I think the theory is this: Not until the 80s-90s did Brooklyn get its current reputation. Oddly enough, that's when the non ados arrived and the violence became...
superlative.
As background, there's been a black community in bk since the 1600s when the Dutch ran the city. A lot of ados from the south ended up here after moving out of Harlem. During those times, the violence was just 'regular'. Ofc, when the more violent ppl showed up, ados would have naturally adjusted so as not to be food.
Im asking though, bc i just moved here right before the corona and didn't get a chance to learn the hoods. (The reason i don't already know them is bc
i wasnt even allowed out here growing up.)
@ bold, does that not prove the theory?
Okay here's where I get really deep into this and
trigger warning for you and everyone. I took Harlem Renaissance as one of my courses in school. As a requirement, we had to read up on Literature and Artist from their time in Harlem. James Weldon Johnson, Zora Neale Hurston, Langston Hughes etc. in almost all of their writings they described the West Indian community that migrated there as hard-working and opening businesses. Not to say there wasn't a crime on their part, but that was the nature of Harlem at the time due to the economic inequality in the community.
"Thus the West Indian immigrant was constantly trying to improve his economic position. He was also unlikely to accept racial slurs without protest, for the West Indian believed a man should be judged more by his talents than his color. Out of this heightened class consciousness came a small group of political and economic radicals. Many of Harlem’s street corner orators in the 1920’s were West Indian immigrants. Among the most prominent was a Virgin Islander named Hubert H. Harrison. He was a Socialist, an expert on African history, a militant critic of American society, and a staunch defender of the Negro’s racial heritage. Harrison conducted formal lectures in what he called the Harlem School of Social Sciences. He also conducted lectures on street corners, which he referred to as his “outdoor university.”
Other West Indian radicals presented talks on “Socialism vs. Capitalism”’ organized tenants’ leagues, published Marxist journals, and tried to make the Harlem Negro labor-conscious. Richard B. Moore, Frank R. Crosswaith, and Reverend Ethred Brown (all West Indian) were prominent local candidates for the Board of Aldermen, Assembly, and Congress, running on Socialist and Communist tickets. They failed, however, to obtain a significant percentage of the vote.
While just a small portion of the West Indian population were political and economic activists, the majority of West Indians were trying to better their own economic positions. Menial labor was considered a sign of racial degradation and was looked upon with disgust. Most Negro immigrants accepted menial jobs but were motivated by their traditions and beliefs to improve their lot in life. As a group, the West Indians became noted for their ambition, thrift, and business acumen. Some of the American Negroes resented the economic success that West Indians achieved"-
78.02.08: The Social Contributions of The Harlem Renaissance
So when the West Indians migrated to Harlem and then after Brooklyn, they carried the same mindset. Bumpy Johnson, Nicky Barnes and Willie Bosket are All Ados and from Harlem least, we forget. Fast forward to the 80's Brooklyn, and this is a
trigger warning. In the book "The Ville by Greg Donaldson, he surveys Brownsville and East NY for 7 years during the early 90's and focused on Thomas Jefferson High School. Now by his and the real characters' admission, he asked the ADOS student's why they won't take a "menial job like the Guyanese and Jamaican etc immigrants in the school like working as a cashier or janitor to earn money." The ADOS protagonist (Sharron Corley) stated "those jobs were for "chumps". He was a booster and stick up kid.
Again, not to say that their weren't West Indian descendant children doing crime in Brownsville and ENY too. To your point that you
weren't allowed here, I started working in Harlem about 3 years ago and I took my family to one of ya'll famous soul food spots to celebrate my godson's birthday. Would you believe my family was apprehensive because "Harlem was dangerous, and there was Yankee trouble" . They mostly stick to Brooklyn and the City, some never went to Harlem before. I'm hearing this in disbelief as I think about how my co-workers for 3 years made jokes about how bad Brooklyn is.
My point is that there is no culture of West Indians that made Brooklyn this way, you have to remember places like Brownsville and like 15 projects within walking distance beefing. You mentioned you weren't allowed here until you come here and or lived here to see the disparity of Brooklyn then there is no way to really describe it. (Everybody hates Chris takes a kind of PG approach, but once again) growing up and not seeing white people except some Hasidic jew or Jewish teachers, underfunded schools, no program for kids, overpopulation, no jobs, inadequate pay, close living quarters. It's not a West Indian thing which is why people like Tariq Nasheed piss me off with that jumping girl situation in my hood, you put the lowest paid people in one are, one skin color they gonna wild out regardless.