TSC Evaluation #105: Brock Lesnar

Overall Rating


  • Total voters
    106

R=G

Street Terrorist
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
122,983
Reputation
8,320
Daps
145,329
Reppin
Westcoast
Lesnar is nowhere near the Mount Rushmore of pro wrestling. The ratings in this thread look wrestlingforum.com level. Utterly silly. Guy got like two years of real work and squash matches for most of his 2014-today run. Beyond silly.
 

Hey_zeus

Veteran
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
52,482
Reputation
5,046
Daps
161,192
Reppin
Chicago
First run Brock had GOAT potential. A legit athlete with size and speed. That could sell, work with anyone and was a good heel and face. 9.

Second run Brock was more spectacle than anything that has deteriorated into a spot monkey for one move. Matches that should have been good were boring and uneventful because of how he was booked to keep his heat regardless of how it effected this rest of the roster. The fleecing of Vince is the one admirable thing about this second run. 7.

8.
 

Playaz Eyez

Veteran
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
45,107
Reputation
7,410
Daps
130,279
I hope most of the people lowballing Lesnar did the same to Mark Henry (who I gave an 8). Mark Henry had a shorter hot streak than Lesnar, wrestled 6 years longer, had lots of injuries and involved in one of the worst storylines ever.

And I had them both higher than Orton :sas2:
 

Cartier Murphy

Apathy’s a Tragedy & Boredom is a Crime
Joined
May 10, 2015
Messages
9,797
Reputation
1,860
Daps
44,035
I was a Brock Lesnar Stan back in his OG run when I was a kid. This dude was a force of nature that literally came out of nowhere and took the WWE by storm, at a time when star power was at an all time high. Having taken out Hoegan, Rock, Taker, Flair, Angle, etc. in your rookie year with the performances to back it up is no small feat. Between the athleticism, power, and speed he was so fun to watch and play as in the WWE games at the time. He only got better each year too, Lesnar by 2003/4 was an amazing performer. That heel run from summer 03 on is straight piff. Him murdering Zack Gowen was one of those :banderas: moments, an insanely violent yet entertaining spectacle. There was a noticeable hole in the roster after he left, especially with a replacement like JBL. It’s a shame we’d never see how good he could’ve gotten if he stayed.

From 2012 on is basically the tale of two wrestlers. He looked like a beast in his return match, but to me they immediately ruined him with the loss. The HHH feud felt forced but, I liked 2/3 of their matches if I’m being honest :manny: they were all slow but only the Mania match was boring as sin, the two surrounding it were well worked IMO. The Punk match is a classic, and his 14-15 run is an all time great run. Where the wheels fell off was after Mania 31. I’ve seen @Miami316 touch on it before, but WWE getting gun shy with Reigns had a trickle down effect on everyone else. Rollins had to go over at Mania so the show wouldn’t end with fans booing it to the very end, Reigns had to drop down to the midcard to cool some of that heat off, and Brock had to have a forced feud with Taker to stay busy because they hadn’t yet anointed their guy, so they didn’t build anyone else up to be on the level of facing Brock. The matches were entertaining spectacles but narratively made no sense. Taker had since returned and made no reference or anything to the Streak loss, including squashing Bray at Mania to get his mojo back. But he suddenly targets Brock in the summer because? :manny:

From then on dude was phone it in master and while I don’t 100% fault him, the money was easy and the creative sucked, it was disappointing to see. His match with Ambrose was one of the few matches I looked forward to at that Mania and it was mostly a tame squash match. As was mostly anything else he was involved in. I actually totally enjoyed the Goldberg feud from start to finish :ehh: his best work post Punk feud. He had a lot of good, motivated bumping and selling during that Universal title run and everybody he faced looked super impressive against him, it was just again unfortunate he didn’t deviate from the Suplex City routine by then.

Call it an 8. His last few years are a big blemish on an otherwise excellent career.
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

Drink wolf cola
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
31,595
Reputation
9,601
Daps
106,484
Reppin
Brooklyn
@Cardinal Murphy I’m glad you mentioned my touching on that. The last 3 years have been spent intentionally sabotaging the entire roster/show to prop up Roman and feed people to him. Brock was the hottest name on the roster in March of 2015. Well, him or Bryan. He was crazy over as a face in mid 2015. Then they stopped booking him as a central part of a story or focusing on him in particular and used him as a plot device. It’s crystal clear that he started getting lazy around then.
 

2CT

Prolific Poster
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
35,460
Reputation
19,462
Daps
158,227
Reppin
My Own 🌍
IMO anything 5 or below is trash

6-7 is average

8 is above average and 9-10 is legendary

so with that being said i gotta go with an 8 for Brock, dude is definitely an above average talent but i have an extremely hard time calling him great or legendary especially with his recent Universal title run which was mailing it in to the fullest

Ambrose even spoke on how Brock wasn’t willing to do shyt for their WM match and i can’t respect that, great and legendary wrestlers don’t do shyt like that

his first run was incredible though and as an early teenager i was a huge stan :pachaha: me and my homie used to have heated debates about who was better between him and Goldberg

so when WM 20 came around my homie tried to rub it in but i had to remind that nikka that it was fake and Brock only lost cause he was leaving the company :ufdup:

but yeah i’m going with an 8 for The Beast Incarnate
 
Last edited:

mrken12

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
80,804
Reputation
20,860
Daps
300,317
Reppin
Maryland
Pretty sure people felt like Orton was boring as shyt long before that happened.

Ed G was the biggest Orton fan on the planet but he did a complete 180 and started shytting on him like everyone else. :mjlol: Ed is always so extreme with his love and hatred. It's almost to a Cornette level.
 

Chris Cool

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
30,831
Reputation
7,026
Daps
108,529
Reppin
So Cal
Can't go higher than 8. His first run was when nikkas was too cool to be watching that garbage. Latest run been:russell:for years.
 

Yayo Toure

Mighty Man City
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
10,948
Reputation
786
Daps
22,585
Dont see how everyone is giving a dude who can't promo, never improved in his promos, and has phoned it in the past 4 years a 10.

He's an 8 for me.
 

Playaz Eyez

Veteran
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
45,107
Reputation
7,410
Daps
130,279
IMO anything 5 or below is trash

6-7 is average

8 is above average and 9-10 is legendary

so with that being said i gotta go with an 8 for Brock, dude is definitely an above average talent but i have an extremely hard time calling him great or legendary especially with his recent Universal title run which was mailing it in to the fullest

Ambrose even spoke on how Brock wasn’t willing to do shyt for their WM match and i can’t respect that, great and legendary wrestlers don’t do shyt like that

his first run was incredible though and as an early teenager i was a huge stan :pachaha: me and my homie used to have heated debates about who was better between him and Goldberg

so when WM 20 came around my homie tried to rub it in but i had to remind that nikka that it was fake and Brock only lost cause he was leaving the company :ufdup:

but yeah i’m going with an 8 for The Beast Incarnate

Austin, HBK, and Undertaker all in some way did this, and I’m sure everyone on here would have them as a 9+ :pachaha:
 

2CT

Prolific Poster
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
35,460
Reputation
19,462
Daps
158,227
Reppin
My Own 🌍
Austin, HBK, and Undertaker all in some way did this, and I’m sure everyone on here would have them as a 9+ :pachaha:

Austin, HBK and Taker never had a weak match at WM due to them being unwilling to properly participate in the match bruh

i’ll admit it’s hearsay cause Ambrose coulda been exaggerating or flat out lying but it is what it is :yeshrug: i gave dude an 8 cause though he’s good he ain’t on Austin, HBK or Taker’s level
 

BrehWyatt

Let me work.
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
21,118
Reputation
2,309
Daps
56,678
Reppin
#TSC
Mic Skills - 8. By himself, he's mediocre outside of a few one-liners ("Suplex City, bytch :birdman:") but you have to take into account Paul Heyman's mic skills (10) since he did the talking for him.

Personality/gimmick - 10. One of the most believable destroyers ever. Not to mention, he could sell when required (see: his first WWE run). Just so happens his last run was full of typical squash-matches.

Ring work - 8.5, 9. Everything he did, I believed it hurt and it fit his gimmick. Not to mention the first time I saw the F-5 I audibly marked out on some :ooh: shyt. Was a natural at the shyt. Not quite Kurt Angle level in terms of how quickly he picked it up, but still. He plays his role as well as anybody.

Overall: 8, 8.5. Longevity hurts him here, but anybody who gave him a 9-10 gets no argument from me. :hubie:
 
Top