So what is a flop then if its not coming in well below expectations?
Hell on Earth definitely underperformed in some respects, but its way more of a mixed bag than Missy.
- The album debuted in the top ten - Infamous did not
- The singles didn't outperform Infamous - but they all charted in the teens if memory serves me right. The disparity wasn't as stark as with Missy.
Would you agree with me that Missy's second album underperformed? Didn't meet expectations?
The key word is expectations. A flop isn't a flop because you, I, or random people says it's a flop. To me a flop is an artist that sells significantly less than the previous after the current album's cycle. It's also based on the situation. Like, I can't call
Nellyville a flop, even though it sold significantly less than
Country Grammar because few artists were doing
Nellyville numbers during that era. Something like Juve's
G Code would be a flop because it was a significant drop from
400 Degreez and it wasn't like he was selling more than everybody else with those numbers.
And this is where your bias comes in, which is why your assessment of Missy isn't to be taken seriously. You're in here making concessions for Mobb and saying they underperformed, but are saying that Missy flopped. And it's not a mixed bag. The singles from
Da Real World outperformed the singles from
Supa Dupa Fly.
I can't say that Missy flopped with the second album because it still did what the first album did. It just took longer. On the same token, I wouldn't call Mobb a flop.