These pro tiktok arguments coming from the same people who attack the government for not providing support for previous Spyware it knew about is ironically more proof of the dangers the platform presents.
Are we sure @bnew isn't a bot
Is it true or not?
You made abroad claim that the government should not protect its citizens from harmful websites.
I said s yes they should and gave a a real example of harm.
For someone who claims to not be carrying water, you surely are.
Cross posting multiple of the same long posts in multiple threads at the same time is going to get you nap allegations.
Does the website not bare responsibility for how it is being used? It does.the harm wasn't from the website but the bad actors who used the website to facilitate their scam like every social media site that has ever existed has been used to facilitate scams.
Did backpage?has tiktok itself scammed users?
Cross posting multiple of the same long posts in multiple threads at the same time is going to get you nap allegations.
At least you’re a bot and not a the old version of Indians in a makeshift office
Does the website not bare responsibility for how it is being used? It does.
The lack of transparency in that regard is why it was banned, particularly knowing it’s controlled by a hostile foreign government.
One day you’re arguing for GDPR in America and the next day you’re arguing against it.
Did backpage?
Cap and your nonsense arguments also do not help your non bot causei sometimes cross-post to relevant threads because people aren't following the same threads so you get different perspectives. theres people on this forum that avoid this sub-forum for some reason but discuss similar topics.
Cap and your nonsense arguments also do not help your non bot cause
free speech/free association > everything elsewhich argument was non-sense?
Seems you have missed the entirety of the argument for TikTok.section 230 covers all social media platforms. by your own logic, all social media should have been banned since they've all been used to facilitate crimes and will continue to do so.
where did i argue against GDPR in america?
Do you even understand concepts such as data at rest?banning tiktok has nothing to do with any GDPR style policy. they want an american to own it, they don't want to change the any data collecting policies once that happens. people are now making arguments the U.S congress hasn't even made.
Transparency is a term you’ve seen me use multiple times.The GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) aims to protect the personal data of individuals within the European Union, giving them more control over how their information is collected, used, and stored by ensuring organizations handle personal data responsibly and securely; essentially safeguarding individuals' privacy rights regarding their personal data.
Key points about GDPR protection:
- Individual rights:
Provides individuals with the right to access their personal data, request correction, and even be "forgotten" by companies in certain situations.- Data minimization:
Requires organizations to only collect the necessary personal data for a specific purpose.- Transparency:
Companies must be transparent about how they collect and use personal data.- Consent:
Requires explicit consent from individuals before processing their personal data.
free speech/free association > everything else
Would not be coming from the same person who is spamming this websites with links to apps that the CCP has control and access to. The same CCP that has kidnapped people and thrown them into "re education camps".
Seems you have missed the entirety of the argument for TikTok.
In particular EUIi,PII, and its associated meta data being under the control of a foreign government with no way to ensure its compliance.
Just say you’re addicted to TikTok. It would save us from attempting to relitigate arguments that have already been litigated up to scotus.