Tired of this Gay Agenda in America

SunZoo

The Legendary Super Sapien.
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
34,676
Reputation
12,320
Daps
132,159
Reppin
T.L.C.
WTF is this gay marriage bs I just saw on the grammys..a bunch of men getting married together and crying like little b*tches. I am pissed right now that they keep forcing the issue and we just have to deal with it, they have more power and support than blacks...

I just wanted to vent and if you are gay f*ck you too

You aren't even from here...why do you care? Go back "home" where it's safe to murder gays in public without repercussion, you fukking neanderthal :laugh:

Acceptance and tolerance for everyone accept black people is that 2014 shyt. Yea, embrace the future. :blessed:

Fight for the rights of white cacs, that are already overpriveleged and watch white fakkits justify the deaths of black teens that get killed by Whites.

You fight for them but when you need them, at best they'll give you a shout out on twitter.

This pro-black angle in regards to this shyt is laughable. Just admit that you're worried about how you'd react if someone waved their dikk in your face and KIM.

If you really "pro-black" you must be aware that there are black folk in the LBGT community, or do they not count because you think what they do behind closed doors is "icky"? I mean fukk the fact that they will catch enough hell just from being black from everybody else, they need to be on-guard from their "own" too, under the guise of pro-blackness no less.

:stopitslime:
 
Last edited:

Taadow

The StarchBishop™️
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
40,621
Reputation
9,658
Daps
101,422
Reppin
Crispness
yes I have and I trying to figure out if thats what came from God teachings our just thrown in there by some old dudes.

No offense but the bible is one of the most inconsistent book out of all the books of god. The Quran can be :patrice: at times also.

Universal means love everyone, even the ones thats deemed bad which is why I dont have a problem with gay people

Again, "universal love" is not written anywhere in the Scriptures.

That said - gay people have the same free will everyone else has and can (or should be able to) use it as they wish.
To not interfere with that and let them cook is to show them love, but that doesn't mean you love what they practice.
 

Just like bruddas

Couple shooters in the cut.
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,803
Reputation
4,155
Daps
51,650
I don't think black people shouldnt be even discuss being prejudice to anyone, with our history and struggles just to be accepted. Think we should just watch from the sidelines and focus on building a community that wouldnt be shaken by something so simple as :"love"
 

Just like bruddas

Couple shooters in the cut.
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,803
Reputation
4,155
Daps
51,650
Again, "universal love" is not written anywhere in the Scriptures.

That said - gay people have the same free will everyone else has and can (or should be able to) use it as they wish.
To not interfere with that and let them cook is to show them love, but that doesn't mean you love what they practice.

and you saying what they practice is wrong. correct?
 

JJ Lions

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
2,625
Reputation
-235
Daps
6,379
Reppin
NULL
Son, you don't know anything about me...I studied the Bible all by myself because virtually the whole world has been affected by it, and I wanted to see what it says for myself.
It's good to know such just for occasions like this, when I can know when I can know someone doesn't know what they're talking about regarding it.
It would be wise for anyone else to do the same - that would be the "grown" thing to do...

I don't read fairy tales, especially a book that is based in incest - https://bible.org/question/was-worl...or-did-god-create-others-besides-adam-and-eve

For live to go on, Adam and Eve's kids had to have sex with each other. God, being all powerful (again, if you believe in that fairy tale) had the power to create many couples, so incest didn't have to take place. But he setup the incestual situation. So you have a problem with Americans getting rights, based on a book that's cool with incest.
 

Pazzy

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
26,660
Reputation
-7,038
Daps
42,932
Reppin
NULL
bottom line...stay out of people's bedrooms.

let people live their lives.
adults can and will have sex with other adults no matter what is between the legs.

it has been that way before we can know and is that way now.
i don't care what goes on with other people's sex lives.

uhhh.. being gay is MORE than just sex. i like how folks in here are smartening up towards gay rights. however, there's this huge misunderstanding about what being gay is. for those of you that don't get it, being gay is just like being straight except it's with someone of the same sex with the attraction, crushes, dating, romance, sex or whatever. to say that being gay is all about sex, what someone does in the bedroom and etc is basically ignorance. some of ya'll need to stop acting like we're aliens or different people altogether because we're gay. it's stupid.
 

JJ Lions

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
2,625
Reputation
-235
Daps
6,379
Reppin
NULL
They sure did...at first.

You know why?

Obviously God was into incest. He could have made Adam and Eve, Bill and Shirley, Lamont and LeQuisha etc. And based on how many priests like to mess with kids, maybe pedophilia as well. You figure he would have struck them down before they could lay a finger on those children. You know, being all powerful and stuff. Slowly, very slowly, people are evolving and more and more people coming up consider themselves non-religious, which is good for society.

You can go back to your fairy tales and come up with a reason why incest is ok. It never is.
 

Mountain

All Star
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
4,121
Reputation
730
Daps
8,671
Reppin
more money

lol @ how everyone ignored this post

The former group -- those who want to have sex with children but whose desires are not distressing or harmful to themselves or others -- is no longer classified as having a psychiatric condition in the updated DSM.

sounds real familiar...

The DSM has consistently evolved in its views on sexuality. As Jillian Keenan points out at Slate, the first version of the DSM called any kind of homosexuality a mental disorder, but in the 1960s it was changed to say that people who were comfortable being gay didn't have a psychiatric condition.

Next step for you fatherless fakkits: defendin pedos jerkin of to kiddie porn and not callin that sht a mental disorder :yes:
 

Bay Area

Raiders/Warriors/A's
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
11,410
Reputation
3,200
Daps
38,611
Reppin
East Oakland
This whole debate reminds me of black and feminist rights in the 1800s. (I have the college history books in case yall want to fact check me). Feminists of all colors put in work with the abolitionists to give black men the right to vote but we turned our backs on them when it came time to fight for their rights and didnt even allow women in conventions. Yall have so much conviction for one cause then are so ignorant to another. Makes me think that if yall were born with white skin you would be as passionate for white supremacy as you are towards black rights.
 
Top