Then there must've been a lot of anomalies taking places because Rondo has repeatedly shown that he can score in regular season games and in playoffs.
Not necessarily. Best PGs in 2007-08:
Jason Kidd, probably. He and Rondo share the similar playing styles, if not identical.
Tony Parker, possibly.
Chauncey Billups, possibly.
Steve Nash, no. He would've been too much of a defensive liability. Mike Bibby, Chauncey Billups, and even Derek Fisher would've had career playoff games against him.
Chris Paul, no. With David West (20ppg/9rpg/1bpg; all-star), Tyson Chandler (12ppg/12ppg/1bpg), Peja Stojakovic (16ppg/4rpg, 44% from 3) and Birdman (defensive specialist), he couldn't get past the 2nd round. Plus, he would take too many touches (dribble-dribble) away from the Big 3 and would've disrupted the chemistry of the Big 3.
Baron Davis, nope.
Deron Williams, nope.
Outside of Kidd, Parker, and (maybe) Billups, I'd say you're wrong. You have to realize that Rondo's main priority during that run was to be a playmaker and play defense. Rondo was the PERFECT fit for that team. People severely underrate the difficulty of Rondo's job to run point for that team.
Rondo is elite, when healthy. His lack of scoring doesn't diminish that fact. He's one of the best--if not the best--playmakers in the game. His defense has been recognized as one of the best at the PG position. He's a walking triple-double threat. And he's led his team deep in the playoffs multiple times.
CP3 is a better scorer no doubt. And he's having a better season than Rondo for sure. But I don't think it's a foregone conclusion that CP3 would've won the championship with the 08 Celtics. How about he make it past the 2nd round of the playoffs first? How about he lead Blake, De'Andre, JJ Reddikk, Jamal Crawford to the finals before we praise him like he's a basketball gawd?
Nash - Easily. Nash doesn't meed to be a great defender with KG behind him and his offensive versatilty means that Pierce, Allen, and KG can eat
CP3 played in the West so shut that shyt all the way up. What you're saying is as stupid as saying George Hill is a better PG because he played in a weaker East and got to the playoffs as the 4th option on his team. CP3 is also ten times the off ball player that Rondo is so he could play off the ball much easier if Pierce or them are cooking. Rondo is useless without the ball in his hand.
Put Rondo on the Clippers and they'd be worse than with CP3.
LMAO at Rondo being a better playmaker than CP3. Rondo is one of the best passers in the league but thats not the same thing as playmaking.
CP3 makes offenses better, Rondo doesn't. Rondo is a better passer than Lebron but he's not a better playmaker because Lebron's presence alone does more for creating opportunities and looks for his teammates.
Like I said, Rondo is good. He's not a player you build around. He played his role well for the Celtics but that's ALL HE DID. Rondo is making the Mavs worse because he's such a non threat when scoring that you can pretty much forget about him. No team is worried about Rondo beating them with his scoring so if he starts knocking down threes, it's a "oh well". It's like if you shut down Lebron and Wade on the Heat but Chalmers sropped 30 on your head. You live with that.
Rondo's triple double potebtial comes with the caveat that you're dealing with one of the worst scorers among perimeter players, a PG who shoots free throws worse than DeAndre Jordan, and the like. A couple of extra reboubds a game isn't worth 9 PPG on godawful shooting. Why don't you ever post his efficient numbers?
10/10/10 isn't an impressive game when you shooting 34%.
I'd much rather have a 27/7/3 game whole shooting 50%.