The meaning(lessness) of Westbrook's triple-doubles

93 til

Superstar
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
12,196
Reputation
1,811
Daps
48,132
The hate on Russ is irrational. Just sit back and enjoy what he's doing. We are in a age where players rather take a day off than suit up and here we got a guy who brings it every single night. Not only is he putting up crazy numbers but he hasn't missed a game all year. That alone is impressive considering the motor this guy has.

Some of these arguments don't make sense. He's a ballhog yet he is 3rd in the entire league in assists averaging 10+. His triple doubles don't equal more wins yet the Thunder have a way better record when he accomplishes a triple double vs the games he doesn't. Brehs this is the first time in our lifetime someone has been able to accomplish this feat. Enjoy it for what it is.
 

Blackrogue

Superstar
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
14,062
Reputation
4,339
Daps
46,744
Reppin
Nai
I think Russ numbers are impressive. I've been looking at him statistically wondering how wall can get there but the more i look at it the less im enamoured .

His rebounds are coming off silly schemes, hes ball watching and thinking more about rebounds.

Hes playing very little defense and again neglects D to chase stats.. So his numbers would be better but he has made the team worse in that play.

I have some qualms with his assists and points in the sense that his choices are bad and are mostly dictated by chasing numbers.

He takes a ton of shots. When he on hell get 57 points on 40 shots or whatever but when he's off.. I watched them play the wizards aftee wondering what John can do to close this supposed gap. John played like a pg and run the team in a balanced way and generally played the right way. Russ shot okc out the game and it reached a point they had missed so many shots in a row the game was a blow out and Russ was shutdown early for good.

He can likely get the MVP becsuse his team has totally given him the reigns and sold out to get him his numbers. So he is the most valuable to the team.

Now he can do what he wants
:francis:
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
80,270
Reputation
24,522
Daps
363,347
They have a WINNIING record when he gets a triple double and LOSING record when he doesn't .

Seems to me the whole team is better when he balls out.:youngsabo:
Fair enough.

Although I understand the point others make that the triple double is kind of an arbitrary way to look at things.

Consider that in the 1986-87 season the Chicago Bulls were 22-15 when Michael Jordan scored at least 40 points in a game. And they were 18-27 when he scored less than 40.

By your logic, Michael scoring 40 points led to more winning. But 40 points is arguably just as arbitrary as a Triple Double. And in the end the team itself wasn't very good, so how valuable was he really?

The league noticed. Jordan finished 2nd to Magic Johnson in the MVP voting that year.

Though to be fair, maybe you do think Jordan deserved it in 87. In which case you see a good comparison.

I'm just saying that like 40 points, a Triple Double might mean less than it appears.

:ld:

I'll let @The Dankster speak for himself tho.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,050
Reputation
2,468
Daps
133,064
Westbrook is having a great season seemingly at the expense of the team.

Is anyone in OKC playing better because of Westbrook?

Just asking.
:mjlol: at these " is anyone playing better due to his play" arguments these are always the most foolish arguments. yes in fact they're playing better due to him. we are one of the worst teams in the league when he's off the floor. team is -9.4 when he's off the floor ; rockets is actually a +5.7 when hardens off the floor. see the difference :ohhh:
 

inndaskKy

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
11,895
Reputation
2,705
Daps
42,756
Reppin
NULL
So the best player's productivity isn't the reason they're winning?:russ:

Defense is the strong suit of the team according to analytics and eye test and Westbrook has the least contested shots of any player playing 30+ minutes in the NBA. He therefore contributes the least on that team defensively. He is the offense, without him their record would drop. But they are his defense, without them he'd be Demarcus Cousins status, never making the playoffs but putting up big numbers.
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
80,270
Reputation
24,522
Daps
363,347
:mjlol: at these " is anyone playing better due to his play" arguments these are always the most foolish arguments. yes in fact they're playing better due to him. we are one of the worst teams in the league when he's off the floor. team is -9.4 when he's off the floor ; rockets is actually a +5.7 when hardens off the floor. see the difference :ohhh:

I don't think this means what you think it means in the larger picture tho.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,050
Reputation
2,468
Daps
133,064
I don't think this means what you think it means in the larger picture tho.
please explain why the thunder falls off the cliff when westbrook sits if he's not optimal
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,692
Daps
203,919
Reppin
the ether
So the best player's productivity isn't the reason they're winning?:russ:

Do you really believe rebounds and assists are a perfect major of a player's productivity?

Is Russell chasing rebounds instead of playing defense helping the team or hurting the team? You've seen the videos - can you seriously tell me that playing that way makes the team better?

There are a LOT of ways to measure productivity. Creating shots while limiting turnovers, making shots while limiting misses, getting offensive boards, getting contested boards, playing good defense, etc. Whether Russ gets a trip or not doesn't tell you whether those things happened.

When Russ gets blown out and shuts down early, he doesn't get a triple double. When the other team misses a lot of shots, he gets more boards. THAT is why his triple doubles come on wins and not losses. It has nothing to do with him playing differently in wins, it is just about staying in the game long enough and the other team missing shots.



Some of these arguments don't make sense...His triple doubles don't equal more wins yet the Thunder have a way better record when he accomplishes a triple double vs the games he doesn't.
They have a WINNIING record when he gets a triple double and LOSING record when he doesn't .

Seems to me the whole team is better when he balls out.:youngsabo:

If you dont understand then I don't know what to say. You didn't read my posts or just didn't understand them.

Just answer this. What do you think Russ is doing in the trip-dub games that he's failing to do in losses. How do you actually think he's playing different?



I think Russ numbers are impressive. I've been looking at him statistically wondering how wall can get there but the more i look at it the less im enamoured .

His rebounds are coming off silly schemes, hes ball watching and thinking more about rebounds.

Hes playing very little defense and again neglects D to chase stats.. So his numbers would be better but he has made the team worse in that play.

I have some qualms with his assists and points in the sense that his choices are bad and are mostly dictated by chasing numbers.

He takes a ton of shots. When he on hell get 57 points on 40 shots or whatever but when he's off.. I watched them play the wizards aftee wondering what John can do to close this supposed gap. John played like a pg and run the team in a balanced way and generally played the right way. Russ shot okc out the game and it reached a point they had missed so many shots in a row the game was a blow out and Russ was shutdown early for good.

He can likely get the MVP becsuse his team has totally given him the reigns and sold out to get him his numbers. So he is the most valuable to the team.

Now he can do what he wants
:francis:

Yup.
 
Top