Duck Dynasty: TV pastor points out demonic nature of homosexuality, liberals foam at mouth..

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,363
Reputation
1,890
Daps
12,842
Reppin
NULL
Who cares whether a bunch of slave owners based the constitution on a book of mythology anyway this the 21st century bruh
no one cares. someone made the fatal mistake of reposting that lie about separation of church and state. he had to be corrected so people can stop spreading that false info.
 

Hiphoplives4eva

Solid Gold Dashikis
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,423
Reputation
3,850
Daps
152,082
Reppin
black love, unity, and music
it doesn't matter if something PRE-dates the bible. YOUR forefathers are using what THEY KNEW. they knew the bible. chuuch, etc. that's al they knew. you only know what you know. that's what you go on. So saying "such and such predates the bible" is irrelevant to my point. if a muslim kid only knew islam, yet we know their are other religions that predate islam. it wouldn't matter. his laws in his nation building would be based on that Islamic law that he was raised on. why? because that's all he knows. why is this so hard to grasp? you don't have to like it.

but here's some more food for thought. don't get mad. it is what it is. church goers, bible lovers, and God worshippers. of course they would start a nation like this.



and..

^^John adams said it, not Sam adams..
lets look again



There's nothing to debate. it is what it is


Thank you. Truly an intelligent poster. Anyone with a modicum of knowledge regarding the history of England knows it was an extremely religious country during its inception. Hell they even had an official religion! People act as if Christianty had no influence during the creation of the western world....:bryan:
 

Hiphoplives4eva

Solid Gold Dashikis
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,423
Reputation
3,850
Daps
152,082
Reppin
black love, unity, and music
:umad:

YOUR LIST IS MOSTLY BULLshyt AND I ADMITTED, IN GOOD FAITH, THAT THE BLUE LAWS ARE AN EXAMPLE OF BIBLE-BASED LEGISLATION, BROTHER! I'M NOT GOING THROUGH THE LIST ONE-BY-ONE, DUDE! YOU HAVE TOO MUCH EMOTION INVESTED IN TRYING TO SCHOOL HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN ABOUT RELIGIOSITY IN AMERICAN LEGAL HISTORY ON CHRISTMAS EVE, MEAN GENE! I HOPE YOU RECEIVE SOME NICE GIFTS AND HAVE TIME TO SPEND WITH LOVED ONES, BROTHER!

:umad:

So after repeatedly asking for a list you refuse to go trough it.

This is the reasons why discussions on here rarely ever actually lead to some sort of rational conclusion. I hope you enjoyed celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ today Victor...

Merry Christmas evrybody!!!
 

Berniewood Hogan

IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
17,983
Reputation
6,869
Daps
88,323
Reppin
nWg
So after repeatedly asking for a list you refuse to go trough it.
I READ THE LIST, SAW THAT MOST OF IT WAS NONSENSE, AND ADMITTED THAT ONE ENTRY ON IT WAS PROBABLY ACCURATE, BROTHER! AND I NEVER ASKED FOR A LIST, DUDE! I ASKED RAPBEATS IF HE COULD NAME A BIBLICAL PRINCIPLE UPON WHICH A US LAW IS BASED, SINCE HE HAD EARLIER CLAIMED THAT AMERICAN LAWS ARE BASED ON SUCH PRINCIPLES, DUDE! AND HE COULDN'T DO THAT, MEAN GENE! HE HAD TO TAG IN GOOGLE, JACK! MERRY CHRISTMAS, BROTHER!
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,031
Reputation
8,069
Daps
120,240
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Napoleon said:
thats how you skirt around it huh? You're ok with them killing gays cause you just dont wanna "impose"

:ufdup:

strawman.jpg
 

Digga38

The seperation between what's fake and what's real
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
8,601
Reputation
-1,270
Daps
7,985
Reppin
Dub-C
This cac, star of the one of the most watched tv shows in America, is saying Blacks were happier picking cotton and all but denies the Black struggle but you're bothered by the liberal response.:patrice:
u act like nikkaz wasnt shucking and jiving for the man.....

its his experience its what he saw...and thats not out of the realm of possibility
 

Digga38

The seperation between what's fake and what's real
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
8,601
Reputation
-1,270
Daps
7,985
Reppin
Dub-C
What would the real message be? Defending a man, whom if the world went according to his view points, would probably have you lynched along side the same homosexuals you despise?

Is that the message here?
where is he saying lynch homosexuals please point this out
 

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,363
Reputation
1,890
Daps
12,842
Reppin
NULL
Thank you. Truly an intelligent poster. Anyone with a modicum of knowledge regarding the history of England knows it was an extremely religious country during its inception. Hell they even had an official religion! People act as if Christianty had no influence during the creation of the western world....:bryan:
some WISH it didnt have any influence. thats the problem.

but you know what, the fact that you have people in the US that believes this is a tribute to the US' idea of freedom. people really believe this country was so free, that it was free from all religious based thought when coming up with rules/regs for this society. so with that said, we can all agree the US forefathers did a darn good job of selling "FREEDOM" to all of us.

YOu are only as free as what you've been taught/told/learned. if all you know is philosophy and chuuch. thats all you can run with. it baffles me how some can make this argument at all.

i mean how many "God this or creator that" do you need in your constitution? how many do you need in these states constitution. some of these dudes were bible thumpers to the nth degree. but at least they were not down with religious oppression per se. thats because they were being oppressed in their home country. its the same reason why black folks if we were to ever be in charge of the US or the entire world.. we would not oppress (In general) a bunch of white people or any other people. Since we've recently been oppressed, so we know how it feels. thats how it usually works.

now lets say this for the last time. when they spoke of CHURCH or RELIGION back then. they were really not talking about "ALL" religions.

They were talking about 2 things. NO Religion & Different Christian-esk denomiations.
So in context when you hear freedom of religion. they are not talking about freedom to practice islam. Sure you can make that stretch if you like. But thats not what THEY were talking about BACK THEN. It was a bunch of dudes that came from one country forcing them to be down with one denomination of Christianity and thats it. anything else and you catching heat. So they wanted to make darn sure they made up a country where people could shout in the pews or hum hyms quietly if they like. your choice, your church. thats what it meant. so of course these dudes would create laws based on that good book among other things. but those laws are inspired by the good book and religious things they were taught since they were kids. You only know...what you know.
 

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,363
Reputation
1,890
Daps
12,842
Reppin
NULL
his comments werent rascist...u need reading comprehension
yes they were. you need "read between the lines" comprehension skills. There are a lot of things white people do and say that are racist without being overtly racist.
any white person or person of non color telling people in general "blacks seem to be happier back when they were slaves." is a staunch racist. pure and simple. now you know. so never say so and so isnt being racist when you hear those words again. There will be no debate on that subject matter. its a racist statement to make. if a black person says it. its a "self hate" statement.

So move along.
 

Digga38

The seperation between what's fake and what's real
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
8,601
Reputation
-1,270
Daps
7,985
Reppin
Dub-C
However he justified it, you don't think anyone who wasn't a zoophile, a murderer, or a thief, wouldn't feel insulted at being compared specifically to all 3 of those things?
he says they all are immoral acts..if the shoe fits
 

Digga38

The seperation between what's fake and what's real
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
8,601
Reputation
-1,270
Daps
7,985
Reppin
Dub-C
yes they were. you need "read between the lines" comprehension skills. There are a lot of things white people do and say that are racist without being overtly racist.
any white person or person of non color telling people in general "blacks seem to be happier back when they were slaves." is a staunch racist. pure and simple. now you know. so never say so and so isnt being racist when you hear those words again. There will be no debate on that subject matter. its a racist statement to make. if a black person says it. its a "self hate" statement.

So move along.

Where you think the term uncle tom comes from?
 

ill

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
10,234
Reputation
462
Daps
17,295
Reppin
Mother Russia & Greater Israel
some WISH it didnt have any influence. thats the problem.

but you know what, the fact that you have people in the US that believes this is a tribute to the US' idea of freedom. people really believe this country was so free, that it was free from all religious based thought when coming up with rules/regs for this society. so with that said, we can all agree the US forefathers did a darn good job of selling "FREEDOM" to all of us.

YOu are only as free as what you've been taught/told/learned. if all you know is philosophy and chuuch. thats all you can run with. it baffles me how some can make this argument at all.

i mean how many "God this or creator that" do you need in your constitution? how many do you need in these states constitution. some of these dudes were bible thumpers to the nth degree. but at least they were not down with religious oppression per se. thats because they were being oppressed in their home country. its the same reason why black folks if we were to ever be in charge of the US or the entire world.. we would not oppress (In general) a bunch of white people or any other people. Since we've recently been oppressed, so we know how it feels. thats how it usually works.

now lets say this for the last time. when they spoke of CHURCH or RELIGION back then. they were really not talking about "ALL" religions.

They were talking about 2 things. NO Religion & Different Christian-esk denomiations.
So in context when you hear freedom of religion. they are not talking about freedom to practice islam. Sure you can make that stretch if you like. But thats not what THEY were talking about BACK THEN. It was a bunch of dudes that came from one country forcing them to be down with one denomination of Christianity and thats it. anything else and you catching heat. So they wanted to make darn sure they made up a country where people could shout in the pews or hum hyms quietly if they like. your choice, your church. thats what it meant. so of course these dudes would create laws based on that good book among other things. but those laws are inspired by the good book and religious things they were taught since they were kids. You only know...what you know.


Influence DOES NOT EQUAL America being a Christian nation and running on Christian laws. FOH fakkit :camby:

The founders didn't have Islam in mind? No shyt, sherlock. The part they had in mind is that you can practice ANY religion freely REGARDLESS of what it was or even if they were aware of that religion. Go say ten hail mary's for your ignorant sins.
 

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,363
Reputation
1,890
Daps
12,842
Reppin
NULL
Influence DOES NOT EQUAL America being a Christian nation and running on Christian laws. FOH fakkit :camby:

The founders didn't have Islam in mind? No shyt, sherlock. The part they had in mind is that you can practice ANY religion freely REGARDLESS of what it was or even if they were aware of that religion. Go say ten hail mary's for your ignorant sins.
there's nothing to debate. i dont care how many times yall bring up this misinformation. you're wrong.
 
Top