I'll just let this explain it, pulled from Reddit, but these are opinions I've held for years about West and posters can attest I've said as much for a long time:
He was a lead guard, in contrast to an off-guard.
The distinction of point/shooting is one way of simplistically dividing duties, but the lead/off distinction has a long history as well. West typically both his team’s lead passer and the primary guard scorer, and when a player is both, this is called a “lead guard”.
In today’s game this is actually pretty typical and more often than not gets called “point guard”, but if the player is larger sometimes other terms get used.
If West happened to play with a smaller guard, he might get called a shooting guard today, but that would not change what his job on the court was.
Neither Ray nor Reggie were better players than Clyde. Neither of those guys were #2s on championship teams and all had burn as #1s but only Glide took teams to The Finals as a #1. This is to say nothing of the fact that Glide was twice a Top 5 MVP finalist, including a runner-up---->neither Ray nor Reggie were ever in legit MVP discussion...
Pierce also wasn't better than Glide. Glide led 3 WCF runs as a #1, he was just a better scorer and first option to have than Pierce as your #1...
Bruh are you being dense on purpose?
In Rd1 vs Chicago, Shaq averaged 20-11, including a 30-20-5 game in the closeout G6. No washed C is giving you 30 and 20...
In the ECF vs Detroit Shaq was 22-11, including 28-16 in the closeout G6 that sent Miami to its first NBA Finals. No washed C is giving you 28-16 to clinch a Finals trip...
To be clear, my point is not that Shaq was LA Shaq, if you saw me say that quote it. My point isnt even that he wasnt a declining player---->he clearly was...
But saying Shaq was washed when he got to Miami is objectively false, he was runner-up for MVP and Miami's best player his first season and got them to an ECF, and in his second year he was still 20-9 in the regular season, and 18-10 in the playoffs. He wasn't at his peak and was definitely at the end of his prime but post-prime guys don't finish Top 2 in MVP, and post-prime guys arent posting 30-20 and 28-16 games in elimination playoff games...
Calling Shaq washed when he arrived in Miami undermines how critical he was to fulfilling championship goals for a team with no championship background. As others have pointed out, he was still the best player at his position in basketball, the mistake you're making is comparing Miami Shaq to LA Shaq and expecting the same level of production...
Nobody thinks he was LA Shaq...
MVP does matter, bruh. It's not the only thing that matters but it's relevant, as is how often you are a legit MVP candidate...
That said you could make the argument that Russ and Nash are both better than Glide, just like you can make the argument Glide is better than both. There is no dramatic separation between those three guys on a historical scale...