Ozymandeas
Veteran
He don’t walk it like he talk it 
2024 U.S. Presidential General Election Thread
- Thread starter FAH1223
- Start date
the cac mamba
Veteran
that's an angle. i'm kinda hoping she throws biden under the bus for inflation, and everything else, and somehow (delicately 
) pivots to fighting it going forward
Poetical Poltergeist
Precise and cold hearted
She Killin it
AVXL
Laughing at you n*ggaz like “ha ha ha”
If you got it on ya chest shawty say it to my face
NaijaProdigy Redux
Veteran
god bless Walz for calling them weird and making it mainstream
People was in here capping, man is damn near incoherentbiden looks horrendous lately. his speech the other day wasso fukking insulting how him and his team hid him from the country and the party
If you got it on ya chest shawty say it to my face
NaijaProdigy Redux
Veteran
Told that orange scam artist to pull up if he's really about it.
progressives 
Emma, girl…fukk that border
Emma, girl…fukk that border
The fukk are they trying to say?
AI generated explanation(nemotron-4-340b-instruct):
The Twitter thread and the accompanying commentary are discussing a well-known social science result regarding the electoral prospects of female candidates, particularly those from minority backgrounds. The key points are:
1. Women, on average, do not face an electoral penalty compared to men. In fact, they have a slight advantage, as evidenced by a meta-analysis of over 300,000 experimental profiles of politicians in more than 40 studies.
2. However, left-leaning female candidates often believe they are disadvantaged, which may discourage them from running for office. This perception could be a reason why some of the most high-profile female leaders in countries like Germany, France, the UK, and Canada are right-wing.
3. The meta-analysis also found that voters do not discriminate against minoritized politicians, and women and Asian candidates even have a significant advantage compared to male and white candidates.
4. Despite these findings, many journalists and commentators continue to perpetuate the narrative that voters discriminate against women and people of color, which can negatively impact the political prospects of these candidates. This assumption of discrimination can hurt women politicians and politicians of color, even when voters are not as prejudiced as commonly believed.
5. The thread highlights that while voters' first impressions of women and people of color are not negative, political opponents can still mobilize negative stereotypes, which can change voters' minds during campaigns. Examples include the "Birther" campaign against Barack Obama and negative campaigning against Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris.
6. The author of the thread, Sanne van Oosten, expresses concern that the positive findings from the meta-analysis are not being reported as widely as they should be, possibly because they do not fit the narrative of widespread discrimination by voters. She encourages more journalists to share this hopeful message to promote representative democracies.
Last edited:
Ozymandeas
Veteran
Trump at home right now
Things are getting a little “ urban”now
I just need Andy Beshear to say, real Americans make couches, they don't fukk 'em. Them MAGAS are NOT LIKE US
Similar threads
- Poll
