Stop playing with this man. Mahomes the GOAT

Regular_P

Just end the season.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
79,464
Reputation
9,928
Daps
213,446
Eli is 2-0 vs Brady. Peyton is 3-2 vs Brady.

It means nothing.

The first time a Pat led team lost to Brady he performed better than Brady did and lost in OT without even getting to touch the ball. The second time Pat had no offensive line. Context matters.
:mjlol:

You could say the same thing about Josh Allen and Mahomes if "context" is king.
 

Regular_P

Just end the season.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
79,464
Reputation
9,928
Daps
213,446
Everyone back then knew what it was. Don't go trying to rewrite history. Dak Prescot led the league in touchdown. He aint a game manager?
What a terrible argument. Brady was throwing to #3 receivers at best during those seasons. Once he got a real #1 in Moss, his numbers went through the roof.

You can't even compare the scrubs Brady was throwing to versus what Peyton was working with.

KC right now has better weapons because Kelce, even an aging Kelce, is >>>>> what New England had before 2007.

David Givens was Brady's top target in 2004 and he was out of the league after 2006, the year he went to Tennessee.
 

Supa

Veteran
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
19,911
Reputation
6,995
Daps
109,631
Reppin
NULL
He was talkin about the first playoff run.

Bruschi said Mahomes first 6 years are better than Brady's. He also said they relied on the defense and running game more than the QB whereas Mahomes is the focal point in KC.

This isn't even a debate but you guys are using a 22 year sample size when the argument is 6 years vs 6 years.
 

Jplaya2023

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
42,093
Reputation
-510
Daps
86,931
Bruschi said Mahomes first 6 years are better than Brady's. He also said they relied on the defense and running game more than the QB whereas Mahomes is the focal point in KC.

This isn't even a debate but you guys are using a 22 year sample size when the argument is 6 years vs 6 years.
Right thats why toms 1st half of his career vs pat mahomes is a complete wash. Compare toms last 6 to mshomes 1st six its better
 

Supa

Veteran
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
19,911
Reputation
6,995
Daps
109,631
Reppin
NULL
Right thats why toms 1st half of his career vs pat mahomes is a complete wash. Compare toms last 6 to mshomes 1st six its better

Mahomes's numbers are still better but you can only compare the first 6 years because Mahomes has only played six years.
 

Jplaya2023

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
42,093
Reputation
-510
Daps
86,931
Mahomes's numbers are still better but you can only compare the first 6 years because Mahomes has only played six years.
Exactly but the numberd are closer and since they played in the same era theres more context to the stats
 

28 Gramz

How U Luv That???
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
11,001
Reputation
1,382
Daps
33,169
Reppin
Tre-4,North Carolina
Bruschi said Mahomes first 6 years are better than Brady's. He also said they relied on the defense and running game more than the QB whereas Mahomes is the focal point in KC.

This isn't even a debate but you guys are using a 22 year sample size when the argument is 6 years vs 6 years.

KC literally just won a Superbowl shutting down an offense with 6 all pros and making 2 top 5 quarterbacks look pedestrian along the way. Their defense was the focal point of this run.
 
Last edited:
Top