Absolut
Legal Bookie
Don’t take the life vowthe issue is people should be able to leave a marriage when it no longer suits their interest and the government shouldn't have more of say in that decision.
Don’t take the life vowthe issue is people should be able to leave a marriage when it no longer suits their interest and the government shouldn't have more of say in that decision.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't I mention specifically NO FAULT Divorces.Decreased domestic violence rates
Decreased spousal murder rates
Decreased female suicide rates
mean nothing?
No. All that is covered with at fault divorces. What’s that have to do with no cause divorces?Decreased domestic violence rates
Decreased spousal murder rates
Decreased female suicide rates
mean nothing?
Why are you trying to apply your personal religious beliefs to a government contract? Damn y'all weird.Don’t take the life vow
I’m not religious. Does your word mean fukk all? Same folks that sign a contract to pay off student loans don’t wanna pay. Make a vow to a partner for life? Nah I don’t like my decision a couple years later. How bout making a choice and being responsible for the resultsWhy are you trying to apply your personal religious beliefs to a government contract? Damn y'all weird.
Don’t take the life vow
It is religious if you think it must be for life when clearly you can dissolve the marriage. Weird ass nikkas wanting people to be stuck in a marriage. This place is fukking nuts, no Diddy.I’m not religious. Does your word mean fukk all? Same folks that sign a contract to pay off student loans don’t wanna pay. Make a vow to a partner for life? Nah I don’t like my decision a couple years later. How bout making a choice and being responsible for the results
Don’t get married to someone you are gonna bail on in a few yearsIt is religious if you think it must be for life when clearly you can dissolve the marriage. Weird ass nikkas wanting people to be stuck in a marriage. This place is fukking nuts, no Diddy.
Don’t get married to someone you are gonna bail on in a few years
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't I mention specifically NO FAULT Divorces.
No. All that is covered with at fault divorces. What’s that have to do with no cause divorces?
Then came a revolution: In 1969, then-Gov. Ronald Reagan of California (who was himself divorced) signed the nation’s first no-fault divorce law, allowing people to end their marriages without proving they’d been wronged. The move was a recognition that “people were going to get out of marriages,” Zug said, and gave them a way to do that without resorting to subterfuge. Similar laws soon swept the country, and rates of domestic violence and spousal murder began to drop as people — especially women — gained more freedom to leave dangerous situations.
Stop. People don't get married believing it won't work out, but sometimes it doesn't. In those cases, a spouse should be able to end the marriage with as few barriers as possible. Who benefits from keeping people trapped in a dysfunctional relationship?Don’t get married to someone you are gonna bail on in a few years
I think the plan is for fewer people to get married. Working class and middle class folks will hesitate knowing how hard it is to divorce.
The 1% or even Top 5% will get married because they have the $$$$ to deal with the consequences. The elites marry and pool resources to stay on top while the poors get married even less than they do now and WILL NOT pool resources. Basically making the gap between the top and bottom even larger. They want to discourage Blacks and browns while maintaining the status quo for the elites. Fewer people get married, make abortion harder so either poor women of color pop out babies they cannot take care of (school to prison pipeline). Poor whites will feed the school to police/military pipeline.
Old school European shyt. Rich own the land and hire poor whites to be the "knights" who protect their castles and shyt. Everyone else is a serf.
I couldn’t care less if they have that freedom. They signed up for it. If that’s a concern, don’t live in a state that will pass thisStop. People don't get married believing it won't work out, but sometimes it doesn't. In those cases, a spouse should be able to end the marriage with as few barriers as possible. Who benefits from keeping people trapped in a dysfunctional relationship?