Also debunk this Mr. Anthropologist and I'll email them that you've just found a breakthrough
This was during the Roman period. We KNOW Roman London was diverse. Your source even makes it clear that this is Roman London. Your point?
Also debunk this Mr. Anthropologist and I'll email them that you've just found a breakthrough
Are you doing to post more purposely darkened paintings?
You want me to do that???Go ahead and prove every single piece of artwork was darkened?
Go ahead. If u can I'll salute u
BTW ur also saying Runoko Rashidi's African presence in Early Europe is Bullshyt too right
And u still haven't refuted anything . Just keep using the I'm white and I say so rule lolU said ALL of those pieces of artwork were darkened so prove it already and stop deflecting alreadylol... Don't even try to school me on African history. You had Ethiopians who lived on Indian Islands and formed dynasties there. Bet you didn't know that. You had Somalis who colonized Malta, bet you didn't know that. You had Swahili sailors in China and India. You had Ethiopians colonizing Southern Arabia. Hell the Swahilis could have colonized many islands in the Indian Ocean. And of course we know Nubians and Egyptians colonizing Levant.
While you're desperate to try and be European I bet you didn't even know this.
Unravelling the mystery of Arnhem Land's ancient African coins
The only one making up their own facts is you... You tried to claim King Edward III as BLACK!!! And yet you say you're not trying to be a European.
There were Moors that had dark skinned. Are you going to say they had no ties to Black Africans whatso ever?
And u still haven't refuted anything . Just keep using the I'm white and I say so rule lolU said ALL of those pieces of artwork were darkened so prove it already and stop deflecting already
Like I said they have fake pictures and busts of plenty of people . If it's so hard for u to believe that people have changed the race of certain historical figures then oh well. Hell people thought that bust of Nefertiti was real for the longest
And how do u know it wasn't whitened upLike I said u don't have proof of shyt. The I'm white and I say so rule. U live by thatYou want me to do that???
Realhistory.com The St Clement of Rome
Are you gonna say the latter painting is whitened?
Yes, Runoko Rashidi is one of the biggest hoteps. He almost ruined the good book "When We Ruled" for me. This is the same guy that tries to say the early Indians, Sumerians, Vietnamese, Chinese, Olmecs were black...
I'm really not sure what narrative you're trying to push with these images. It's no coincidence that a lot of these artworks you're posting are from the 15th and 16th century, when Portugal began colonizing Guinea and around the time when the Kingdom of Kongo became recognized as a Christian state by the Vatican and thus making it diplomatically tied to the other European kingdoms who were still in servitude to the church at the time. This was also when Europeans began getting involved with the African slave trade in earnest, but before they had Colonies in the Americas to ship them off to for plantation labor. Obviously, this period entailed some interaction with the aristocratic European class and their Kongolese counterparts, who would come to Europe for diplomatic reasons or to enroll in Universities. A lot of other members of European nobility interacted with Africans because they were purchased as slaves, or colonial subjects and were employed as servants, entertainers, and handmaidens to those with the status or wealth to afford them, which was very much in vogue at the time. Since painters and artists in those days, even if they weren't noble themselves, worked for or were in patronage with the people that were, they likewise would have the opportunity to be exposed to Africans living in Europe moreso than the average European commonor, but their population was rather smallMore "WHITE" people