Bruh, just as a lawyer is more qualified to argue on your behalf than your lawn mowing brother, you need someone with expertise in that field to represent you.
In no way am i saying they chose the correct person, but you do not want just anyone representing you, especially if they arent familiar with players and stakes.
You want someone close enough to the job to know what is required but not close enough where they get tunnel vision. The guy loading trucks may think new fans and an extra dollar are the highest priority asks and not an employee stock vesting plan or paternity leave.
No the fukk they aren’t. That’s literally propaganda.
The current labor laws and union issues only exist to make the process of running a union virtually impossible.
Those chosen to “advocate” in these ivory tower positions consistently manage to get absolutely nothing done. There’s a reason why workers don’t have shyt and are forced to strike for pennies.
They aren’t doing shyt, they haven’t done shyt, they will never do shyt that actually matters.
Perhaps you should look up the literal definition of what a union is. And the history of unions before liberal elitism infected US unions to the core.
The true strength of any union is in collective civil disobedience, not by following lame duck “law and order” procedure meant to curtail collective resistance.
Unions don’t need to right people to advocate for them. That’s literally a fukking oxymoron.
