a lot of you paranoid, inferiority complex having nikkas is exposing yourself in this thread
right?
people should have been happy. jews had inglorious b*stards, where they got to finally kill some nazis in the movies, all my jewish friends were likequoting the movie, calling themselves the characters. now we get some shine and nikkas are mad?
when I first saw the previews n youtube, I read the comments and cacs were talkin about "great, the white man is the villian getting killed again", I was like damn right, history is history. I come here and nikkas are talking about "why did it have to be in the slavery days" there are not too many white men that will make themselves and their people the villian and have their own people getting shot up and killed by brown folks. usually they sugar coat that stuff and sweep it under the rug or have another white saving the poor brown folks.
QT JUST GAVE YOU A MOVIE WHERE YOU GET REVENGE AND A CHANCE TO AVENGE THE BLACK QUEEN AND YOU'RE COMPLAINING???????????????
You sad stupid fukks. In inglorious basterds, the Jews turned Hitler to swish cheese and a female Jew burned most of the 3rd Reich. The Jewish ended WW2 and the holocaust in one fell etherous swoop.
no it's not. it's set during World War II. Like I said before, this comparison would make more sense if Django was a movie about black soldiers in the Civil War killing confederates (ie. Glory) or if IB was actually set inside a Concentration Camp but it's not.
now, if QT made a movie about an escaped prisoner fukking up Concentration Camp SS commanders while freeing the rest of the prisoners, all done in the quirky, semi-serious style that he's known for, I more than likely wouldn't be that offended by it. At the same time, I would understand if a Jewish person took offense to this and wouldn't be outright MAD at that person for being offended like some people seem to be with Spike Lee. I felt the same way about Passion of the Christ and Life is Beautiful. I liked both movies and wasn't personally offended by them, but I understood why some Jewish people found them offensive
Keep in mind, I'm a black person saying this. I can't imagine a Jewish person shytting on another Jewish person for taking offense to that premise even if he enjoyed the movie. so that's why I'mat all the black folks who are going so hard on Spike over his Django comments
nikka the holocaust and world war II was going on at the same damn time.
.....because I still don't understand why " they" got to read a book ...shyt is not fake outrage
Saying the movie is accurate isn't the same as saying it showed all the atrocities of slavery. I'm saying what the movie did show was fairly accurate and not watered down at all.
How was it accurate? No slaves were killed by the hands of a white man in the movie. Another slave killed one, another was killed by dogs. Where were the scenes of hard labor from sun up to sundown. Do you know what picking cotton, tabacco, sugar cane, etc does to your hands and back? What do you think they did to these slaves when they couldn't labor anymore. There were no rape scenes not just to women but young girls and possibly young boys as sick as these Cacs are. Cause that shyt happened. Where is the scene with a kid being sold to another owner after being around family for years? It is deeper than what was in the movie. The fact that some of you think the movie is an accurate portrayal of slavery is absolutely despicable
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Dude stop blaming this mysterious "they," it has nothing to do with "they" and everything to do with the fact that WE ain't got enough of OUR OWN shyt to do the kind of films WE wanna do, so therefore WE won't be seeing films made out of the things WE want. "They" aren't doing anything except what "they" wanna do, because "they" can.
nikka I'll question whatever the fucc I like....If you ain't moving for the betterment of my people I don't give a fucc what color you are......
you insist black ppl don't know what WE are talking about..it is our history....if they don't know what their talking about its because of the WHITE WASHING of our history..............
and IDK the way you kept saying they...got me like
Slavery was nothing to laugh at
In Django, Django killed a bunch of ignorant hicks, a white woman and a c00n. Dude didnt even get the chance to kill the man who owned his wife... Blacks were still enslaved and the KKK was still on the come up. Blacks aint get their revenge
a lot of you paranoid, inferiority complex having nikkas is exposing yourself in this thread
He was more focused on killing Jackson than any other cac in the film, going so far as to travel back to the plantation just to style on him. The only times Django showed stones was when he was shytting on black folks.
You're damn straight it apples and oranges. In ID, a few Jews got their revenge the people who were the direct cause to their people's suffering. Blacks were afforded that opportunity in Django. Django himself wasnt even remotely concerned with the blight of Blacks. There doesn't need to be a Hitler equivalent in Django to label it a Black revenge as you would ID a Jew revenge film. Django doesn't even get to kill a Plantation owner
I never expected to Taranino to be accurate at all, the man never finished high school but his stans consistently use "accurately" as one of his defenses. QT sold this as a Black revenge flick before he started filming, I was excited to see it until I did. Django is as much as a Black revenge film as XXX: State of the Union is. Cube and Foxx kill just as many cacs.:rational:
