and you clearly have no idea how drug rehabilitation/addiction works
then when they're off the drugs and out of rehab are they magically going to have jobs and houses to live in?
you have no solution either.
They're Saying California Has Spent 17 Billions In 4 Years To Fight Homelessness, But It's Gotten Worse
- Thread starter TELL ME YA CHEESIN FAM?
- Start date
then when they're off the drugs and out of rehab are they magically going to have jobs and houses to live in?
you have no solution either.
Just a dumb idea. Protect the lowlifes of society, let the actual productive people of society support their every need while the actual working people are going to join the ranks of the homeless because rent is brazy. Smh.
The posters who know literally nothing about the issue beyond their own agendas still won't stop the "I know the solution!" comments.
How is that "the only real way of dealing with this" when I've posted other proven ways of dealing with this?
Finland is on the way to eradicating homelessness across the country.
www.google.com
world-habitat.org
The Obama Administration massively reduced veteran homelessness from 2010-2016.
/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-tbt.s3.amazonaws.com/public/TBTBN7WILMI6TNW2PAY4DVT77I.jpg)
www.google.com
Here's four more examples:
archive.thinkprogress.org
I'm sure you have great examples of your technique working though?
How is that "the only real way of dealing with this" when I've posted other proven ways of dealing with this?
Finland is on the way to eradicating homelessness across the country.
Finland’s Zero Homeless Strategy: Lessons from a Success Story
By Laurence Boone, Boris Cournède, OECD Economics Department; and Marissa Plouin, OECD Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs Following a period when homele…
www.google.com
Helsinki is still leading the way in ending homelessness – but how are they doing it? - World Habitat
In this blog, to mark World Homeless Day on 10 October, we look at how the Finland city’s Housing First approach has successfully decreased street homelessness Homelessness is the ultimate product of a broken housing system, but World Habitat knows that there are beacons of excellence that...
world-habitat.org
The Obama Administration massively reduced veteran homelessness from 2010-2016.
Veteran Homelessness Drops Nearly 50 Percent Since 2010
Federal officials announced that the number of veterans experiencing homelessness in the U.S. has been cut nearly in half since 2010 due to efforts by federal, state and local partners.
www.defense.gov
Homelessness among veterans declined through Obama administration efforts (w/video)
TAMPA
www.google.com
Here's four more examples:
Four Countries The United States Can Look To When Fighting Homelessness
archive.thinkprogress.org
I'm sure you have great examples of your technique working though?
Last edited:
The posters who know literally nothing about the issue beyond their own agendas still won't stop the "I know the solution!" comments.
You got me man, 15 years ago I failed to single-handedly stop the 2020s rise in homelessness in California. If only I had used my immense power more effectively, we'd be in a better spot right now.
How is that "the only real way of dealing with this" when I've posted other proven ways of dealing with this?
Finland is on the way to eradicating homelessness across the country.
Finland’s Zero Homeless Strategy: Lessons from a Success Story
By Laurence Boone, Boris Cournède, OECD Economics Department; and Marissa Plouin, OECD Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs Following a period when homele…
Helsinki is still leading the way in ending homelessness – but how are they doing it? - World Habitat
In this blog, to mark World Homeless Day on 10 October, we look at how the Finland city’s Housing First approach has successfully decreased street homelessness Homelessness is the ultimate product of a broken housing system, but World Habitat knows that there are beacons of excellence that...
The Obama Administration massively reduced veteran homelessness from 2010-2016.
Veteran Homelessness Drops Nearly 50 Percent Since 2010
Federal officials announced that the number of veterans experiencing homelessness in the U.S. has been cut nearly in half since 2010 due to efforts by federal, state and local partners.www.defense.gov
Homelessness among veterans declined through Obama administration efforts (w/video)
TAMPA
Here's four more examples:
Four Countries The United States Can Look To When Fighting Homelessness
I'm sure you have great examples of your technique working though?
Implement my solution and it will be virtually zero.
Wargames
One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Why would they do that when they can ego trip, lie to themselves and the public about their capability, and waste taxpayer money?For those who think the issue is impossible to solve or that people just want to stay homeless, why not look at actual success stories?
Finland is on the way to eradicating homelessness across the country.
Finland’s Zero Homeless Strategy: Lessons from a Success Story
By Laurence Boone, Boris Cournède, OECD Economics Department; and Marissa Plouin, OECD Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs Following a period when homele…
Helsinki is still leading the way in ending homelessness – but how are they doing it? - World Habitat
In this blog, to mark World Homeless Day on 10 October, we look at how the Finland city’s Housing First approach has successfully decreased street homelessness Homelessness is the ultimate product of a broken housing system, but World Habitat knows that there are beacons of excellence that...
The Obama Administration massively reduced veteran homelessness from 2010-2016.
Veteran Homelessness Drops Nearly 50 Percent Since 2010
Federal officials announced that the number of veterans experiencing homelessness in the U.S. has been cut nearly in half since 2010 due to efforts by federal, state and local partners.www.defense.gov
Homelessness among veterans declined through Obama administration efforts (w/video)
TAMPA
the cac mamba
Veteran
@itsyoung!! is pound for pound one of the dumbest people on this board. I don’t think that poster knows how to tie their own shoes.
@the cac mamba is a troll, and never says anything of substance. Just a right wing hot take machine.
You know this so I’m shocked ur surprised about it
yeah, you provided a link that california may be better than 1 state. there's 50 states
what the fukk is your point? but i get it, you're both some of the worst democrat shills on the site
kingjones29
All Star
Cali is going to go broke
yeah, you provided a link that california may be better than 1 state. there's 50 states
but i get it, you're both some of the worst democrat shills on the site
The study in that link says that there's 38 states with higher effective tax rates than California for the median taxpayer, though they shift to slightly above average when cost of living is factored in. You really never read jack shyt, do you?
Taxes by State
| Overall Rank (1=Lowest) | State | Effective Total State & Local Tax Rates on Median U.S. Household* | Annual State & Local Taxes on Median U.S. Household* | % Difference Between State & U.S. Avg.** | Annual State & Local Taxes on Median State Household*** | Adjusted Overall Rank (based on Cost of Living Index) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alaska | 6.05% | $4,204 | -43.82% | $4,870 | 4 |
| 2 | Delaware | 6.34% | $4,405 | -41.14% | $4,707 | 1 |
| 3 | Montana | 7.12% | $4,948 | -33.88% | $4,773 | 2 |
| 4 | Nevada | 7.79% | $5,414 | -27.64% | $5,636 | 10 |
| 5 | Wyoming | 8.06% | $5,604 | -25.10% | $5,511 | 9 |
| 6 | Florida | 8.21% | $5,706 | -23.74% | $5,355 | 6 |
| 7 | Utah | 8.23% | $5,719 | -23.57% | $6,887 | 8 |
| 8 | Idaho | 8.29% | $5,765 | -22.96% | $5,545 | 5 |
| 9 | Colorado | 8.53% | $5,930 | -20.75% | $7,383 | 13 |
| 10 | Tennessee | 8.58% | $5,965 | -20.29% | $4,964 | 3 |
| 11 | Oregon | 8.91% | $6,192 | -17.25% | $7,329 | 22 |
| 12 | California | 8.97% | $6,238 | -16.64% | $9,612 | 32 |
| 13 | South Carolina | 9.07% | $6,304 | -15.75% | $5,288 | 11 |
| 14 | Alabama | 9.12% | $6,341 | -15.26% | $4,924 | 7 |
| 15 | District of Columbia | 9.13% | $6,343 | -15.23% | $10,357 | 46 |
| 16 | Arizona | 9.39% | $6,529 | -12.75% | $6,452 | 14 |
| 17 | West Virginia | 9.72% | $6,758 | -9.69% | $4,780 | 12 |
| 18 | New Hampshire | 9.90% | $6,879 | -8.06% | $8,061 | 31 |
| 19 | North Dakota | 10.16% | $7,064 | -5.60% | $6,652 | 25 |
| 20 | North Carolina | 10.51% | $7,307 | -2.35% | $6,302 | 16 |
| 21 | Georgia | 10.55% | $7,335 | -1.98% | $6,692 | 15 |
| 22 | New Mexico | 10.59% | $7,361 | -1.63% | $5,698 | 21 |
| 23 | Virginia | 10.69% | $7,433 | -0.66% | $8,578 | 24 |
| 24 | Hawaii | 10.70% | $7,440 | -0.57% | $10,456 | 50 |
| 25 | Louisiana | 10.75% | $7,469 | -0.18% | $5,710 | 19 |
| 26 | Massachusetts | 10.86% | $7,551 | 0.92% | $10,870 | 43 |
| 27 | South Dakota | 11.01% | $7,656 | 2.31% | $6,597 | 26 |
| 28 | Rhode Island | 11.24% | $7,816 | 4.45% | $8,842 | 44 |
| 29 | Arkansas | 11.30% | $7,852 | 4.93% | $5,712 | 18 |
| 30 | Missouri | 11.30% | $7,855 | 4.97% | $6,578 | 17 |
| 31 | Minnesota | 11.31% | $7,859 | 5.03% | $8,511 | 30 |
| 32 | Oklahoma | 11.51% | $8,002 | 6.94% | $6,154 | 23 |
| 33 | Maryland | 11.52% | $8,006 | 6.99% | $10,729 | 45 |
| 34 | Maine | 11.62% | $8,075 | 7.91% | $7,289 | 39 |
| 35 | Indiana | 11.76% | $8,173 | 9.23% | $6,851 | 28 |
| 36 | Vermont | 11.77% | $8,183 | 9.36% | $8,060 | 42 |
| 37 | Mississippi | 11.93% | $8,290 | 10.79% | $5,834 | 20 |
| 38 | Washington | 11.97% | $8,323 | 11.22% | $10,915 | 40 |
| 39 | Michigan | 12.15% | $8,449 | 12.91% | $6,965 | 27 |
| 40 | Kentucky | 12.50% | $8,687 | 16.09% | $6,698 | 29 |
| 41 | Texas | 12.73% | $8,846 | 18.21% | $8,006 | 34 |
| 42 | Wisconsin | 12.95% | $9,004 | 20.32% | $8,089 | 35 |
| 43 | New Jersey | 12.98% | $9,023 | 20.58% | $12,652 | 48 |
| 44 | Nebraska | 13.15% | $9,142 | 22.17% | $7,786 | 37 |
| 45 | Ohio | 13.20% | $9,178 | 22.66% | $7,306 | 33 |
| 46 | Iowa | 13.31% | $9,248 | 23.60% | $7,645 | 36 |
| 47 | Kansas | 13.57% | $9,433 | 26.06% | $7,919 | 38 |
| 48 | Pennsylvania | 13.92% | $9,675 | 29.30% | $8,820 | 41 |
| 49 | New York | 14.23% | $9,894 | 32.22% | $12,047 | 49 |
| 50 | Connecticut | 14.80% | $10,287 | 37.47% | $12,120 | 51 |
| 51 | Illinois | 15.05% | $10,463 | 39.83% | $9,987 | 47 |
This is the third time you've lied in the thread, and just I predicted, you know literally nothing about anything you talk about and you're incapable of admitting you're wrong.
the cac mamba
Veteran
that study is bullshyt
The California exodus continued in 2022, new data suggests
The California exodus continued in 2022, according to new data.
CashmereThoughts
Veteran
you can wear you MAGA merch comfortably down there tooSouth Orange County, it's obviouslybut they HOH (hard on homeless)
Scustin Bieburr
Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Where is the money going exactly?
Let's look at the reasons people are homeless:
1. Physical or mental disability that can't be treated with medicine alone
2. A lack of subsidized housing
The state can dole out funds more effectively if these kind of conditions are met:
1. The city has cleared out some parking lots and invested a certain percentage of its budget on public transportation so people have a low cost travel alternative.
They can then use those funds they get to build subsidized housing on the spaces that used to be used for parking lots.
2. The local non profits put out a detailed breakdown of expenses and if their administrative expenses take up more than 20% of their budget they don't get anything. The money should he going to hire Frontline workers not give the ceo a raise and made up positions for his or her friends to pretend that they're working.
3. The city can get funds if it's police force is meeting certain state standards. A false charge can torpedo someone's entire career and life. If the police are overzealous and targeting people to meet their arrest quotas then those people end up getting detained, missing work, and then losing their jobs. If they can't make rent, they lose their home and now they're homeless and have a harder time getting back in the work force.
A lot of money needs to go into health care, and a lot of money needs to go to infrastructure and education. Design your city to be more walkable and you'll have less money being spent on gas and car payments and more space for affordable housing to be built. Put money into hospitals and integrated clinics where people can see a doctor, physiotherapist, counselor, etc. All in one spot. Put that money into facilities for the people who are beyond 'hard work' e.g. people with downe syndrome, severe disabilities, and addictions that can't be treated. Those kind of people just won't be able to hold down a job so they should go into a place where they're getting Healthcare instead of filling up the prisons and crowding the streets. When you arrest a homeless person, you're STILL paying for their food and shelter. You've created an incentive for people to commit crime so they can go somewhere where they'll sleep, get food, exercise, and most vital: access to Healthcare within the prison.
You're still putting them in institutions but you're putting them in the WRONG institutions.
Let's look at the reasons people are homeless:
1. Physical or mental disability that can't be treated with medicine alone
2. A lack of subsidized housing
The state can dole out funds more effectively if these kind of conditions are met:
1. The city has cleared out some parking lots and invested a certain percentage of its budget on public transportation so people have a low cost travel alternative.
They can then use those funds they get to build subsidized housing on the spaces that used to be used for parking lots.
2. The local non profits put out a detailed breakdown of expenses and if their administrative expenses take up more than 20% of their budget they don't get anything. The money should he going to hire Frontline workers not give the ceo a raise and made up positions for his or her friends to pretend that they're working.
3. The city can get funds if it's police force is meeting certain state standards. A false charge can torpedo someone's entire career and life. If the police are overzealous and targeting people to meet their arrest quotas then those people end up getting detained, missing work, and then losing their jobs. If they can't make rent, they lose their home and now they're homeless and have a harder time getting back in the work force.
A lot of money needs to go into health care, and a lot of money needs to go to infrastructure and education. Design your city to be more walkable and you'll have less money being spent on gas and car payments and more space for affordable housing to be built. Put money into hospitals and integrated clinics where people can see a doctor, physiotherapist, counselor, etc. All in one spot. Put that money into facilities for the people who are beyond 'hard work' e.g. people with downe syndrome, severe disabilities, and addictions that can't be treated. Those kind of people just won't be able to hold down a job so they should go into a place where they're getting Healthcare instead of filling up the prisons and crowding the streets. When you arrest a homeless person, you're STILL paying for their food and shelter. You've created an incentive for people to commit crime so they can go somewhere where they'll sleep, get food, exercise, and most vital: access to Healthcare within the prison.
You're still putting them in institutions but you're putting them in the WRONG institutions.
Trojan 24
Veteran
It's sad shyt but if I have a family I don't wanna worry about my wife making a Target run and running into bullshyt. I was at the Target in Pasadena yesterday, a fairly affluent area, had one homeless in there yelling and one laid out right in front tweaking. Getting hard to avoid that kind of shyt
Godless Socialist CEO
Superstar
yeah, you provided a link that california may be better than 1 state. there's 50 states
but i get it, you're both some of the worst democrat shills on the site
