Trains make for great intermediate travel. Easily the best form for intermediate distance.
I’m from LA, wife is from SD. At some point I determined taking the consistent 2 hour train ride vs the erratic 1 to 3 hour drive was far more convenient, less hassle, consistent and far better overall. One of the last times I took that drive during the day I spent 8 hours on the road to drive from Culver City. 8 hours to drive ~110 miles is crazy (405 traffic through LA, 22 and 55 traffic through OC due to detour, 5 traffic through South OC and Oceanside then 805 traffic through SD). When it’s all clear it’s usually 1hr 15 min - 1.5 hours flat. Problem is that usually only happens around 1AM.
I wouldn’t take a plane for anything less than 3 hours driving but driving that long is annoying af, especially when it can get blown up with traffic. Train is ideal. I saved so much time and energy when choosing not to drive. That’s when I learned to write better software because I was able to do more than stare at brake lights for hours. Turned potentially a round trip of 6 hours of traffic and more downtime into 4 hours of active productivity. I don’t want to drive anything over 2 hours anymore, that’s too much life to waste, even 1.5 hours pushes it. Now scale that up for people who take commutes like that every week, for years. How much useless time spent is that?
Now a bullet train or high speed rail? shyt, I’d have taken one in a heartbeat. You can even commute to work between SoCal and NorCal with that. Before going remote it used to take me an hour to drive from Inglewood to LA for work. You mean to tell me I can get back from SF in the same amount of time via train, while actually putting those two hours to use to and from everyday?