So you admit the "blog" I posted was a source then, right? lol Of course even the Washington Post cites the "blog" for the figure given for the average income, and Nate Silver got the data from the poll results pulled by Edison Research, I already stated that. Seems you are just arguing just to argue, you already admitting to misquoting Trump during that speech don't see why it's so hard to admit the "blog" was a credible source which you just did in this post. I never said the link you posted was incorrect, go back and read and you will see I was just linking the original "blog" from which that figure came from.
In the results of the poll, there was no correlation between incomes and support for Trump among Republican and GOP-inclined independent voters, 34 percent of whom supported the front-runner. That was no surprise, given the data from exit polls. Based on those findings, Five Thirty Eight's Nate Silver has estimated that the average household income among Trump supporters is $72,000 a year, well above the national median.
Let me teach you have to read.
The first sentence is in reference to the ABC poll. The second sentence are them stating their results came at no surprise do to the data already gathered by he exit poll, which Nate Silver based his estimations on.
What is hard for you to understand?
What point are trying to make seriously
I acknowledged I misheard trump, but the whole point was trump's supporters are not struggling for the most part, and are not the white trash hicks being portrayed.
You are the one arguing for nothing, just to avoid that fact
all you had to do was acknowledge the fact
I merely stated Nate Silver wasn't a source, because he got his information from polls which are the source and posted it on his blog
ABC did their own poll outside of the exit polls and came back with similar results