WHY IS ARAB COLONIZATION GIVEN A PASS?

Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
362
Reputation
422
Daps
1,446
Reppin
Botz
Nah, its the Arabs and muslims:







:manny:

OMG, this one saw me posting the history of Darfur and in response just repeated the exact nonsense I described while also dismissing the history of the conflict, like I mentioned that commonly happens.

"Darfur was an independent sultanate from about 1600 until 1916, when it was merged with neighbouring Sudan as it became the last big territory to be absorbed into the British empire. In an earlier era Darfur had been one of Egypt's main trading partners—its sultan exchanged letters with Napoleon in 1798. Under the British, Darfur was a backwater ruled by a few colonial officers, who delegated most of their powers to tribal chiefs. After Sudan's independence in 1956, Darfur was again neglected, with little economic development, few roads and the poorest education and health services in all of Sudan."

"The political marginalization of the Darfur region since the creation of colonial Sudan has resulted in one of the continent's longest-standing conflicts, which threatens to destroy the country's social fabric and its historical heritage."
This guy is a historian that focuses on STUDYING(NOT LOOKING AT SCREENSHOTS) of different African states that existed pre-20th century.

"Darfur was an independent sultanate before it was incorporated into British-controlled Sudan in 1916. Sudan gained independence from the British Empire in 1956."

"Darfur was unique in a Sudanese colonial context in that in 1916 the British conquered a functioning multi-ethnic African Muslim state."

"A rebellion led by ʿAli Dīnār in 1915 provoked the British to launch a punitive expedition, in which he was killed (November 1916). Thereafter Darfur became a province (and later three provinces) of the Sudan."

"The Sultanate of Darfur remained independent until World War I. However, as a consequence of Ali Dinar's links with the Ottoman Empire during the war, the British invaded and annexed Darfur into the Anglo-Egyptian domain in 1916."

Map of Sudan from 16th and 19th centuries, showing the kingdom of Darfur.


It's like some of you are allergic to knowing more than superficial knowledge. Making it super easy to be manipulated.
 
Last edited:

mbewane

Knicks: 93 til infinity
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
18,524
Reputation
3,881
Daps
52,457
Reppin
Brussels, Belgium
Geez I wonder, why is it that on an american forum with people mostly living in the West do we talk more about the form of slavery that had an enormous impact in the West and literally built the US? :jbhmm:

Westerners acting like they care about arab slavery is hilarious. Euro colonizers already used that angle in the 19th century talmbout how they were in Africa to "free Africans" :dead:
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
14,544
Reputation
3,877
Daps
58,213
The Muslims fukked over a lot of people.

They used Eastern European women as concubines more than anyone along with African women. They usually turned African men into soldiers or eunuchs to guard the harems.

Black Americans - our oppressors were mostly English (sometimes Scottish/Irish/Welsh).....so we know the Arabs were on fuccboi time but our trauma doesn't come from them.
 

mbewane

Knicks: 93 til infinity
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
18,524
Reputation
3,881
Daps
52,457
Reppin
Brussels, Belgium
The Muslims fukked over a lot of people.

They used Eastern European women as concubines more than anyone along with African women. They usually turned African men into soldiers or eunuchs to guard the harems.

Black Americans - our oppressors were mostly English (sometimes Scottish/Irish/Welsh).....so we know the Arabs were on fuccboi time but our trauma doesn't come from them.

Also White-Christian slavery is literally what built the entire Americas and capitalism.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
55,882
Reputation
-19,811
Daps
74,900
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Saudi Arabia did not exist on this planet until 1902-1932.


LOL


The world's second-largest religion,[4] Islam, emerged in what is now Saudi Arabia. In the early 7th century, the Islamic prophet Muhammad united the population of Arabiaand created a single Islamic religious polity.[5]Following his death in 632, his followers rapidly expanded the territory under Muslim rule beyond Arabia, conquering huge and unprecedented swathes of territory (from the Iberian Peninsula in the west to modern-day Pakistan in the east) in a matter of decades. Arab dynasties originating from modern-day Saudi Arabia founded the Rashidun (632–661), Umayyad (661–750), Abbasid (750–1517), and Fatimid (909–1171) caliphates, as well as numerous other dynasties in Asia, Africa, and Europe.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
55,882
Reputation
-19,811
Daps
74,900
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Also Palestine doesn't belong to either the jews or Arabs historically. They're both invaders there. Imagine a group of pale skins claiming to originate from damn near Africa :mjlol:

MIZRAHI JEWS ARE NOT “PALE SKINS”

ISRAEL WEATHER IS CLOSER TO CALIFORNIA WEATHER.. NOT AFRICA. THATS WHY THE PIGMENT OF THE INHABITANTS WOULD BE CLOSER TO NATIVE AMERICANS THAN TO AFRICANS.. WHICH DESCRIBES MIZRAHI JEWS.

BUT REGARDLESS, JEWS HAD SOVEREIGNTY OVER THE LAND IN ANCIENT TIMES…. ARABS NEVER DID.
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
102,366
Reputation
13,269
Daps
241,501
Because people dont know shyt about it and we don't live in the Muslim world

Also the Muslim world nit under control of the white man were some of the last nations to end formal slavery in their nation's. Like imagine slavery just ended in the 1960s
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
55,882
Reputation
-19,811
Daps
74,900
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Because people dont know shyt about it and we don't live in the Muslim world

Also the Muslim world nit under control of the white man were some of the last nations to end formal slavery in their nation's. Like imagine slavery just ended in the 1960s


IN SOME REGIONS ITS STILL GOING ON
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
102,366
Reputation
13,269
Daps
241,501
IN SOME REGIONS ITS STILL GOING ON
I believe it. It shows in how they interact. When you're used to treating people as objects or less then there's an attitude there that takes generations to shake off.

Just like the American white man. We been trying to grind him down to civility for centuries now
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
55,882
Reputation
-19,811
Daps
74,900
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
I believe it. It shows in how they interact. When you're used to treating people as objects or less then there's an attitude there that takes generations to shake off.

Just like the American white man. We been trying to grind him down to civility for centuries now


 

3rdWorld

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
41,838
Reputation
3,205
Daps
122,688
MIZRAHI JEWS ARE NOT “PALE SKINS”

ISRAEL WEATHER IS CLOSER TO CALIFORNIA WEATHER.. NOT AFRICA. THATS WHY THE PIGMENT OF THE INHABITANTS WOULD BE CLOSER TO NATIVE AMERICANS THAN TO AFRICANS.. WHICH DESCRIBES MIZRAHI JEWS.

BUT REGARDLESS, JEWS HAD SOVEREIGNTY OVER THE LAND IN ANCIENT TIMES…. ARABS NEVER DID.

The Jews that occupied that land prior to pale skins like Netanyahu were Black Africans..their remnants are still found there and in Ethiopia.
These are the people Akhenaten was dealing with, they were Black as coal Africans.

Those pale skins are just edomite turks from the periphery of turkey who moved into the area and adopted the faith then eventually did what white jews do and took it all for themselves. They're white Europeans and white Europeans along with Arabs are not indigenous to Africa.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
55,882
Reputation
-19,811
Daps
74,900
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
The Jews that occupied that land prior to pale skins like Netanyahu were Black Africans..their remnants are still found there and in Ethiopia.
These are the people Akhenaten was dealing with, they were Black as coal Africans.

Those pale skins are just edomite turks from the periphery of turkey who moved into the area and adopted the faith then eventually did what white jews do and took it all for themselves. They're white Europeans and white Europeans along with Arabs are not indigenous to Africa.


:mjlol:


THE JEWS OF JUDEA WERE NOT BLACK FOO


IM SURE THERE WERE BLACK JEWS, BECAUSE JUDAISM WAS NEVER DEFINED BY SKIN COLOR


BUT THE MAJORITY OF JEWS IN THE LEVANT WERE MIDDLE EASTERN…NOT WHITE OR BLACK, BUT A SHADE IN BETWEEN.

THE ASHKENAZI JEWS U SPEAK OF ARE THE MINORITY IN ISRAEL.. AND EVEN THO THEY BLENDED IN WIT THE WHITE FOLKS AFTER GOING INTO EXILE IN EUROPE (THOUSANDS OF YEARS OF INTERMIXING AND ADAPTATION WILL DO THAT) EVEN THEY HAVE BEEN PROVEN TO TRACE THEIR ANCESTRY TO ANCIENT JEWS VIA DNA.

@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited U DAPPIN THIS NONSENSE? LOL
 
Top