To your first point I’m not conflating or distorting her points.
Yes, you are, because she made two separate points, introducing the second one with, "The reality also is this:". You are conflating her two seperate points and pretending they're the same point.
Any time politicians start saying this will disproportionately help black people that means it is a high tide lifts all boats argument.
This is FALSE.
en.wikipedia.org
The "rising tide lifts all boats" phrase was used to support the claim that general improvement of the economy helps everyone, and was especially used by free-market economists. It was NOT used to describe measures that target people who are disproportionately in need, that's literally the opposite kind of help.
She is not endorsing targeted legislation, go back up a history book and learn why targeted legislation with specific groups in mind is important for real societal gains.
She
can't endorse any race-specific legislation right now because:
A) The Supreme Court has declared that race-specific help is unconstitutional
B) The majority of centrists/undecided votes are against it and it would hurt her chances of election
But what she HAS done is say more than once in the past that Black people
deserve reparations and that she'll look into it as president. She does not want to focus her words on anything remotely like that right now because you can't do jack shyt if you take an L in the election.
Why are you so insistent that she virtue-signal with promises that would be impossible to fulfill and that would cause her to lose?
There has been multiple studies down on reparations. Saying you’re going to do a study is kicking the can down the road so you don’t have to deal with it but still saying you did something.
Then why is there no agreement among reparations supporters as to how much should be given, or how it should be given? Someone in this thread said $30 trillion, do you agree with that as the figure or not?
The government has never done a study on reparations, and if it were as meaningless a thing as you claim, then it would have happened already, but conservatives and centrists oppose it vehemently.