What I want to know from people like Cornell and in this thread is...
Do y'all want something rhetorical or something tangible from Obama?
Because he can go out there and do the rhetorical stuff no problem: giving speeches/interviews about black issues, play "bully pulpit", pound desks, visit all the hoods etc etc. Is that what folks want???
Because basic civics 101 shows that getting anything tangible mostly lies with CONGRESS and not the presidency. And its guaranteed that any massive changes will get watered down once it gets through the meat grind of that place...so why not take the incremental gains and keep moving and fighting, instead of bytching and complaining.
Why can't intelligent people like Cornell West understand that simple fact about American Civics?
Do y'all want something rhetorical or something tangible from Obama?
Because he can go out there and do the rhetorical stuff no problem: giving speeches/interviews about black issues, play "bully pulpit", pound desks, visit all the hoods etc etc. Is that what folks want???
Because basic civics 101 shows that getting anything tangible mostly lies with CONGRESS and not the presidency. And its guaranteed that any massive changes will get watered down once it gets through the meat grind of that place...so why not take the incremental gains and keep moving and fighting, instead of bytching and complaining.
Why can't intelligent people like Cornell West understand that simple fact about American Civics?