Fire by Arthur Brown is not far right and can be found in many places. That aside, it is not hard to find most kinds of music on the internet with ease.
Brown stunned by ‘Fire’ use in New Zealand massacre
My problem with all of this is this: Assuming music
is to blame, influences is a contributing factor:
We have person A being reacting violently while person B is not. For some reason, instead of asking why Person A is reacting violently to said music, especially since Person A is the anomaly since he is in the minority of people effected by music as he is, we are skipping over all of that and just outright putting blame on the music, even merely saying it is a contributing factor, one is still affixing blame to it. That doesn't make sense to me. We should be looking at the people supposedly effected and figure out why they are affected as they are since if the music made them act in this manner, how do we know what else will make them act in that manner? This is why I'm baffled by what I feel is a reactionary approach to the issue. It's not going to fix anything since even under the idea that music is to blame or a contributing factor, it does not get down to the heart of the matter and instead, does what is all too common in this country and puts a flimsy band-aid on the issue. Even more, it ignores the complex action that is crime. There's too many things ignored in all of this.