Zanzibar Revolution 1964-The day Africans Slaughtered their Arab Enslavers

[Swagnificent]

nikka these mf's were on some ANTI BLACK trader bullshyt against "their own" then yeah they needed to go, and most brutally.

No. They were ANTI certain African tribes. Stop trying to project the American concept of race to them. Its like saying the Darfur crisis last decade was anti-black cause the North Sudanese who are ethnically Arab were fighting the South Sudanese that were ethnically Dinka and Nuer. It was a tribal conflict over water resources between two groups who looked phenotypically black. It was not about black vs non-black as the white media tried to make it out.

Just because white supremacy has decided to always identify slavery as a issue of black people being exploited by non-blacks does not mean we should accept it. Use your god damn head. If the Sultan of Zanzibar looked like that then this was obviously not about race as we understand it but rather it was about ethnicity. And when talking about ethnic beef, its universal across all races so why should we as black Americans care? Did you pick sides when the Hutus and Tutsis were killing each other? Or how about the current conflict in Ethiopia?

The Zanzibar conflict is no different than any other African conflict between different ethnic groups.

 

[African Peasant]

You do know this was black on black violence right?

The Zanzibar Arabs were black like Sudanese Arabs. Here is the most famous Zanzibar Arab slave owner and trader: Tippu Tip - Wikipedia

Stop assuming all arabs are pale skin cacs.

They were mixed.

Interesting piece... independence was necessary but the method was madness

using rape as a war tactic and killing kids was definitely barbaric

Yep. Horrible.

 

[Swagnificent]

They were mixed.

Some were. Most weren't. Tippu Tip was clearly fully black. Same goes for the Sultan whose kids were photographed in my earlier post.

 

[Asante]

No. They were ANTI certain African tribes. Stop trying to project the American concept of race to them. Its like saying the Darfur crisis last decade was anti-black cause the North Sudanese who are ethnically Arab were fighting the South Sudanese that were ethnically Dinka and Nuer.

Are you fukkin stupid? These "Africans" who have adopted the culture of NON AFRICAN invaders have been the biggest terrorist to Africans in recent history. That is due almost entirely to their perversed alliance with a non African ideology. Regardless of a fukking dominant phenotype. I don't give a fukk if those confused bytches got chopped to pieces.

The Zanzibar conflict is no different than any other African conflict between different ethnic groups.

You are dumb af aren't you?

 

[Swagnificent]

Are you fukkin stupid? These "Africans" who have adopted the culture of NON AFRICAN invaders have been the biggest terrorist to Africans in recent history. That is due almost entirely to their perversed alliance with a non African ideology. Regardless of a fukking dominant phenotype. I don't give a fukk if those confused bytches got chopped to pieces.

I love Chancellor Williams but this is one thing he fukked up on. He totally misinterpreted who the Arabs were. Its similar to how cacs will use images like this of Ramsses fighting with the Nubians as evidence the Ancient Egyptians couldn't have been black.

The Arabs who spread Islam were actually black. The modern day white Arab is actually descended from Europeans who were enslaved by the original Arabs. The Arabs actually enslaved more Europeans than Africans contrary to what white supremacy would lead you to believe. The Africans who aligned themselves with Islam were aligning with a black ideology. You need to study up on the true history of all the Abrahamic faiths. They were all started by black people.

Black people can kill and enslave one another without it being about them playing into a non-African ideology. Neighboring people and countries typically are the biggest enemies. Look no further than the Ancient Egyptians and Nubians. Just because white supremacy has linked slavery with blackness the last few centuries doesn't mean this was always historically true. The vast majority of people enslaved by the Arabs were white. And the vast majority of Arabs/Moors doing that enslavement were black men. Don't let crakkkas twist our history into one where we are always been dominated. We are the ones who dominated them.

 

[Swagnificent]

More pictures of the Sultans of Zanzibar so folks can see how these "Arabs" enslaving "Africans" looked:

Here's a picture of the LAST Sultan of Zanzibar who fled to Oman after the revolution:

He looks like he could pass as Elijah Muhammad's brother.


And here are some "Arab" females so ya'll can see how the ladies looked:

Ya'll need to stop falling for the lies of white supremacy. Both sides of the Zanzibar conflict were black. Both the Arabs and the Africans. No different than the North Sudanese beef with the South Sudanese. White supremacy just loves putting the label of Arabs vs Africans so that we can be brainwashed into thinking black people have always been nothing but slaves.

 

[Wiseborn]

Those guys are mixed. Just like we got mixed negroes here in America, in that part of Africa you had a lot of trade happening on the Indian Ocean so a lot of the coastal Africans mixed with non-African sea merchants. Patrick Mahomes and Drake would fit in among those so-called sand cacs.

You guys need to stop giving non-whites so much credit. They never did much in terms of slavery in Africa. Most of it was us. And slavery isn't that big a deal to future generations. Its only bad for those who are enslaved. The issue we have with slavery here in America is really a white supremacy issue. Because race and slavery were tied together here in the Americas, it allowed the vestiges of slavery to persist even after slavery ended.

Almost every human society had slavery at one point or another. But in no other society was slavery and race tied together. So after a few generations nobody knew who was descended of slaves and who was descended from slave owners. Thus the vestiges of servitude didn't persist. However, that wasn't the case in the Americas. Because race was tied to enslavement, we will always know who is descended from slaves and who is descended from slave owners.

Racism and white supremacy is the real culprit. Not slavery.

Dude there was arab supremacy. It was essentially the same thing and the Africans finally got justice.

 

[Wiseborn]

More pictures of the Sultans of Zanzibar so folks can see how these "Arabs" enslaving "Africans" looked:

Here's a picture of the LAST Sultan of Zanzibar who fled to Oman after the revolution:

He looks like he could pass as Elijah Muhammad's brother.


And here are some "Arab" females so ya'll can see how the ladies looked:

Ya'll need to stop falling for the lies of white supremacy. Both sides of the Zanzibar conflict were black. Both the Arabs and the Africans. No different than the North Sudanese beef with the South Sudanese. White supremacy just loves putting the label of Arabs vs Africans so that we can be brainwashed into thinking black people have always been nothing but slaves.

All of this is besides the point. It's just a cultural difference in arabs claiming the sons of the father, as you said slavery happened all over and arabs enslaved everyone they could. There's some chinese arabs in saudi arabia too.

But if someone was pitch Black and looked outside of Africa culturally he's a c00n full stop and needs his head cut off.

 

[Wiseborn]

Are you fukkin stupid? These "Africans" who have adopted the culture of NON AFRICAN invaders have been the biggest terrorist to Africans in recent history. That is due almost entirely to their perversed alliance with a non African ideology. Regardless of a fukking dominant phenotype. I don't give a fukk if those confused bytches got chopped to pieces.



You are dumb af aren't you?

Right now in Mali you got African Tuaregs thinking they're pale arabs working for Al-Queda enslaving fully Black Southern Mailians.

 

[Swagnificent]

Dude there was arab supremacy. It was essentially the same thing and the Africans finally got justice.

Ok. And in Ethiopia they got Amhara supremacy. Its why the Oromo are fighting for their freedom right now. Which side are you cheering for?

The Arabs of Zanzibar were black. Just like the Africans. Look at the pictures I just posted of their Kings/Sultans. They look like black men you would find in America. Thus why should we care about either side of that beef? Yall just fell for the white supremacist trick of assuming the Arabs in Zanzibar were non-black and thus this was an anti-black situation. Which it clearly wasn't.

If both sides are black, I don't care.

 

[Swagnificent]

It's just a cultural difference in arabs claiming the sons of the father, as you said slavery happened all over and arabs enslaved everyone they could.

Exactly.

And its the white Arabs of today who are the children from slavery. Not the black Arabs. I've already linked several threads I've made in the past few years showing this.

The original Arabs were black. They enslaved millions of Europeans. They procreated with those Europeans creating the pale skin folks right now you are misinterpreting as "real Arabs" while falsely assuming the black Arabs are the ones who only became Arab recently as a result of mixing during slavery.

Yall really been brainwashed well by white supremacy. I keep showing yall the truth and yet you keep repeating these silly arguments based on a false assumption. Its like assuming the modern Egyptians are the same as the Ancient Egyptians. That's how silly you sound with this post.

 

[Swagnificent]

The Arabic slavers that enslaved other Africans looked more like this but keep cookin c00n

You got a response to all the pictures I just posted of the Sultans (aka Kings) of Zanzibar?

Not exactly the pale skins you tried to imply with this picture that had no sourcing.

If the kings of Zanzibar were black, who cares who the fukk these nikkas you posted are?

 

[Swagnificent]

Swagnificent should be banned. He's derailing the thread.

Thus far I seem to be the only one who is posting actual information in this thread. Like actual pictures of the "Arab" Sultans of Zanzibar during the time of slavery showing they were clearly black.

Guess your cac ass is mad I've destroyed the myth it was pale skin Arabs enslaving black Africans. Yall love making us victims of white domination globally.

 

[Wiseborn]

Exactly.

And its the white Arabs of today who are the children from slavery. Not the black Arabs. I've already linked several threads I've made in the past few years showing this.

The original Arabs were black. They enslaved millions of Europeans. They procreated with those Europeans creating the pale skin folks right now you are misinterpreting as "real Arabs" while falsely assuming the black Arabs are the ones who only became Arab recently as a result of mixing during slavery.

Yall really been brainwashed well by white supremacy. I keep showing yall the truth and yet you keep repeating these silly arguments based on a false assumption. Its like assuming the modern Egyptians are the same as the Ancient Egyptians. That's how silly you sound with this post.

Let's say that the orginal arabs were Black fukk THOSE PEOPLE anyone tryin g to enslave Black people now needs to be wiped off the planet. Black white whoever.

fukk apologizing for these super c00n ass nikkas that got all that oil but are dominated by Isreal.

 

[Wiseborn]

Ok. And in Ethiopia they got Amhara supremacy. Its why the Oromo are fighting for their freedom right now. Which side are you cheering for?

The Arabs of Zanzibar were black. Just like the Africans. Look at the pictures I just posted of their Kings/Sultans. They look like black men you would find in America. Thus why should we care about either side of that beef? Yall just fell for the white supremacist trick of assuming the Arabs in Zanzibar were non-black and thus this was an anti-black situation. Which it clearly wasn't.

If both sides are black, I don't care.

I care, first of all if people can't come together they always ally with outsiders who end up taking over. It's one thing to be the dominant tribe. People can live. But to be an slave there's no excuse for that. Besides it doesn't forward your society. I mean america freed it's slaves but they still treat us like shyt. You can enslave women so that you can rape them at will. You can enslave people to do agricultural work (that can be done easier with a tractor) But you can't make a slave work at a factory. They'll work slower or fukk up the equipment. You can't make a slave innovate, He has no buy in to do so he's not going to benefit by doing something better.

If you as a culture can't observe reality somethings wrong with you. You have Tuaregs in Mali burning up in their tents, feeling superior to Africans who love an accept other Africans meanwhile in Bamako you got non arabized Africans dring cars and living in Air conditioned houses.

To try to make a point you fail to see the bigger picture. Lets say these c00n arabs (who never get accepted by the gulf arabs btw) are Black, and they enslave other Black people, Those Black people then work with white people to take over. Look at Sudan, very darkskinned "arabs" not accepted by other arabs yet enslaving Africans, what happened? They lost half their country. They kept it up now they had to accept a c00n deal where they pay the US govt and accept Isreal's right to exist. They'd be a superpower if they managed to unite.