it came out that the Biden-Harris administration had been funnelling millions of dollars to the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers and other white supremacist groups and stopping local law enforcement from arresting key members, do you think it would be sufficient for the administration to respond by pointing to public statements they previously made denouncing those groups and promoting the John Lewis Voting Rights Act? And if black civil rights groups asked the Harris campaign to commit to stop this slush fund to groups dedicated to disenfranchising black voters, and she responded by saying no but she supports the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, do you think those civil rights groups would be unreasonable if they called her out on it publicly?
 

taker597

Superstar
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
16,539
Reputation
1,048
Daps
51,189
If it came out that the Biden-Harris administration had been funnelling millions of dollars to the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers and other white supremacist groups and stopping local law enforcement from arresting key members, do you think it would be sufficient for the administration to respond by pointing to public statements they previously made denouncing those groups and promoting the John Lewis Voting Rights Act? And if black civil rights groups asked the Harris campaign to commit to stop this slush fund to groups dedicated to disenfranchising black voters, and she responded by saying no but she supports the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, do you think those civil rights groups would be unreasonable if they called her out on it publicly?
This is honestly such a terrible hypothetical that I need to call you out for it. It's just bad even if I can roundabout understand your message.

Let's clear something up... The United States Government is funding money to Israel through Congress not just on the him of the Administration. Biden signs it. Whether you are deliberately trying to simplify process of government aid. It's never just "So and So administration funneling money".

But I am very tired of our poverty Warmonger leech off us
 
Top