breh college stats mean nothing, teams draft base on potential
dee brown and luthor head were better than deron williams at illinois
and westbrook?
glue guys in college dont average 13 points a game and 5 assists playing off guard
Victor Oladipo the NBA's #1 pick
- Thread starter #1 pick
- Start date
breh college stats mean nothing, teams draft base on potential
dee brown and luthor head were better than deron williams at illinois
and westbrook?
glue guys in college dont average 13 points a game and 5 assists playing off guard
Harden doesn't do the little things to win games. That's a big part of the reason OKC stuck with
over Harden. Harden is a better offensive player than Russell but Russell is a better defender and does the little things that don't show up on stat sheets. Russell is the heart of OKC. Harden was a luxury. True be told, I never thought Harden was a championship player. I always seen him as Mitch Richmond 2.0. Love teams doesn't win because they just weren't that good of a team. One dimensional as heck but this year they should be much better and a playoff team but injuries killed that idea. With that said, Love also doesn't do the little things and is too damn selfish. He reminds me a little bit of Chuck but obviously more skilled and less athletic. They of course have a different skill-set but their impact on the game isn't that much different. You put Love on a very good team and watch him do work but I still don't think he's a superstar.
breh college stats mean nothing, teams draft base on potential
dee brown and luthor head were better than deron williams at illinois
and westbrook?
glue guys in college dont average 13 points a game and 5 assists playing off guard
Breh, you always
. I thought you would have caught a hint when I ignore you the first time for being stupid but nope. You like the attention.1. College stats matter or else you would have Anthony Randolph and Marvin Williams going over CP3 and Deron in every draft class if it was just about athletic ability.
2.
Who the hell would think Luther Head or Dee Brown is anywhere near Deron Williams? This is a pretty awful attempt on your part. It's like you didn't bother reading once you read the thread title and just started with reckless abandon.noel is ed davis before the meniscus injury
tremonthustler1
aka bx_representer
UCLA is also known as a program under Ben Howland that depresses your numbers based on the style he plays. You're certain of 2 things: your guards will be good NBA defenders and their scoring will improve as a pro.
Marvel
Psalm 149:5-9
True, all his players way better pros than I thought they would have been coming out. Howland be holding them back
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
I definitely remember Ricky Davis with all his boneheaded plays he made over the years. All the talent in the world but had no IQ at all on the court. And i also think Oladipo is a better prospect than Waiters. And i think Waiters wil be ok once he learns to pass and understand what a good shot is. So if Victor is rated higher than him than the sky is the limit for him. It's just all up to him to do it.
Shabazz has the same chance as Victor to be a superstar. He's already a better scorer than him. And if Harden is who you compare Shabazz too that ain't to bad a player to be compared to. Harden may not be on the Bron KD Kobe level but he's just under that.
Kevin Love is a prime example of that right?
Most of those guys had defensive potential before they got there.
Do you watch college basketball, do you even see how UCLA and Indiana plays. They don't play like K State or Texas. No one is average more than 18PPG in that system. IU has two potential 20PPG+ NBA scorers in Zeller and Oladipo. Westbrook wasn't the #1 leading scorer. Love was at 17.5 PPG.
You making excuses.
tremonthustler1
aka bx_representer
He a guard?
But even Kev's offensive numbers are much different now than when he was at UCLA.
Shabazz is more skilled but that doesn't mean nothing. Bayless was more skilled than Westbrook in 08. Shabazz doesn't have the elite athleticism to become an elite player. Victor has elite quickness, first step, explosiveness, BBIQ, and elite defensive tools. Also Bazz efficiency is NCAA good. The kid isn't a very efficient Basketball player at this stage for a NBA prospect. He screams a player that will struggle in the NBA as a rookie. Harden might be the most skilled player aside from Kobe and is more skilled coming out of Zona St than Wade. Wade was just a much better player coming out of Marquette and is an elite talent. I am not in love with Bazz. Not in love watching him play. Not in love with his numbers. The only thing I love is his size, has good BBIQ, strength, and his skill-set is highly advanced for his age. I prefer McLemore, you can win more with him.
Oh, Oladipo is a superior scorer to Bazz.
He a guard?
But even Kev's offensive numbers are much different now than when he was at UCLA.
Jordan Farmar is a lock down defender.
Come on son, you acting like Collison is a good defender. The only UCLA defenders you are probably thinking of is Affalo and Westbrook who had defensive potential before they arrived in Westwood.
Im skeptical of Shabazz and Victor being stars. But i still say Bazz has just as much potential as Victor Oladipo. Shabazz may not be an elite athlete like Vic but he's defintely above average. And he's getting 18 a game on a decent fg percentage in Howland's system. That has showed me that he will be 20 ppg game scorer in the NBA one day.
tremonthustler1
aka bx_representer
Jordan Farmar is a lock down defender.
Come on son, you acting like Collison is a good defender. The only UCLA defenders you are probably thinking of is Affalo and Westbrook who had defensive potential before they arrived in Westwood.
For a guy his size, he's actually not bad man to man.
