Toe Jay Simpson
Searchin’
10. You can’t hold this run against him no more than Jordan’s Wizard run.
Nope. He’s doing exactly what they ask him to do: act like a disinterested jerk in hopes that it’ll make the crowd like his opponent. If he was working with people who are over with the hope of putting on a great show, he might try and give a good show.10. You can’t hold this run against him no more than Jordan’s Wizard run.
But a 2 year run will never be Mount Rushmore status. No sane person is ranking Lesnar over The Rock, Stone Cold, Ric Flair, Randy Savage, Bret Hart, Shawn Michaels, Chris Jericho, Kurt Angle, and Undertaker. All of them had longer primes and were better all-around performers. That's not even including non-American wrestlers and wrestlers who weren't on the mega elite level like John Cena and CM Punk. If Brock never wrestled again after 2004, all of the people that I mentioned still would be ahead of him.You could argue that run is better than some 5-10 year runs, hell entire careers
@mrken12 id like to nominate macho man randy savage for an evaluation...he needs more mention in TSC
All of that stuff mentioned was pretty bad except some unintentional comedy and ridiculous booking choices.Nope. He’s doing exactly what they ask him to do: act like a disinterested jerk in hopes that it’ll make the crowd like his opponent. If he was working with people who are over with the hope of putting on a great show, he might try and give a good show.
Since he returned, he’s been in 4 matches with cena, 3 matches with triple h, 1 with the big show, 3 with the undertaker (who he’d already feuded with twice during his initial run), 2 against Goldberg not including his short stint in the 2017 royal rumble match, and Roman 5 times.
Here’s his wrestlemania matches since his return:
2013: triple h (dud)
2014: undertaker (dud, though taker’s concussion played a part)
2015: Roman (good match largely due to the ending)
2016: Ambrose (dud)
2017: Goldberg (match didn’t even go 6 minutes)
2018: Roman (the crowd was chanting this is awful)
A lot of them didn’t even get a good build either. The only mania match he’s had since returning against a new star who was actually over had a nothing build thrown together a month before the match.
It's not even in the same universe than Goldberg really..yet alone Rock or Steve Austin. Rock and Austin saved Monday Night Raw and outdrew the Nwo, Sting, DX, Hogan, Flair, Undertaker, etc. Lesnar is huge in UFC but hes just pushed real hard in the WWE in basic squash segments/matches. Some of the most predictable matches ever.But a 2 year run will never be Mount Rushmore status. No sane person is ranking Lesnar over The Rock, Stone Cold, Ric Flair, Randy Savage, Bret Hart, Shawn Michaels, Chris Jericho, Kurt Angle, and Undertaker. All of them had longer primes and were better all-around performers. That's not even including non-American wrestlers and wrestlers who weren't on the mega elite level like John Cena and CM Punk. If Brock never wrestled again after 2004, all of the people that I mentioned still would be ahead of him.
I’m against The HBGOAT thread. Can you do it without being biased? Him and the Rock are the most polarizing figures the sport has ever seen.I could do that. To end the series with a bang, I could cover all of the megastars in wrestling. I'll even include Shawn Michaels. I expect that thread to be very . No Hoegan thread though.
Matches were 5 years ago..lol. The Joe matches were damn near squashes....the Cena matches? Lol. The Rollins triple threat was good.Mic-5. Limited but very convincing in taped segments.
Star power/presence-10. He wrestles, looks, and carries himself like a superhuman.
Ring-10. This run has had some standouts, some of you are just getting worked by this "he doesn't care storyline" that's aimed at putting Roman over. Vs Joe, Vs Cena multiple times, triple threat vs Rollins and Cena, first time vs Reigns... Everybody loved the Punk match at the time too.
Lmao..mount Rushmore of what? Best paid for squash work? He would be up there with Goldberg and Warrior..no doubt.He’s already on Mount Rushmore. Has his deficiencies but is a 10 regardless.
Yep this confirmed it. Brock a 6? You are being biased.I give him a 6. I really tried to be objective but I can't give out high scores just because someone had a 2 year run of greatness 15 years ago.
Also it's hard to overlook the coasting he's been doing solely from that 2 year run. A lot of people here have given passes for his subpar work just because of how good he used to be. In fact, he's spent more years being lazy and bland than being an engaging entertaining performer. He never evolved as a wrestler and he was lucky to work with an all-time great manager. His lackadaisical performances are even more inexcusable because guys like The Big Show and The Undertaker were able to evolve and adapt later in their careers and had way more mileage.
Yep this confirmed it. Brock a 6? You are being biased.
I’m against The HBGOAT thread. Can you do it without being biased?