I'm really curious about who will lead Russia post-Putin. Seems like they pendulum from wild leader to chill leader.
Only thing this did was expose joe bidens trifling ass and obama too.
Shouldn't have been killing ethnic Russians in the east. Now those areas belong to Russia and no NATO membership for them. All that bloodshed, death and infrastructure destruction and Ukraine accomplished nothing but being 100 billion in debt and Ukrainians of child bearing & fighting ages scattered all over Europe.
Anyway the smart Coli brehs were telling you the obvious since the war started but y'all were busy spreading NATO babble.
I'm really curious about who will lead Russia post-Putin. Seems like they pendulum from wild leader to chill leader.
The fukk does Obama have to do with this
What has Russia accomplished? Hundreds of thousands of their youth dead when they are already in demographic decline? United Europe? NATO stronger than ever? Governing a burnt out territory where everyone hates them? What happens after Putin?Shouldn't have been killing ethnic Russians in the east. Now those areas belong to Russia and no NATO membership for them. All that bloodshed, death and infrastructure destruction and Ukraine accomplished nothing but being 100 billion in debt and Ukrainians of child bearing & fighting ages scattered all over Europe.
Anyway the smart Coli brehs were telling you the obvious since the war started but y'all were busy spreading NATO babble.
simply not trueManpower isn’t the issue for Ukraine. Equipment is.
Faulty premise. Russia isn’t the 1939 Soviet Empire. If Russia had such vast manpower reserves they wouldn’t be losing territory in the south due to having to shift manpower to Adviinka. They may have more manpower than Ukraine but the notion that they have time on their side when they are fighting a war on Ukrainian territory is about as accurate as saying the Americans could wait out the Vietnamese.and just think logically, russia has a much larger military reserve and even more drunks and criminals than ukraine can ever muster. a war of attrition is inherently a bad deal for ukraine which is why time is not on the side of ukraine. ukraine needs either a decisive victory or a political crisis within russia. until then, russia can just run up the clock on them.
You want the guy that calls black people baboons to keep an eye on me. Keep scraping the bottom of the barrel.@Billy Ocean keep your eye on this one
Perfection.
Ancient, out of touch, rapidly decaying, unaware of simple facts about material reality on the ground in the twenty first century.
You have weirdly wrong and backwards ideas about certain current events, breh. You are otherwise a smart and funny guy.
Before 2014, Ukraine's freely and fairly democratically elected government was considering buddying up to Russia a little bit. Given simple geography, this seemed like the best option to them. NATO said "fukk that!" and engineered a coup that installed a right wing reactionary government. American media misreported this as a popular uprising, of course.
A couple years later they get a literal comedian installed as president. It's all bullshyt. Putin is not a good guy in any way. Well, except for that time he said "Street rap may be a bit tough, but it has an important message about social change." But NATO is the continuation of fascism on the continent. Operation Gladio stuff.
Ukraine was, to a great extent, a willing and happy participant in the Holocaust. After WW2, a whole bunch of Ukrainian Nazis escaped to Canada.
And what have they been doing since then?
State Department dyck sucka.Russian fakkit babble
State Department dyck sucka.
Shouldn't have been killing ethnic Russians in the east. Now those areas belong to Russia and no NATO membership for them. All that bloodshed, death and infrastructure destruction and Ukraine accomplished nothing but being 100 billion in debt and Ukrainians of child bearing & fighting ages scattered all over Europe.