Angel On The Rag
I'm bloody hungry!!
Garnett should be around 60-75
Garnett should be around 60-75
Kobe/TMac was more popular of a debate, because they were exciting perimeter players. Two of the more popular players at the time. Duncan was the ole boring big man. He wasn't that popular.
I feel like a lot of these nikkas didn't watch KG around that time, maybe they were too young? nikkas are just shytting on him left in right in these threads....
hell no. not sure if he is top 50 tbh
Just look at how the rankings were back then. Look at the fan poll too.
Top 50 players: Lean and hungry Shaq back to No. 1 - NBA - CBSSports.com News, Scores, Stats, Fantasy Advice
nikkas trying to rewrite history.
There was a huge one. There is a reason why KG and Duncan match ups were always shown on national tv.
That shows you how close those debates were. Kobe was routinely ranked higher than Tmac, but there was still a debate.This doesn't support your point at all.
All this shows is that KG was considered the second best PF and the 3rd best player overall.
If one guy is ALWAYS ranked ahead of the other, how the fukk is there a huge debate about who's better?
I agree. Still doesn't mean debates weren't taking place. Kobe was better than Tmac every single year of his career to me, but debates were still taking place.The only year KG was better then Duncan was 2004
He won a chip in 08' but he was just solid in that playoffs, and was apart of superteam with Pierce and Allen
I agree. Still doesn't mean debates weren't taking place. Kobe was better than Tmac every single year of his career to me, but debates were still taking place.
That shows you how close those debates were. Kobe was routinely ranked higher than Tmac, but there was still a debate.
kg could've won finals mvp in 08' nobody would've blinked an eye. WAY better than just solid, consider he put up 21 and 13 in the 4 wins in the finals. he was definitely the playoff mvp
Skill and Talent wise, kobes been the best NBA player since 2001-2010