I don't think they're just showing up independently like that. Let's be honest a lot are going W/ someone. Also, I'm not just speaking on this film. I'm speaking on all the films as of late that have mainly female leads. Plus these female heroes aren't even A tier. They're more B and C tier. THIS may do good, but that's because it's a part of Spider ManThose same women that didn’t grow up reading comics or watching superhero cartoons on the regular show up to other superhero movies. Why would this movie be different? The bold is totally correct. You can watch superhero movies without reading comics.
A superhero movie today is nothing more than an action flick to most people. They’re mainstream. Why we treating superhero movies like they’re still on the fringes of pop culture. We aren’t talking about anime.
That doesn’t answer anything. What are the real numbers? You can lie with statistics.Men still make up the majority of viewers for female superhero movies.
The Marvels - which bombed - had 61% men for the audience compared to 39% of women opening weekend.
'The Marvels' Box Office Bust Highlights the MCU's Biggest Challenge | Analysis
If the Marvel Cinematic Universe is no longer special, there may be less interest in "X-Men," "Fantastic Four" and “Blade”www.thewrap.com
So this isn't a men issue. It's an issue with how society as a whole doesn't seem interested in watching female superheroes as much
one of these characters is not like the others. and hopefully they dont go so far up storms ass like they have recentlyStudio needs to stop playing and put X-Men out, so Storm, Rogue, Psylocke, Jean, and the White Queen can crush the buildings.
There's a lot of women haters out there, but this is a stupid idea for a film.
This is what happens when Sony buy the rights to all the Spider-Man related characters. Morbius, Venom, Madame Web and Kraven.
All mid to shyt tier films.
This is the real issue, Sony makes trash marvel movies but where’s the fun in that? Guys can’t punch down on thatI would still watch a female lead superhero movie. What I won’t watch is a SONY produced superhero movie, they’re autotrash.
Now it seems like you’re making my point, it has nothing to do with the cast of women. It’s a shyt movie and we recognize going in it’ll probably be shyt. My point is it’s odd how men will ignore that and talk about the women in the movie.I don't think they're just showing up independently like that. Let's be honest a lot are going W/ someone. Also, I'm not just speaking on this film. I'm speaking on all the films as of late that have mainly female leads. Plus these female heroes aren't even A tier. They're more B and C tier. THIS may do good, but that's because it's a part of Spider Man
So, question.
Sony has all the rights to Jessica Drew’s Spider-Woman, Ghost-Spider/GwenPool/Gwen Stacey, Cindy Moon/Silk, and Felicia Hardy/Black Cat… right???
My question is if they have all those properties, wouldn’t it make sense to have Sydney star in one of the above (mainly either one of the Gwens or Black Cat) instead of this bullshyt???
I feel you, but for the bolded I can't say their totally invalid for that. It's blatant panderingNow it seems like you’re making my point, it has nothing to do with the cast of women. It’s a shyt movie and we recognize going in it’ll probably be shyt. My point is it’s odd how men will ignore that and talk about the women in the movie.
Marvel in the late 90s was hurting as bad as a company could hurt and they were desperate for a come upMan I know Marvel was hurting but they really sold off the rights to one of they most famous IPs