With a TikTok Ban Looming, Users Flee to Chinese App ‘Red Note’

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
58,748
Reputation
8,661
Daps
162,828
Do you even understand concepts such as data at rest?

Anyway since you love ai summaries:


Transparency is a term you’ve seen me use multiple times.

the data sitting on Oracle's servers in the U.S?


 
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
8,044
Reputation
981
Daps
24,959
Reppin
Philadelphia
the CCP has no authority over any american outside of china or influence on anybody who doesn't have relatives in china so I don't see why that should stop m from using their search engine from time to time to find download links that google and bing block from their results.

i guess i'm no different from any foreigner who uses american web services eventhough the U.S incarcerates more people than any other country in the world even though we dont' have the largest population.

wheres china's guantanamo bay?

The whataboutism, the outright lies and you continually spamming the site is why people are questioning you are a bot. But if you are human then you are just a moron. I agree with @Pressure, just admit your admit you are addicted to social media to make this more easier on you.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
58,748
Reputation
8,661
Daps
162,828
the CCP has no authority over any american outside of china or influence on anybody who doesn't have relatives in china so I don't see why that should stop m from using their search engine from time to time to find download links that google and bing block from their results.

i guess i'm no different from any foreigner who uses american web services eventhough the U.S incarcerates more people than any other country in the world even though we dont' have the largest population.

wheres china's guantanamo bay?

The whataboutism, the outright lies and you continually spamming the site is why people are questioning you are a bot. But if you are human then you are just a moron. I agree with @Pressure, just admit your admit you are addicted to social media to make this more easier on you.

now i'm not human? :gucci:
expound on the lies? :feedme:

i'm not a member of any social media site and i've said this repeatedly already, they are data privacy nightmares.

my argument is irrespective of any social media platform or website. the government shouldn't be banning websites or apps that hasn't engaged in criminal wrongdoing.

you gonna accuse everybody who doesn't agree with censorship of being addicted to a website? :what:
 
Last edited:

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,270
Reputation
7,002
Daps
147,145
Reppin
CookoutGang

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
58,748
Reputation
8,661
Daps
162,828

:skip:

like i said before, facebook , instagram and twitter have a long had start when it comes to their platform being compromised.



5. Facebook​

Date: April 2021

Impact: 530 million users exposed

Although one of the world’s largest companies, Facebook is no stranger to data leaks and controversy. The social media giant has constantly dealt with security breaches of user data since the company went public in 2012.

The company’s massive data breach in April 2021 was one of its largest, leaking names, phone numbers, account names, and passwords of over 530 million people to the public. Facebook identified the problem in the platform’s tool to sync contacts, citing hackers exploiting a vulnerability to scrape user profiles for customer data.

Though Facebook maintained that no data had been compromised or misused, it’s impossible to verify since the information was public for a short period. Hackers or scammers can easily take advantage of unsuspecting users with just their names, phone numbers, and emails.

Since 2013, Facebook has faced multiple major data breaches, including:

  • In March 2019, information leaked that Facebook employees had access to over 600 million user accounts. Account IDs and passwords for both Facebook and Instagram were stored in plaintext files. Although Facebook claims no sensitive information was exposed, it was one more incident among many security issues.
  • In April 2019, the Cyber Risk team at UpGuard discovered 540 million unsecured Facebook user data records on public Amazon S3 cloud servers. Third-party app developer and Mexican media company Cultura Colectiva failed to password-protect their entire dataset, leaving the information open for anyone to access and download.
  • Although Facebook was not directly responsible for this incident, it brought scrutiny to how the social network managed third-party access to its database. Following a long history of data leaks, Facebook finally increased restrictions on third-party developers.
  • Just a few months later, more exposed records were found on a foreign server on the dark web. Further investigation found that a hacker group in Vietnam may have abused Facebook’s API and scraped the site for user IDs, names, and phone numbers. Over 300 million users were affected.

Facebook / Cambridge Analytica​

Date: April 2018

Impact: 50-90 million users exposed

In 2018, a British consulting firm, Cambridge Analytica, stole and sold data from 50-90 million user accounts on Facebook in one of the most high-profile cases in recent memory. Cambridge Analytica security researcher Aleksandr Kogan accessed this data through a loophole from a third-party quiz app. This loophole in Facebook’s API (application programming interface) allowed Kogan to compile data from anyone who downloaded the app and their entire friend network.

Despite going against the terms and conditions of Facebook, Cambridge Analytica continued to sell the data illegally because there was no rule enforcement. Reports show that Facebook was aware of the issue as early as 2015 but did not take action until Christopher Wylie, a Cambridge Analytica employee, blew the whistle.

Things finally came to a head when the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a historic $5 billion fine for Facebook’s continuous violation of data security and poor data protection practices. The FTC also mandated a complete restructuring from the top down to increase oversight of privacy compliance. Furthermore, the FTC filed a lawsuit against Cambridge Analytica, forcing CEO Alexander Nix to resign.

SEC Confirms SIM Swap Attack Behind X Account Takeover​


Threat actor is selling data on 5.4 million Twitter users for $30K on hacking forum​


If the threat actor is telling the truth, data from a quarter of all Instagram users is available on a cybercriminal forum.


On November 10th, a threat actor listed a dataset for sale on a notorious hacker forum, claiming it consists of records of 489 million Instagram users. Instagram has over two billion monthly active users, which means that if proven correct, the incident affects a quarter of all users.

September 2022: Irish Regulators Fine Instagram €405m for Data Privacy Violations​

In September 2022, Ireland’s Data Protection Commissioner leveled a €405 million fine against Meta for violating the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Specifically, the fine pertained to Instagram exposing children’s phone numbers and email addresses.

In response, Meta claimed that the violation in question had been resolved for over a year, and Meta has disputed the fine.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
58,748
Reputation
8,661
Daps
162,828
Round and round we go

The statements by "user" do not directly contradict one another. Here's a breakdown:

  1. Banning TikTok has nothing to do with any GDPR style policy.
    • This suggests that the user believes the TikTok ban is unrelated to data privacy policies like GDPR.
  2. Where did I argue against GDPR in America?
    • This implies that the user hasn't argued against GDPR in the context of America.
  3. Already, they are data privacy nightmares.
    • This indicates that the user believes some platforms (likely including TikTok) are problematic in terms of data privacy, but this does not necessarily tie into a specific stance on GDPR.
  4. My argument is irrespective of any social media platform or website. The government shouldn't be banning websites or apps that haven't engaged in criminal wrongdoing.
    • This suggests that the user is concerned with government overreach in banning platforms, regardless of their data privacy practices.

Conclusion:​

These statements seem consistent. The user appears to be drawing a distinction between their concerns about data privacy and their belief that governments should not ban platforms unless there is criminal wrongdoing. The statement about GDPR may simply be clarifying that their argument is not tied to specific policies like GDPR, even though they may acknowledge data privacy issues.

9VfkbWv.png

:sas2:
 
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
8,044
Reputation
981
Daps
24,959
Reppin
Philadelphia
now i'm not human? :gucci:
expound on the lies? :feedme:

i'm not a member of any social media site and i've said this repeatedly already, they are data privacy nightmares.

my argument is irrespective of any social media platform or website. the government shouldn't be banning websites or apps that hasn't engaged in criminal wrongdoing.

you gonna accuse everybody who doesn't agree with censorship of being addicted to a website? :what:

circular reasoning
Circular reasoning is a logical fallacy in which the premise of an argument assumes the conclusion to be true. For example, a person may argue that dogs are man’s best friend because they are the friendliest animals.






whataboutism, the rhetorical practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counteraccusation, by asking a different but related question, or by raising a different issue altogether. Whataboutism often serves to reduce the perceived plausibility or seriousness of the original accusation or question by suggesting that the person advancing it is hypocritical or that the responder’s misbehavior is not unique or unprecedented. Acts of whataboutism typically begin with rhetorical questions of the form “What about…?”



















Now please continue spamming links, using AI and your overall shyt posting campaign while I ignore your existence, human or not
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
58,748
Reputation
8,661
Daps
162,828
circular reasoning
Circular reasoning is a logical fallacy in which the premise of an argument assumes the conclusion to be true. For example, a person may argue that dogs are man’s best friend because they are the friendliest animals.


whataboutism, the rhetorical practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counteraccusation, by asking a different but related question, or by raising a different issue altogether. Whataboutism often serves to reduce the perceived plausibility or seriousness of the original accusation or question by suggesting that the person advancing it is hypocritical or that the responder’s misbehavior is not unique or unprecedented. Acts of whataboutism typically begin with rhetorical questions of the form “What about…?”


Now please continue spamming links, using AI and your overall shyt posting campaign while I ignore your existence, human or not


whats the difference between "spamming links" and citing a source ?

what is is about my use of AI that you object to?
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
58,748
Reputation
8,661
Daps
162,828
Original thought

i'm not a tiktok creator or user moving to another social media platform to share that experience. so what original thought could I have provided in that regard?

I argued against censorship using my own words and then i shared the opinions of others who cited a legal precedent against government similar government action being taken. i've said repeatedly, the government should not be censoring people.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
58,748
Reputation
8,661
Daps
162,828
you continue to overlook the crux of the argument in an attempt to muddy the waters.

:pachaha:

your argument is invalid, the government shouldn't be censoring websites or apps that haven't done anything criminal. it's unconstitutional. in that case the government wouldn't even be censoring them but taking them out of business and seizing their domains. tiktok will continue to operate, just outside of the united states and thats censorship plain and simple.

why do you want the government to censor what information americans can access online?
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,270
Reputation
7,002
Daps
147,145
Reppin
CookoutGang
your argument is invalid, the government shouldn't be censoring websites or apps that haven't done anything criminal
The fundamental flaw with your argument is the government is who determines legality and this same government has decided on the ban. Via the legislature, up to the presidents desk, and now through the Supreme Court.

:skip:

You sure you aren’t a chatbot?
 
Top