While the movie had flaws, I hate these types of videos
These guys get so smug by pointing out every flaw in logic in movies.
I'm pretty sure you could find these leaps in logic in virtually any movie ever created if you wanna break it down by every scene and question each word said, each motivation, and the realism of each scenario.
This guy is annoying in this video.
Like really it's too sunny and not windy enough for a tornado ?
You really want logical scientific explanations for every piece of technology used?
You gonna break down every situation where the physics are wrong?
Why are they throwing each other in fights?
Why does the enemy have metal pins for claws?
Why did they run into each other at the right place and the right time? (it's a movie that's why)
Why does Superman's dad say it's nice to see him grown if he's dead? Uhh because it's a comic book movie about highly advanced civiizlations and technology, you want them to break down how this is possible? Really?
We get it... there's holes in the plot, and issues in logic, but somehow it was still entertaining
It's an hour and a half movie and he is mad about every 'convenient' situation that occurs. As if they don't in other movies, or the comics for that matter.
Listen I get it, the plot could have been stronger, the situations could've been more carefully thought out and worked through to be more realistic, but c'mon it's a Superman movie. How serious does it have to take itself exactly?
I guarantee you could do this with movies the same guy considers classic too. Or any movie for that matter.
Out of that 8 minute video it was mostly nitpicking crap.
I'd like to see this guys scripts he wrote, I'm sure they are flawless.
nikkas lame as fukk. Geek ass nikkas.
I completely see why you like the movie.You sound like a faq
Yes sir. But hold up: You're the one who came in swinging - callin people "geek ass nikkas". You're the one with the "Clark Kent" handle. You're the one who called a couple of sentences a "thesis". Like I said: I get why you like the movie now. Lets just dead this side convo. It ain't going anywhere, and I don't care that much.You in here writing a thesis complaining about a fukking comic book movie about the most boring character ever created and you're an adult right?
You not a geek ass nikka for liking a comic book character, you a geek ass nikka if you're scrutinizing a fukking cartoon comic book action film like its Escape from Sobibor. I personally don't like Superman or his movies. My s/n is a pun on something I said on sohh a long time ago, you can disregard that in terms of the conversation. I repeat, you couldn't find a post of mine praising anything superman related. My point is its an action film, unless you don't like the action in it, it isnt all that serious.I completely see why you like the movie.
Yes sir. But hold up: You're the one who came in swinging - callin people "geek ass nikkas". You're the one with the "Clark Kent" handle. You're the one who called a couple of sentences a "thesis". Like I said: I get why you like the movie now. Lets just dead this side convo. It ain't going anywhere, and I don't care that much.
Gotta agree..it was better than Superman Returns, but that's not saying much. I fukk with Zack Snyder, but he failed here; hopefully he can come backBad characterization, ugly cinematography,misguided tone, horrid pacing of 3/4 being action 1/4 being story. to miss the mark to that extent with superman of all things given the era we are in and the source material provided is unacceptable
Did you also prefer the rugged bearded look?supes looked like a greaseball italian with that hair