and THAT RIGHT THERE bolded is fukkin stupid...EVERYTHING IN HISTORY has been made into a fictional story here n there...what the fukk makes our history so fukkin untouchable???...this nikka did the SAME thing with the Nazi's and holocaust with Inglourious Basterds....and I was ridin for Spike for YEARS until he just solidified himself as a whiny bytch after so many fukkin years of complaining about fukking EVERYTHING...a fukkin slavery themed western is REAL HISTORY nikka...as in that's the type of shyt that was going on in the times of cowboys n shyt like that....most movies just don't wanna SHOW U that part...they don't wanna show u that some of the FIRST COWBOYS was black...they don't wanna show u that shyt..THIS is why I said to read a fukkin book before all this fukkin fake outrage hits because it's makin muthafukkas look ignorant to their OWN HISTORY...When I made that statement about reading books I was referring to wanting to hear about black slaves killing whites..because clearly those type of movies will never make it into production..I don't really know what your point was
How does being offended by a slavery themed western make black people look ignorant..........
What is it that you don't understand??? Something as serious as slavery doesn't need to be shot as some fictional story...POINT FUCCIN BLANK
You seem to have a problem with Spike...Spike has earned the right to have his opinion and HAS DONE WAY MORE FOR THE BLACK COMMUNITY THAN CAC QT ....
Your not getting that Spike doesn't want to see the movie because he doesn't like the whole premise of the movie..and I agree with him
and Once again if your not BLACK...you cannot speak on Spike lee and his issue with the movie about slavery...You are not black...You do not care about out ancestors..so SHUT THE FUCC UP......
Go debate the holocaust ..or some other shyt..but your opinion on Slavery and Spike are useless
of course they did but it shouldn't be put together the way QT put it together..........
Didn’t they notice that Tarantino throws in an “S.N.L.”-type skit about the Ku Klux Klan, who gather on their horses for a raid only to complain petulantly that they can’t see well out of their slitted white hoods? Or that Samuel L. Jackson does a roaring, bug-eyed parody of an Uncle Tom house slave in the second half? Or that the heroine of the movie, a female slave, is called Broomhilda von Shaft?
a SNL skit about the Ku Klux Klan....in a movie about slavery??? Broomhilda von Shaft?? I'd slap QT personally...The fucc is this a comedy?? No homie..my post made perfect sense
I'm not talking about comedic moments in a movie; pretty much all movies have that. I'm talking about the overall tone of films. Django Unchained was not a serious movie.
You think somebody's going to allow for a Holocaust western to come out next year? No. And you wouldn't defend that shyt either. But if it has to do with Black people, there will of course be people like you on it like white on rice ready to defend.
and im black...and always been pro black..and I know my black history..and preach that shyt as much as I can.....so fukk all this talk right here as well...nikkas who think like this aint the solution to the problem or the bigger picture in this shyt...
This post would make sense if the movie actualy downplayed slavery. It didn't it showed it in all it's ugliness.
And do you think slaves didn't find things to laugh about? Do you think an accurate depictions of their lives would be all somber doom and gloom. They laughed they played they danced and they loved, why should a movie not touch on this aspect of their lives?
yea..the nikka was WRONG for making those white ignorant people look stupid as fukk as they were right?.....and the thing is..that shyt was real...those dumbasses DID have problems seeing out of those hoods...how the fukk did that belittle black people or slavery in any way????...tell me that...
of course they did but it shouldn't be put together they way QT put it together..........
Didnt they notice that Tarantino throws in an S.N.L.-type skit about the Ku Klux Klan, who gather on their horses for a raid only to complain petulantly that they cant see well out of their slitted white hoods? Or that Samuel L. Jackson does a roaring, bug-eyed parody of an Uncle Tom house slave in the second half? Or that the heroine of the movie, a female slave, is called Broomhilda von Shaft?
a SNL skit about the Ku Klux Klan....in a movie about slavery??? Broomhilda von Shaft?? I'd slap QT personally...The fucc is this a comedy?? No homie..my post made perfect sense
How was it accurate? No slaves were killed by the hands of a white man in the movie. Another slave killed one, another was killed by dogs. Where were the scenes of hard labor from sun up to sundown. Do you know what picking cotton, tabacco, sugar cane, etc does to your hands and back? What do you think they did to these slaves when they couldn't labor anymore. There were no rape scenes not just to women but young girls and possibly young boys as sick as these Cacs are. Cause that shyt happened. Where is the scene with a kid being sold to another owner after being around family for years? It is deeper than what was in the movie. The fact that some of you think the movie is an accurate portrayal of slavery is absolutely despicable
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
why would black people need to READ A BOOK ON THEIR OWN HISTORY?...oh I don't know...maybe so they can KNOW WTF they talkin bout before arguing about shyt?...don't EVER question my blackness my nikka...u need to fukk outta here wit that shyt..If your black in your previous post you sure didn't seem like it
Originally Posted by spliz
son I understand what u sayin...and I agree...but is that THE MOVIE's fault..is that QUENTIN's fault that shyt is that way?...nah fam..that shyt is the GOV'T...the INDUSTRY..and SOCIETY's fault...but shyt...black people need to READ A fukkING BOOK before all this fake outrage hit's as well...talkin bout they offended about a black slavery themed western...it just makes them look IGNORANT to THEIR OWN history...that nikka spike has literally had a problem with EVERY SLAVE THEMED movie EVER made whether it was black directed or not...shyt..I would respected if the nikka actually SAW the movie...broke down what he didnt like about it..etc...no..he didnt do that..he made an assessment on a movie before he even seen it...and the more fukked up part is both Tarentino and Jamie...said that Spike KNEW about the film..Tarantino said he read the script...and Jamie said that SPIKE HIMSELF said he would make a rant about the movie when it came out...now he's the fukkin main subject when this movie comes up cause this nikka loves the attention...he shyts on black directors as well...anytime someone does somethin he doesn't like..but does this nikka give pointers?..no..does he even MAKE shyt to show these muhfukkas how it's done?...NO...the nikka hasn't made a quality project in YEARS yet he always talkin bout somebody else shyt...instead of having a TRUE discussion about this movie and slavery in general...everything is goin back to fukkin SPIKE...which is prolly what he wanted anyway...
Why would you say BLACK PPL need to read a book like that....why would you generalize that to black people?? your use of they "talking about THEY offended"
If your black your black...but the way you was typing
alot of these fukkin fakkits dont realize that EVERY SINGLE MOVIE has to get greenlight by the government
they will never put NAT TURNER on a screen
its a reason why they let QUENTIN TARANTINO director a movie on SLAVERY
Dude, QT's last movie (Inglorious Basterds) is basically the same exact formula as Django except its set in the Holocaust. Same amount of comedy, same style, not as much a western, but definitely had comedic overtones. You bugging.