explain? when was he in the wrong?
I didn't listen to the whole show so I might have missed him explaining things. He was on point with a few things (separating RACE issues from CLASS issues)
- there not being any poor Asians (that was a stupid suggestion by that dude)
- the distinction between class issues and race issues
but here were some of the biggies I remember
- he blew off the very important point about %ages in the discussion of welfare
- he kept arguing against white people making generalizations, but damn near every gripe he had against non-blacks were gross generalizations
- he was angry based on the generalization that white people only want to live around + hire + work with white people. But generally speaking, people do tend to stick to their own kind... he would have no gripes w/blacks wanting to hire + work with + live with blacks. HEll he just said he does that on that UStream recording.
And he cut that dude off plenty of times
Maybe racist wasn't the right word cause I know how sensitive people are to it and have different definitions. But he does a lot of the shyt he is angry at all white folks for doing. He claims to be impartial and when hes calm he will throw in his "b-b-but theres exceptions to every rule" caveats. But when he gets angry/charged up (like he was on this show) all that shyt goes out the window. He has a preconceived notion of certain groups of people, and seeks out evidence to back that claim up (just like the dude who called in). I was pretty disappointed.