Angry Democratic Donors Turn Off The Flow Of Money - “I’ll be blunt here: The Democratic Party is f‑‑‑ing terrible

[FukkaPaidEmail]

You'd never see Republicans on social media telling everyone to not vote for Trump. They'll vote happily for Trump then figure out how to get Trump to do their bidding later but, Progressives have repeatedly and consistently sabotaged Democrats. I can't stand those bishes

The conservative architect of the single most impactful conflict of the 21st century and the damn near the face of modern evil not only endorsed Kamala Harris but ran around saying don’t vote for Trump..Funny thing is ppl were called MAGA for saying that person shouldn’t be around

Not only is that post a lie ..it’s an egregious one .


The fact isn’t all republicans vote republican no matter what ..it’s that the republican base continued to stand on what they believed from 2007 until they took the party over from the John Boehner/Eric Cantor and Paul Ryan group

The big money on that side announced that group as the future …and their base said “nah fukk that” and systemically got rid of them . When the big money realized they couldn’t stop it they joined in

then they got what they wanted ..Trump and MAGA ..


—

This thread and most centrists sound just like those washed republicans from a decade ago saying “ we should just get rid of MAGA” …when getting rid of MAGA would’ve killed their party .

Getting rid of progressives will kill the Democratic Party.

 

[Ozymandeas]

The conservative architect of the single most impactful conflict of the 21st century not only endorsed Kamala Harris but ran around saying don’t vote for Trump

Not only is that post a lie ..it’s an egregious one .


The fact isn’t all republicans vote republican no matter what ..it’s that the republican base continued to stand on what they believed from 2007 until they took the party over from the John Boehner/Eric Cantor and Paul Ryan .

The big money on that side announced that group the future …and their base said “nah fukk that” and systemically got rid of them . When the big money realized they couldn’t stop it they joined in

then they got what they wanted ..Trump and MAGA ..


—

This thread and most centrists sound just like those washed republicans from a decade ago saying “ we should just get rid of MAGA” …when getting rid of MAGA would’ve killed their party .

Getting rid of progressives will kill the Democratic Party.

No, it's not. You see what you want to see. I frequent conservative platforms and liberal platforms.

Only on the liberal platforms were people saying "I'm not supporting genocide. I'm not convinced by Kamala. I'm voting third-party". You had tons and tons and tons of young "Progressives" on YouTube and TikTok giving those sentiments. People that are supposed to be allies.

Now compare that to the Racist, Far Right, Red Pill, MAGA White Boys. How many of them were saying don't vote for Trump.

NONE. THEY ALL VOTED FOR TRUMP.

Fukk Progressives. Worthless group of people.

 

[Eternally Jaded]

First, no mainstream candidate is centering their campaign around these issues, but right-wing media amplifies these talking points to create the illusion that they are. This is done to distract and keep people focused on manufactured outrage rather actual issues.

Second, the idea that Democrats are pushing "over 1,000 genders" or universally replacing "mother" with "birthing people" is a deliberate distortion. In reality, gender identity is a niche academic discussion, not a pillar of any major political campaign. These are medical and legal terms used by professionals in very specific contexts, but it is not a widespread political initiative. These are exaggerations designed to create resentment rather than reflect reality.

Third, the claim that transgender athletes are simply "mentally ill male athletes" is deliberately inflammatory and designed to drive outrage. It ignores the actual policies being debated and the existence of transgender people altogether. If the concern were truly about women's sports, then equal funding, stopping sexual abuse in athletics, and addressing pay disparities would be the focus, yet these issues are rarely mentioned by those who claim to care. Instead, they zoom in on something that affects a statistically tiny percentage of athletes, and treat it as if it's an existential crisis, while ignoring far larger and more pervasive issues in women's sports. This selective outrage reveals that the goal is not fairness in competition but rather the use of transgender people as a political scapegoat.

Finally, the phrase "pro-deviant messaging" exposes what this is really about. Politicians should not try to satisfy people's religious beliefs. Your framing of marginalized people as "abnormal" and "immoral" is fukking foul. What you're doing is no different from how bad-faith actors twist other discussions to turn complex social issues into fear-driven caricatures to justify hostility. Instead of engaging with reality, you're distorting and exaggerating to create an enemy, because it is easier to vilify people than to offer something meaningful.

The biggest problem is the world is so small now.

In the 90s a candidate could speak to fringe minorities like LGBTQ in town halls and other focused outreach and reassure them that their vote matters and what matters to them is heard(this didn't happen but it could've) and yet the overall platform wouldn't be tarred with fixation on these fringe elements.

Now? Via social media and all these news sources?

What should be small gets blown up to become focuses, and the media doesn't help as they will ALWAYS go with the juicier angles and this is how the democratic party has now become the tranny fixated party.

Look at @cacmamba n others.

Fixated on a fringe that doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things as "ruining" the party.

And the opposing party in bad faith revels in it.

And since the Fairness Doctrine is dead, there's zero pushback when this bullshyt happens.

 

[Rasille]

 

[KillerPups]

the only Democrat standing on business is Bernie.

but they said he was too old to get the nomination 8 years ago.

 

[IGSaint12]

The border issue was such an own goal. It was Trump's number 1 talking point in the election. I firmly believe if Biden shutdown the border and didn't do the cbpone app shyt that Trump would probably not have won. The border issue was mismanaged so badly that if the border becomes a wedge issue again in the future, Democrats will lose on it because of the perception they built over the last 4 years due to Biden's policy.

People on this forum may not care about this issue but it IS a key issue to get swing states in a presidential election. I'm still aghast at Democrats in one breath say that a person like Trump should never be president yet not doing everything possible to stop his biggest election talking point. If they were serious about Trump being such a threat to American democracy then they should have took the border more seriously.

 

[Squirrel from Meteor Man]

the only Democrat standing on business is Bernie.

but they said he was too old to get the nomination 8 years ago.

He had a chance to win the primary multiple times and he didn’t do it.

He’s been in government for 50 years and no one can point to something he’s actually accomplished. Talks a good game but what has he done?

 

[Squirrel from Meteor Man]

simply put, the Dems have a massive image problem, and it's all the far left's fault

i wouldn't even admit to voting Democrat in real life. it's become far too embarrassing

75 million people voted democratically (double entendre don’t ask me how) this past election. Probably more once the voter fraud/manipulation is completely uncovered.

You’re more embarrassed to admit you’re a Republican (or a wannabe) than you are a democrat, which is why you mask your Trump support behind democrat vitriol.

 

[DonB90]

The border issue was such an own goal. It was Trump's number 1 talking point in the election. I firmly believe if Biden shutdown the border and didn't do the cbpone app shyt that Trump would probably not have won. The border issue was mismanaged so badly that if the border becomes a wedge issue again in the future, Democrats will lose on it because of the perception they built over the last 4 years due to Biden's policy.

People on this forum may not care about this issue but it IS a key issue to get swing states in a presidential election. I'm still aghast at Democrats in one breath say that a person like Trump should never be president yet not doing everything possible to stop his biggest election talking point. If they were serious about Trump being such a threat to American democracy then they should have took the border more seriously.

Bingo. I've never seen a party create a political liability the way Dems did during Bidens tenure with their handling of the border, just gross incompetence

 

[Max Power]

Come on bro, you the pot call the kettle black:

You were trying to call out a user for having an Asian fetish but your have the same fetish.....Projection is a motherfukker huh

Spoiler

Lulu Chu:

Gia Dibelle:

The hypocrisy of these motherfukkers

He's like @Professor Emeritus but substitute the white wife for a porn fetish

At least he likes p*ssy, I thought he was just a fakkit.

 

[23Barrettcity]

Right now, democrats are just waiting for republicans to fukk up something that makes most people mad.
Despite all the media coverage, the current administration hasn’t done anything to piss off that many people.

Everyone is like so far.

Some of us are mad at the federal jobs being taken away but most of us can’t even imagine having a job that good, so it means nothing that those jobs are gone.
We don’t care that much about how the next man is doing.

Exactly. A lot of Trump voters or people who don’t care haven’t felt it enough to complain . I still see people being like they do waste a lot of money in the Feds and good immigrants should go or for some reason worried about trans people

Please don't quote me with this nonsense. That is not the problem. Why do you guys want them to adopt that kind of bigotry?

Yes apparently. It’s crazy

 

[Soldier]

Nah, Republicans are segmented as well. You have the Rinos/Moderate Republicans. They're about conservatism, capitalism, and the military. Some of them are just about two of those three. Then you have the Christians/Religious groups. They're single-issue voters. They're about family values. Then you have the MAGAs. They're the evolution of the Tea Party. Absolute crazies who ended up becoming front and center of the Republican Party. The difference between Republicans and Democrats is.........(and please read this part).........REPUBLICANS VOTE REPUBLICAN NO MATTER WHAT. The Mitt Romney types, the crazy Alex Jones types, the Sarah Palin types. They will all vote Republican. Democrats are idiots because Progressives (it's usually them), Liberals, and Moderates will not fall in line behind a candidate. TBH, Democrats would be better off if we kicked Progressives out of our party You'd never see Republicans on social media telling everyone to not vote for Trump. They'll vote happily for Trump then figure out how to get Trump to do their bidding later but, Progressives have repeatedly and consistently sabotaged Democrats. I can't stand those bishes

Democrats fall in and out of love. They’re more individualistic, finicky and won’t support the dems if their faction doesn’t control the party politically and ideologically. Progressives refused to support Clinton, Biden and Harris in three straight elections as soon as their favorite candidate Bernie Sanders got taken out early in the primaries. Unfortunately, under their umbrella, the Dems have to please a lot of people that wouldn’t associate with each other in real life without the affiliations of the Democratic Party. Transgender activists, Gay rights activists, Bernie Bros, green peace/ecologists, Jews, Indians, Asians, upper class educated white liberals, latin American lobby groups, and regular Black Americans have nothing in common with each other. It’s hard for any party to keep in line different groups of people with different interests and keep them all on the same page. On the republican side, they seem politically homogeneous except for MAGA. That’s why they find an easier way to forget their very small ideological differences and join forces together. What are the differences between the mitt Romney types, the neocons dikk Cheney types, the pro business/conservative types, and the family values/christian types? Not much. They’re all mostly white and moderate center-right/right conservatives. They’re mostly more or less cultural Christians. They have many things in common from a racial, political, financial, cultural and social point of view. The only exception among the republican party is the loud and proud maga cult who is a far-right populist and white nationalist/nativist movement led by a socially authoritarian dictator like trump. The final evolution of the Obama birther/Tea Party movement as you said.

But it’s true that Republicans always fall in line and never get out of line. They will always be loyal to the chosen candidate of the gop no matter what. They keep their focus and eyes on the prize, victory, unlike many myopic and chronically online dems who always want to prove a point and fight for ideological purity. They’re too dogmatic for their own good, republicans are more pragmatic. Progressive democrats in particular had tunnel vision and bushed Harris for her stance on Gaza meanwhile many republican voters saw the bigger picture and still got behind trump despite not liking him as a candidate and not liking his policies.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

First, no mainstream candidate is centering their campaign around these issues, but right-wing media amplifies these talking points to create the illusion that they are. This is done to distract and keep people focused on manufactured outrage rather actual issues.

DO you support men in women’s sports?

Second, the idea that Democrats are pushing "over 1,000 genders" or universally replacing "mother" with "birthing people" is a deliberate distortion. In reality, gender identity is a niche academic discussion, not a pillar of any major political campaign. These are medical and legal terms used by professionals in very specific contexts, but it is not a widespread political initiative. These are exaggerations designed to create resentment rather than reflect reality.

OK, so do you support it or not? Don’t tell me now niche it is. Tell me what you support.

Third, the claim that transgender athletes are simply "mentally ill male athletes" is deliberately inflammatory and designed to drive outrage. It ignores the actual policies being debated and the existence of transgender people altogether.

Their existence isn’t being challenged. Their participation in certain realms is. Is Title IX discriminatory, now?

If the concern were truly about women's sports, then equal funding,

Nothing to do with trans participation

stopping sexual abuse in athletics,

Nothing to do with trans participation

and addressing pay disparities would be the focus,

nothing to do with trans participation

yet these issues are rarely mentioned by those who claim to care. Instead, they zoom in on something that affects a statistically tiny percentage of athletes, and treat it as if it's an existential crisis, while ignoring far larger and more pervasive issues in women's sports.

Does the number of trans participants matter if that number keeps increasing?

This selective outrage reveals that the goal is not fairness in competition but rather the use of transgender people as a political scapegoat.

Do you support transgender participation in women’s sports?

Finally, the phrase "pro-deviant messaging" exposes what this is really about. Politicians should not try to satisfy people's religious beliefs. Your framing of marginalized people as "abnormal" and "immoral" is fukking foul. What you're doing is no different from how bad-faith actors twist other discussions to turn complex social issues into fear-driven caricatures to justify hostility. Instead of engaging with reality, you're distorting and exaggerating to create an enemy, because it is easier to vilify people than to offer something meaningful.

I don’t believe in god. Do you support transgender participation in women's sports and restrooms and other spaces designated for women?

 

[NinoBrown]

It's not rocket science, it's optics not politics, put a younger man in his 40s/50s as a Dem nominee and Trump would have been an angry old man yelling at the clouds and got wiped off the face of the planet....

Nah, we gotta play the progressive game....

Extreme Dems are the most selfish individuals, too short-sighted and emotional to see reason and logic.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I know we like to shyt on big money donors but in this instance it’s not the case

They were the ones that sounded the Biden alarm and got stalled out by the DNC until the noise got too loud to ignore


Big money wants to do one thing more than anything else …win

When it looked like Obama was about to take off..The Big money pressed the button.

Big money didn’t pick Hillary …that was the party making the call

Big money didn’t pick Joe over Bernie..that was the party making the call

Big money didn’t choose Kamala …that was the party making the call

The party isn’t tat powerful.

Hillary beat bernie in the primary. Same with Biden.

Kamala got picked cause there was 100 days.