fifth column
Superstar
Mike was the apex predator of his era with no natural challengers, that’s why he’s the goat.That team that lost Ben Wallace went to another ECF the year after losing to the Cavs, so I wouldn't overstate the loss of Ben Wallace...
I don't understand what you're confused about. Michael Jordan never took any team to The Finals unless he had the best team in basketball. The only teams during those Bulls runs that were even viewed as legitimate threats to them were the '93 Suns and the '98 Jazz. That's it...
The 4 years Bron won the championship, the '12 Bulls, '12 Spurs, '12 Thunder; '16 Warriors, '16 Spurs, '16 Thunder; '20 Bucks, and '20 Clippers, were all seen as teams better than LeBron's team heading into the playoffs, and yet he won the title those years anyway...
2007, 2014, 2015, 2017, and 2018 are years he also didn't have the best team but led teams to the precipice of the LOB anyway. What is there to argue here? Michael Jordan was nowhere near the floor raiser that LeBron was...
My response was a direct correlation to you mentioning the teams Mike beat in the ECF as elite challengers, so I listed elite teams Bron beat in The East en route, since you chose to downplay his opponents as simply DeRozan or Atlanta...
Who were the teams during Jordan's title runs that were viewed as real challengers to the throne?
Mike never went to G7 in The Finals because he got 4 of his Finals vs career choke artists/playoff underachievers (Drexler and the Blazers; Barkley and the Suns; the Stockton/Malone Jazz); 1 of his Finals vs an overachieving formerly great team on its last legs ('91 Lakers); and 1 vs a one hit wonder ('96 Sonics)...
LeBron played 70% of his Finals vs the Warriors and Spurs. Those are 7 opponents better than ANY of the 6 opponents Mike faced. Stop it, bro. We not about to play this game like Mike's opps were like that...
Bruh we don't care that Mike dominated that era, it was one if the weaker historical eras in league history. He wasn't doing that shyt in the 80s and he wouldn't do it in any other era besides possibly the 70s and first half of the 00s. You're not scoring the way you think you are by saying Mike dominated 90s basketball...
Your problem is that you can’t fathom how MJ could have been that legendary so you try to Lexplain away his achievements/ dominance in order to prop up Lebron who is really not even a real challenger to Mike.