Adding Seth to it does offer intrigue, yes. I'm very interested in seeing what that looks like.
But yeah, at this point it's personal preference we're discussing and that's fine. I feel like I've said it before, but I understand why Drew got picked. I just didn't agree with it because of my take on how MITB should be used.
Adding the IC and US titles to it -- especially when the US champion is a part-timer and the IC champion is super resilient and always snatching victory from the jaws of defeat -- adds to the unpredictability surrounding the case and expands what the MITB can mean. At the end of the day, it represents an opportunity otherwise not afforded.
In this case, I feel it got won by the one dude who has the most clout to ask for an opportunity among the field and subsequently get it. I'll put it like this: if Drew wasn't feuding with Punk at the time, then I'd say him winning the case, even if he lost the cash-in, is a good call because in kayfabe, he's by far the best/most accomplished talent in the match and it's almost poetic for him to walk around with the very thing that took the title from him.
Drew winning when we all know Punk is right there waiting to snatch it from him kills whatever intrigue I had in the briefcase because I know how it's gonna go and again, I don't think the feud needed that extra oomph. It was already hot without it. Now something I care about as a fan (the MITB itself) is over and done with for what I believe is no reason.
As far as Priest, I wish I didn't see it how I see it, but alas. I think he's done the absolute best with what he's been given, but what he's been given to work with is not ideal.