Essential The Official ESPN Insider Thread (ESPN+)

muzikfrk75

#4080
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,510
Reputation
1,300
Daps
25,850
Reppin
336
Playoffs: Scouting Thunder-Spurs

Analyzing Oklahoma City-San Antonio with expert scouting and advanced stats

It's a rematch of the 2012 Western Conference finals, and wouldn't you know it, the basketball gods have made a house call to the Oklahoma City Thunder again.

After overcoming the straitjacket defense of Memphis in the first round and receiving a tiny bit of luck to defeat the Clippers in the conference semifinals, the injury bug has claimed a key member from the Thunder's roster for the second straight postseason. Meanwhile, theSan Antonio Spurs had their own scare in the first round against a pesky Dallas team, but eventually righted the ship and crushed Portland in the conference semifinals. In the process, Tony Parker suffered a strained hamstring, but he's expected to play through it.

Can the Thunder fulfill their destiny as the next great NBA team, or will the Spurs take one step closer to avenging the sins of last season?

okc.gif
sas.gif



QUESTION 1: Serge Ibaka suffered a calf injury and is out for the remainder of the playoffs. In what unexpected aspect will his absence hurt the most?




Elhassan: His offense! Ibaka has developed into quite the two-way player, as one of the best midrange shooters in the game with range that extends all the way out to corner 3-pointers. In Oklahoma City's bare-bones offensive schemes, the importance of having reliable, knock-down catch-and-shoot options cannot be understated. This effect has intensified during the playoffs, where the Thunder are 10 points per 100 possessions better on offense when Ibaka is on the floor than when he's off it. That's not to say he's an offensive dynamo; rather, his presence makes life easier for his teammates, Kevin Durantand Russell Westbrook. Without Ibaka keeping defenses honest, those two will have to deal with a more compact defense that will seek to gamble more.


Doolittle: I'll start with the intangible: How discouraging does it have to be for a championship contender to lose a top-three player during the playoffs two years in a row? If this were Durant, then forget it -- it's a sweep for the Spurs. Another injury to Westbrook wouldn't spell certain doom, but something close to it. Ibaka? This injury is not good, for sure, being that he was second on OKC in WARP (Westbrook would have been higher if not for his 36 missed games), and 22nd in the league. So that's taking All-Star value off your roster. The Thunder depth has not impressed me much this season, but now it will really be tested.

As for the tangible effect, according to NBA.com, the Thunder were 7.8 points better per 48 minutes with Ibaka on the floor. Believe it or not, most of that was due to the offense falling when he sat (as Amin pointed out). The defense was actually worse with him on the floor. This tells you a lot about the contrasting strengths of Ibaka and Nick Collison. I think the OKC offense will take the bigger hit, because Ibaka's knock-down jumper is the perfect third option to the Westbrook-Durant combo, and bails out an awful lot of stagnant possessions. The spacing will also be an issue with him out. To put numbers to it, OKC shot 46.5 percent from medium range with Ibaka on the floor, but just 35.7 percent from there with him on the bench.

QUESTION 2: A silver lining to Ibaka's injury is that Scott Brooks stumbled upon the extremely effective frontline combo of Collison andSteven Adams. Should they stick with this lineup against San Antonio?

Elhassan: Collison and Adams played only 30 minutes together with Westbrook and Durant during the regular season; they've almost matched that total in the postseason, with 23 minutes. During that time, Oklahoma City has been a plus-19, benefiting from their physical play in the paint and the upgraded offensive efficiency, especially the passing of Collison. Against the Spurs, however, the Thunder will be facing a big, savvy front line with Tim Duncan, Tiago Splitter and Boris Diaw -- all high-IQ players with considerable length (or in Diaw's case, mass). Oklahoma City might be better suited playing small-ball lineups withCaron Butler or even Durant at the 4, and using either Collison or Adams at the 5. Anything that keeps Kendrick Perkins off the floor!

Doolittle: Look at the depth chart. What other options are there? Collison may not be able to space the floor like Ibaka, though his newfound ability to hit corner 3s could come in handy. He always has a positive impact one way or another, ranking second on OKC in rebounds per minute this season. Adams can really play, and he gives the team some attitude, but his Bill Laimbeer imitation is unlikely to rattle the veteran Spurs. Also, those two plus Perkins have combined to average 22.7 fouls per 48 minutes during the playoffs. They better cut that down drastically, or we'll be seeing a whole lot of Hasheem Thabeet.

The best bet is a small lineup with Durant at the 4 and Butler at the 3, with Adams in the middle to check Duncan. That trio has been outscored by 8.9 points per 48 minutes during the playoffs, but during the regular season it was plus-11.5, albeit in just 58 minutes. I don't see "more Kendrick Perkins" as an attractive option.


QUESTION 3: Oklahoma City swept the Spurs in the regular season, and has won 10 of the past 12 meetings between the two teams dating back to the 2012 Western Conference finals. Why have the Thunder been such a thorn in San Antonio's side?

Elhassan: Oklahoma City's length and athleticism seem to bother San Antonio more than you'd expect. Offensively, they're able to create shots for themselves that other players can't; almost every field goal attempt for Durant is a highly makeable shot, and Westbrook's explosiveness gets him into high-percentage areas from anywhere on the floor, with the strength to finish through contact. Defensively, the Thunder want to prevent or contest shots near the rim, and they rely on their length and athleticism on the perimeter to close out to shooters and contest. However, a big part of this defensive success was based on the availability of Ibaka as a defensive anchor; without him, Oklahoma City can't afford to be as aggressive.


Doolittle: Here's the good news from the Ibaka situation: Without Ibaka on the floor, Oklahoma City has outscored the Spurs by 8.7 points per 48, versus 9.4 with him, so the drop-off hasn't been significant. The Thunder offense has been the driving force behind its recent dominance of the Spurs, as they've shot 40.7 percent from 3-point range in eight games over the last two seasons, on more than 18 attempts per game.

But you have to worry if Ibaka's absence will mean fewer instances in which Duncan is drawn out of the lane, meaning the Spurs can run the Thunder off the arc knowing that the Big Fundamental is there to protect the rim. And Ibaka won't be there to protect the rim at the other end, where he has blocked 16 shots by Duncan, Parker and Splitter over the last two seasons.

Predictions


Elhassan: Spurs in six games. Let the record show that I thought San Antonio would win even if Ibaka were healthy. But with his injury, the odds swing more heavily in the Spurs' favor. Also, despite the individual brilliance of Durant and Westbrook, I can't imagine the simplicity of their offensive schemes can overcome Gregg Popovich's grandmaster chess game.

Don't be surprised if: The Spurs defend Westbrook and Durant using schemes that they did not unveil during the regular season. San Antonio switched up the way it defendedLaMarcus Aldridge in pick and pops for their series, to great success.

Doolittle: Spurs in six games. This was my pick before the Ibaka news dropped, and I considered making it five. But the OKC big two is still better than the Spurs' big two at this point, and that should keep them in most games. Ultimately, there is just two much of an edge for San Antonio on roster spots No. 3 through 10.

Don't be surprised if: One of the three forgotten end-of-bench players for OKC ends up playing an important role: Jeremy Lamb, Thabeet, or Perry Jones III.

Log5 probabilities: 63 percent chance Spurs win series.

 

muzikfrk75

#4080
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,510
Reputation
1,300
Daps
25,850
Reppin
336
@Skooby If you got the time, could you post this article for me? Thanks

Minnesota Twins an example of how not to build a team - MLB - ESPN


Once again, major league baseball players are striking out at previously unseen levels, with 20.5 percent of plate appearances ending in a whiff, which would set a record for the ninth year in a row. And once again, the Minnesota Twins' pitching staff is doing its best to go against that trend.


Twins pitchers currently sit in last place in strikeout percentage; their 14.9 percent whiff rate is a full 1.6 percent behind the No. 29 White Sox. (If you prefer K/9, their 5.85 rate is also in last place, well below the league average of 7.85.) Not that this is new. The Twins had the majors' lowest strikeout percentage rates in 2011, '12 and '13 as well.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Twins' cumulative pitching strikeout percentage dating to 2010 pulls up the rear by a considerable amount:



mlb_r_twins-strikeout_mb_576x324.jpg
Mike PetrielloTwins pitchers have far and away the lowest strikeout rate in MLB since 2010.


This is, of course, embedded in the Twins' DNA. It's who they are, endlessly giving innings to low-upside and low-strikeout pitchers like Brian Duensing, Nick Blackburn, Carl Pavano,Scott Diamond and Kevin Correia, and it's part of the reason they're 72 games under .500 in that span.

But this year, they're treading into some particularly dangerous waters, because the roster they've assembled is the worst-case scenario: They have a staff full of pitchers who allow balls to be put in play in front of a defense that isn't particularly effective at turning those balls into outs.

An offensive defense






Defense can be measured a few ways, though none of them are without their issues over a small sample size. But when they're all generally saying the same thing -- that the Twins' defense is quite poor -- it's difficult to toss that data away. Defensive runs saved, for example, has the Twins at minus-23, just barely ahead of the last-place Indians. (The Cardinals currently lead the majors with 29 DRS.) UZR/150 has the Twins at minus-4.8, 23rd best. They are middle of the pack in errors, if you care about that, but they might be worse if they could get to more balls; they're No. 26 in range runs, which is determined by FanGraphs "by how the fielder is able to get to balls hit in his vicinity."

It goes beyond just the fact that the overall defense isn't great, because the Twins have managed to build a staff that specifically caters to the weakness of their fielders. Right now, Twins pitchers are allowing fly balls at a 38.4 percent rate, tied with the Angels for the most in baseball. That's not necessarily a bad thing; fly balls that don't leave the park -- and the 8.0 percent HR/FB rate Minnesota has is solid enough -- generally turn into outs at a higher rate than grounders do.

But despite allowing the same rate of fly balls, the outcomes for the Twins and Angels have been very different. Although the Angels walk more batters and allow slightly more home runs, they have allowed 28 fewer runs than the Twins while playing one more game. One reason is they have pitchers who can actually miss bats; their strikeout percentage is fourth best in baseball and a full 7.6 percent higher than that of the Twins. They also have something nearly as important: an outfield that actually turns those fly balls into outs.


Outfield shuffle

Looking only at outfielders, the Angels have the best DRS mark in baseball, helped by plus fielders like Mike Trout, J.B. Shuck and Collin Cowgill. The Twins, meanwhile, are in dead last, with a minus-18 mark that represents a full 38-run difference from the Angels.



[+] Enlarge
AP Photo/Carlos OsorioAaron Hicks (career .588 OPS) has failed to establish himself.


That's partly due to injury -- infielders Eduardo Escobar, Eduardo Nunez and Danny Santana have each started in the outfield in the past week -- but mostly due to the fact that the outfielders the Twins have put together just aren't quality defenders. Chris Colabello, in the early conversation for worst defensive outfielder in baseball, was primarily a first baseman in the minors. Jason Kubel was a below-average outfielder in his first stint in Minnesota. Now, as he prepares to turn 32 next week, he's now a disaster with the glove yet has received more defensive playing time than any other Twins outfielder.

Minnesota fans can rightfully point to the fact that the outfielders who were expected to be assets in the field have failed to stick in the lineup for various reasons.Aaron Hicks came to the big leagues with a good defensive reputation, but has failed to show that: He has hit only .185/.270/.315 in parts of two seasons and recently missed time with a concussion. Sam Fuldjoined the team in late April and provided value in center, but he also has not hit much and has had a concussion.

Josh Willingham, never much of an outfielder, hasn't played much this year because of a wrist injury, and he won't be expected to help much with the glove when he returns. The same goes for Oswaldo Arcia, also out with a wrist injury, who is expected to receive significant playing time this year despite some horrendous defensive play in 2013 (minus-15 DRS in just 97 games).

A mess of their own making


While the injuries and Hicks' ineffectiveness have been unfortunate, the Twins put themselves in this position -- partly because they collected defensively challenged players like Kubel and played out-of-position first basemen like Colabello, and partly because of a spring decision that backfired terribly. Minnesota decided to keep 34-year-old Jason Bartlett and use him as an outfielder, a position he'd never played before. (It was a decision made almost entirely because of his clubhouse presence, according to Ron Gardenhire.)

By keeping Bartlett, a shortstop they traded in 2007 and who didn't even play professional baseball in 2013, the Twins lost outfielder Alex Presley -- a competent left fielder -- on waivers to Houston. When Bartlett retired in April, after just three games, zero hits and minus-2 DRS, the Twins were forced to cut loose outfielder Darin Mastroianni because of a paperwork issue related to Bartlett's sudden departure. Mastroanni had 24 stolen bases in only 271 plate appearances with the team, along with average-at-worst defense. But by keeping Bartlett, the Twins received zero production and lost two decent outfielders, and now they're resorting to using inexperienced infielders in the outfield.

Teams can succeed without top-notch defense, as the Detroit Tigers have shown. They can get by without huge strikeout numbers if they have a good defense, as the Pittsburgh Pirates have the past two years. But there's almost no way they can live with both of those things combined. Until one is solved -- or both -- the Twins are doomed for another season without playoff baseball.
 

Skooby

Alone In My Zone
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
25,167
Reputation
10,242
Daps
59,713
Reppin
The Cosmos
Playoffs: Scouting Heat-Pacers

We told you this was inevitable, right? The champion Miami Heat and the East's No. 1 contender, the Indiana Pacers, are finally set for the long-anticipated rematch of last spring's seven-game Conference finals classic. The Heat have more or less cruised to this stage of the season, managing the minutes and effort of their stars through the 82-game slog, landing a good-enough 2-seed and rolling past Charlotte and Brooklyn to get their hunt for a three-peat rolling. Indiana spent most of the last calendar year training in anger for this moment, like Robert DeNiro's character from "Cape Fear." The Pacers' revenge mission was on track until March 4, when Indiana began a long stretch of inconsistency and mediocrity that has been one of the more confounding developments in recent NBA history.

Overall, Indiana has split its last 36 games, but you know what? The Pacers are still here, with the entirety of their yearlong quest still rolled out before them: They are facing the Heat again, they are the No. 1 seed, and they own home-court advantage.

Miami Heat at Indiana Pacers

Eastern Conference finals preview


QUESTION 1: Last season we focused entirely on how the Pacers were a nightmare matchup for Miami. Who makes whom more uncomfortable this time around?

Elhassan: I don't know if the Pacers make the Heat uncomfortable so much as they feel comfortable playing Miami. For whatever reason, they approach playing the defending champs with a lot more confidence than they do an upstart No. 8 seed like Atlanta, despite Miami similarly trotting out small-ball lineups that don't (on paper) match up well with Indiana's frontcourt. Roy Hibbert in particular has been a barometer of success for the Pacers against Miami: In two wins, he averaged 22.5 points on 57 percent shooting and has managed to make his presence felt around the rim by demanding attention on boxouts and discouraging forays to the rim defensively.

Doolittle: Yep, Hibbert is the key. He shined in the wins as you mentioned, but in the losses it was ugly: 5.5 points, 40 percent shooting and just 1.5 boards. If he produces like that in this series, it will be a Miami sweep. Fortunately for the Pacers, the Heat still don't have the post defender who can stand up to Hibbert. Oh, and Greg Oden has been sitting with the team during the playoffs, wearing a very nice looking tailored suit. Perhaps the sight of it will be enough to distract Hibbert.

During the playoffs, it's looked as though Hibbert gets going when he's made the focus of the Indy offense early, and once he gets momentum, he's usually able to sustain it. His energy on the glass and on defense then picks up. Everyone looks at him as the Miami killer, so it's unlikely the Pacers will forget about Hibbert, as has so often happened the last two-plus months. But of course that should have been the case against Atlanta, as well. In any event, it's impossible to predict the performance of a player who is as likely to score four points as he is 20. Of most concern: Hibbert has had just three double-digit rebound games since the beginning of February. The Pacers have been outrebounded during the playoffs, and Miami is 23-2 when they win the rebounding battle, playoffs included. And one of those losses was a one-point, double-overtime defeat to Minnesota.


QUESTION 2: Can the Pacers win without dominating the boards?

Elhassan: Short answer: no. The formula for beating Miami has been a steady diet of offensive rebounding, coupled with a strong post-up 4 or 5, capable wing defenders and backcourt scoring. A lot of what made Indiana a tough out last year was checking all of those boxes. Without the threat of offense created through second- and third-chance opportunities, there is no penalty for Miami running small lineups. This bears out in what we saw during the regular season, where Indiana struggled in the two losses where they weren't able to make a dent on the offensive glass.

Doolittle: No they can't, and they may not have a shot even if Indy gets back to dominating on the offensive glass, which it hasn't been doing in the playoffs. Last season, the Pacers grabbed 32.4 percent of their own misses in the playoffs to lead all teams. This year, they haven't had even one game with a rebound rate that high, and they grabbed six or fewer offensive boards in five of the six games against Washington -- and it certainly wasn't because they were shooting the lights out.

Nevertheless, this Pacers offense needs those second-chance opportunities to score enough points to beat Miami. Unfortunately, Miami has mastered the art of winning without rebounding. Of the Heat's seven worst performances on the defensive glass this season, they've won them all. You can extend that to 26 wins in their 30 lowest defensive rebound percentages. It's pretty amazing when you think about it.


QUESTION 3: The LeBron James versus Paul George matchup is always fascinating to watch. Has George closed the gap at all?

Elhassan: Yes, in the sense that I can close the gap in a race with a guy in a Ferrari if he decides to stop for gas 20 miles in. George is a better and more confident player than he was last year, and he has improved specifically at attacking off the dribble and playmaking. He has a bad knack of resorting to harder shots but can get on a hot streak, and he gives Miami one more offensive threat to worry about.

Defensively, the hope for Indiana is the experience of guarding LeBron over 20 games during the last three seasons has prepared George to be a savvier and more calculating defender. George is not and will never be better than James, but he just needs to be good enough for Indiana to win.

Doolittle: I can't match the Ferrari analogy, but sure, Paul George has continued to improve. He's still nowhere near LeBron's level, which by the way has been stratospheric during the playoffs. According to ESPN Stats & Info, LeBron's 32.9 PER this postseason is the third-highest. Ever. Another nugget from our stats group: The last two seasons on plays in which James and George have guarded each other, LeBron has averaged 16.8 points on 51.5 percent shooting; George is at 6.9 points on 42.7 percent.


Predictions

Elhassan: Heat in 6 games. Despite the relative ease it took Miami to get here (and the struggle for Indiana to get here), I think this series will still be extremely competitive and come down to end-of-game execution.

Don't be surprised if: We see James guarding Hibbert in some late-game situations, freeing up Bosh to deter David West with his length.

Doolittle: Heat in 6 games. The Pacers have proven resilient, so I don't see this as a blowout matchup, and they do have the home-court advantage. But Indy's best-case scenario was to enter this series with the engine humming on all cylinders. Obviously, it is not. Nevertheless, I'd be shocked if we see the same kind of energy lapses that have plagued the Pacers the last two months.

Don't be surprised if: The Lance Stephenson-Dwyane Wade matchup turns out to be the real bellwether for this series. That's probably not good news for the Pacers.

Log5 probabilities: 51 percent chance Pacers win series.
 

Skooby

Alone In My Zone
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
25,167
Reputation
10,242
Daps
59,713
Reppin
The Cosmos
Paul's legacy remains unwritten

So, what do we do with Chris Paul's career so far?

Let's take a look at his résumé.

• Nine brilliant regular seasons at point guard. Seven All-Star appearances. Finished top-5 in MVP voting four times and top-10 five times.

• Led the league in assist rate four times. Is one of three players to average at least 18 points, nine assists and four rebounds in his career (Magic Johnson and Oscar Robertson are the other two).

• Named to five All-Defensive teams and a sixth likely on the way. Has led the NBA in steals per game six times.

• Owns the second-highest career player efficiency rating (25.6) among active players behind LeBron James. Ranks No.1 in career win shares per minute among active players and fourth all-time.

On these individual merits, he's destined to be one of the best point guards to ever play the game. Heck, advanced metrics have placed him on target to be one of the best ever, regardless of position.

But then there's this staggering fact that on Friday seems to hang above all:

Six postseasons, zero trips past the second round.

Oh.

Paul's season ended on Thursday just like all eight that came before it: without a trip to the NBA's final four. Paul's postseason disappointments are not limited to his professional career. In two years at Wake Forest, Paul never made it out of the Sweet 16 despite his team being seeded at No. 2 and No. 4 in his regions.

This does not compute. How can a player so good have such a shallow playoff career?


Faced with this incongruous information, we reflexively send a search party for tidy explanations. Elite point guards don't win titles! Well, tell that to Paul's most frequent comparable, Isiah Thomas. Paul's not a leader! Seems like an odd charge to throw at someone who was elected president of NBA players union. Paul doesn't have "it!" Doesn't get lazier than that.

What makes Paul's case so fascinating is that he checks off just about every box on championship checklist. He's widely known as a ruthless competitor. He pairs incredible basketball IQ with freakish skill. He plays both ends of the floor. He is a team-first player who gets his players involved, sometimes to a fault. And with the obvious exception of Game 5 on Tuesday, he's an assassin in crunch time.

And yet, nothing much to show for it on the team side.

This is where it gets tricky. Measuring player greatness solely through the lens of a player's teams can warp our judgment. If championship rings are the true measuring stick, then Robert Horry (seven titles) is better than Michael Jordan (six). Beno Udrih (two) is greater than championship one-and-dones Kevin Garnett, Dirk Nowitzki and Moses Malone. Adam Morrison is superior to Karl Malone, Charles Barkley, Steve Nash and Elgin Baylor.

Of course, we're smarter than that. Pinning a player's place in history through his team accomplishments can be a futile exercise. And that's especially the case when we do it in the middle of a player's career. James was considered an all-time talent who was fatally flawed until he landed some Hall of Fame teammates. Jordan was considered a me-first, selfish scorer at 26 years old until Phil Jackson came onto the scene. Untimely injuries to key teammates didn't allow Jerry West to win a title until he was 33 years old and now he's the Logo.

Paul deserves similar perspective. And believe it or not, Paul's conference final drought isn't unprecedented. There have been plenty of great players who endured conference finals drought like Paul. Dominique Wilkins is a Hall of Famer and never made it there. Fellow Hall of Famer Bob Lanier played in 13 seasons and eight All-Star games before he reached the Eastern Conference finals in 1983. Vince Carter never got there until 2010.


The Long Road
Most All-Stars before first conference final -- stats from Elias

PlayerAll-Stars
Dominique Wilkins9*
Vince Carter8
Bob Lanier8
Yao Ming8*
Chris Paul (and many others)7
*Never reached


Paul is probably better than all of them. Look, Paul's lack of team success is at the very least meaningful. Greats tend to go far in the playoffs. But it shouldn't be his defining trait. The Clippers were plus-76 with Paul on the floor this postseason and minus-50 with him on the bench and we're going to blame him for missing out on the conference finals?

As I pointed out in November, Paul has been woefully underserved in supporting cast department. To illustrate, contrast Magic Johnson and Paul's surroundings as they began their respective careers. As he entered the league Johnson was gifted with Hall of Famers Kareem Abdul-Jabbar and Jamaal Wilkes then later with James Worthy. Furthermore, Johnson shared the court with an All-Star 13 times in his first eight seasons of his career. Paul? Try just four (David West and Blake Griffin each twice).

Teammates matter. And it's true, Paul has never had a better supporting cast than he did this season and he still couldn't get out of the second round. But it's not as if the Clippers were expected to get there anyway. The Clippers were the third seed in a stacked Western Conference, and both Vegas and ESPN Forecast called the Oklahoma City Thunder to win this series. Considering the odds and the Donald Sterling drama, how much of a letdown is the Clippers' exit, really?

Paul remains a great player who has yet to have great fortune in the postseason. Thursday's loss doesn't change that. As the all-time greats like Jordan, James and West have taught us, if you're going to write Paul's legacy now, you'd better write it in pencil.
 

muzikfrk75

#4080
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,510
Reputation
1,300
Daps
25,850
Reppin
336
Chad Ford Mock Draft 6.0 :blessed:

Cavs get chance for redemption but will Celts and Lakers trade out?

The lottery results are in and the Cleveland Cavaliers are the big winners in this year's NBA draft lottery for the second year in a row. That means it's time for our Mock Draft 6.0. At this point very little is set in stone. Expect this mock draft to continue to fluctuate greatly over the course of the next four weeks. The NBA draft combine just finished last weekend and had a significant impact on our board.

The process of team workouts has just started. Over the next few weeks the adidas Eurocamp and hundreds of team workouts will dramatically alter the face of the draft. But for now, here's our best stab, after talking to numerous NBA team sources, about how the draft might play out on June 26. Remember our mock draft is not a ranking of who we think the top players are. Instead it's a reporting tool to convey our latest intel from NBA scouts and GMs on what each time might do in the draft.

Here we go:



1
Andrew Wiggins
Cleveland Cavaliers (33 - 49)

COLLEGE: Kansas
HT: 6-8
WT: 200
POS: SG


The Cavs win the lottery for the third time in four years. That is pretty incredible. They hit a home run with Kyrie Irving and screwed it up with Anthony Bennett. There�¢??s no guarantee that Luol Deng is going to sign with them this summer and Parker brings high character and a versatile scoring threat. Joel Embiid is another guy to watch here. Anderson Varejao is 32 years old. They need a long-term replacement. But will Dan Gilbert have the patience to wait? I thought they'd to go safe and bring inJabari Parker. However, sources in Cleveland say that Wiggins is the likely choice. The team feels he has the most long-term potential, helps them defensively right out of the gate, can replace Dion Waiters in the starting lineup while adding character to the team.

PLAYER CARD

2
Joel Embiid
Milwaukee Bucks (15 - 67)

COLLEGE: Kansas
HT: 7-0
WT: 250
POS: C


The Bucks really liked Embiid before his back injury. But there are questions about whether they will actually be able to get him in for a physical before the draft. If they can, he is likely the No. 1 pick with Wiggins off the board. If they cannot, Parker or Dante Exum could move into this spot. Parker is the safe pick, but there are concerns that he plays the same position as Giannis Antetokounmpo. Exum could be their point guard of the future, as they would like to move Brandon Knight to the 2.

PLAYER CARD
3
Jabari Parker
Philadelphia 76ers (19 - 63)

COLLEGE: Duke
HT: 6-8
WT: 241
POS: SF


Not an ideal set-up for the Sixers who were after Wiggins. But Parker gives the a terrific scoring option to pair with their young athletes in Michael Carter-Williams andNerlens Noel. Parker could average 20 PPG as a rookie in Philly. Look for Dante Exumto be a real possibility here, too. They could end up shopping Carter-Williams or just pairing the two together in the backcourt.
PLAYER CARD
4
Dante Exum
Orlando Magic (23 - 59)

COLLEGE: Australia
HT: 6-6
WT: 196
POS: PG


The Magic want a point guard and I think Exum would be a good long-term fit next toVictor Oladipo. Neither is a pure point guard and neither is a great shooter, but they offer length and the ability to get to the basket. Both still have a lot of room to improve. Marcus Smart is also a possibility here, though it might be a bit high.
PLAYER CARD
5
Noah Vonleh
Utah Jazz (25 - 57)

COLLEGE: Indiana
HT: 6-10
WT: 247
POS: PF


Jazz fans have to be devastated. They have zero shot of landing Jabari Parker here. And their other targets are all gone as well. They donâ??t really need another power forward, but at this point, thatâ??s the value left on the board. Vonlehâ??s ability to stretch the floor should be intriguing to the Jazz.
PLAYER CARD
6
Aaron Gordon
Boston Celtics (25 - 57)

COLLEGE: Arizona
HT: 6-9
WT: 220
POS: PF


The Celtics will likely shop this pick, though at No. 6 I am not sure exactly what they can get for it. They have been high on Gordon for a while, and I think this would be a very good fit for them. Offensively he is a bit raw, but I think his intangibles as a defender and energy guy will make up for a lot of that. He changes the game with his athleticism in ways that are hard to quantify.
PLAYER CARD
7
Julius Randle
Los Angeles Lakers (27 - 55)

COLLEGE: Kentucky
HT: 6-9
WT: 234
POS: PF


Look for the Lakers to start shopping this pick. If they had stayed in the top 3, they might have hung onto it, but at No. 6 the interest will be in trying to turn this pick and other assets into a veteran such as Kevin Love. If they keep the pick, they'll want a player who can come in and contribute from the start. Randle, along with Parker, might be the most NBA-ready freshman in the draft. With the Lakers' entire front line heading into free agency this summer (including Pau Gasol, Chris Kaman and Jordan Hill), L.A. is going to have a lot of needs up front.

PLAYER CARD
8
Marcus Smart
Sacramento Kings (28 - 54)

COLLEGE: Oklahoma State
HT: 6-3
WT: 227
POS: PG


The Kings are obsessed with analytics, and by just about every metric out there, Smart is one of the top three players in this draft. Smart fits a need on multiple levels for the Kings. Isaiah Thomas was good for the Kings this year, but ultimately they think he's a backup. Smart's size and basketball IQ are major upgrades at the position. But it's Smart's toughness, leadership, competitiveness and a desire to win at any cost that could transform the culture in Sacramento.

PLAYER CARD
9
Doug McDermott
Charlotte Hornets (43 - 39)

COLLEGE: Creighton
HT: 6-8
WT: 218
POS: SF


A very tough outcome for the Pistons who have to send this pick to the Hornets as part of the deal that shipped out Ben Gordon. Could McBuckets really go this high? Consider the situation. The Hornets desperately need shooting and scoring out of their small forward position. This might be a little high for McDermott, but his athletic numbers at the combine gave teams a little more leeway to take him this high and he is a good fit in Charlotte. The team is already loaded with athletes, they just need shooters with great basketball IQs. I think McDermott or Stauskas, either one, could end up here.
PLAYER CARD
10
Nik Stauskas
Philadelphia 76ers (19 - 63)

COLLEGE: Michigan
HT: 6-7
WT: 207
POS: SG


The Sixers addressed their frontcourt needs with their first pick, but they still need shooting. Stauskas is not only, arguably, the best shooter in the draft, but he has the ability to play both the one and the two, giving the Sixers a great 2 guard plus depth behind Carter-Williams.
PLAYER CARD
11
Gary Harris
Denver Nuggets (36 - 46)

COLLEGE: Michigan State
HT: 6-5
WT: 205
POS: SG


Randy Foye is coming off a career year, and they have Evan Fournier as a backup, but Harris is a potential upgrade over both players. Not only can he score from anywhere on the floor and play both the 1 and the 2, but he's one of the few lockdown defenders in the draft.

PLAYER CARD
12
Dario Saric
Orlando Magic (23 - 59)

COLLEGE: Croatia
HT: 6-10
WT: 223
POS: PF


This is Orlando's second lottery pick, so they can afford to gamble a little bit here. Saric's situation remains cloudy. Will he be coming to the NBA next season or is he staying in Europe for a few more years? If he can assure teams he is coming to the NBA next season, he could go this high orhigher.He is an amazing talent and with so many athletes on the roster already, getting someone as skilled as Saric to help facilitate things would be a terrific fit in Orlando.
PLAYER CARD
13
Adreian Payne
Minnesota Timberwolves (40 - 42)

COLLEGE: Michigan State
HT: 6-10
WT: 239
POS: PF


The Wolves are going to have to trade Kevin Love. He won't re-sign in Minnesota next season, which means they have to get something for him now or risk losing him for nothing next summer. So while perimeter shooting remains a must, they also will need help replacing Love in the frontcourt. The good news is that Payne offers something of both. Not only is he ready to step in and play in the paint from day one, but he's also a terrific shooter with NBA 3-point range who can really stretch the floor.

PLAYER CARD
14
Zach LaVine
Phoenix Suns (48 - 34)

COLLEGE: UCLA
HT: 6-6
WT: 181
POS: PG


The Suns already have two combo guards in their starting line with Goran Dragic and Eric Bledsoe, but I don't think they'll hesitate to pull the trigger on LaVine if he's on the board. He has as much upside as anyone in the draft. He gives them another lethal shooter and should find minutes given that the Suns' backcourt lacks any real depth at either the 1 or the 2.

PLAYER CARD


 

muzikfrk75

#4080
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,510
Reputation
1,300
Daps
25,850
Reppin
336
15
James Young
Atlanta Hawks (38 - 44)

COLLEGE: Kentucky
HT: 6-8
WT: 213
POS: SF


The Hawks have been looking for another wing, and Young has tremendous upside here. If he had shot the ball more consistently as a freshman, he would have been selected six to eight spots higher. Still scouts are convinced there's nothing wrong with his stroke and given a little more time, he could be a very effective defense stretcher.

PLAYER CARD
16
Tyler Ennis
Chicago Bulls (48 - 34)

COLLEGE: Syracuse
HT: 6-3
WT: 182
POS: PG


With Derrick Rose returning from his second ACL surgery and D.J. Augustin a free agent, the Bulls need a reliable point guard as Rose's backup. Ennis might be young, but he was among the steadiest point guards in the country and plays the sort of mistake free basketball the Bulls will want in a backup.

PLAYER CARD


17
P.J. Hairston
Boston Celtics (25 - 57)

COLLEGE: North Carolina
HT: 6-5
WT: 229
POS: SG


The Celtics need shooting. After shipping off Courtney Lee to Memphis, Avery Bradleyremains the Grizzlies' only reliable 3-point shooter. Not only can Hairston stroke it from deep, he has an NBA body and should be more NBA ready than the average prospect selected at No. 17 -- a big plus for the Celtics.

PLAYER CARD
18
Cleanthony Early
Phoenix Suns (48 - 34)

COLLEGE: Wichita State
HT: 6-7
WT: 210
POS: SF


If the Suns address backcourt depth with their first pick, I could see them trying to address their small forward issues with their second pick. Gerald Green gave them some good minutes last year, but with P.J. Tucker a free agent, they could use someone like Early. He can shoot, rebound and tested very well in the athletic drills at the NBA combine.

PLAYER CARD
19
Rodney Hood
Chicago Bulls (48 - 34)

COLLEGE: Duke
HT: 6-9
WT: 208
POS: SG


The Bulls need shooting in the worst way, and Hood shot a red-hot 42 percent from 3 this season. He has elite size for his position and has the maturity to step in and play meaningful minutes for the Bulls from day one. While the Bulls still have some front court issues to address, this draft really should shore up their backcourt challenges.

PLAYER CARD
20
Elfrid Payton
Toronto Raptors (48 - 34)

COLLEGE: Louisiana Lafayette
HT: 6-4
WT: 185
POS: PG


Both Kyle Lowry and Greivis Vasquez are free agents this summer. While the Raptors would like to sign them both, Payton offers them some important insurance. In fact, even as a prospect he's probably a better than Vasquez from day one. Payton is the biggest sleeper in the draft. With his length, athleticism and defense I could see him going significantly higher than this, but I don't think he gets past Toronto if he's still on the board.

PLAYER CARD
21
Jusuf Nurkic
Oklahoma City Thunder (59 - 23)

COLLEGE: Bosnia
HT: 6-11
WT: 280
POS: C


Nurkic has NBA size and soft hands to play the center position and let's face it, in a draft devoid of bigs, that's a commodity. His lack of elite athleticism and some conditioning issues probably keep him from going higher, but this is a nice draft-and-stash candidate for the Thunder.

PLAYER CARD
22
Jerami Grant
Memphis Grizzlies (50 - 32)

COLLEGE: Syracuse
HT: 6-8
WT: 214
POS: SF


The Grizzlies could use help at the 3, and Grant gives them a combo forward with elite athletic ability and length. His lack of a real jump shot keeps him from going higher, but the defensive toughness he brings to the table should really help the Grizzlies.

PLAYER CARD
23
K.J. McDaniels
Utah Jazz (25 - 57)

COLLEGE: Clemson
HT: 6-6
WT: 195
POS: SF


McDaniels gives the Jazz an athletic forward who should bring defensive toughness right away. Many scouts feel he's one of the more underrated players in the draft -- someone who's a jump shot away from being a dominant wing.
 

muzikfrk75

#4080
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,510
Reputation
1,300
Daps
25,850
Reppin
336
PLAYER CARD
24
T.J. Warren
Charlotte Hornets (43 - 39)

COLLEGE: NC State
HT: 6-8
WT: 220
POS: SF


There's a run on wings! Warren is the best scorer of the lot -- a player who looks for and can get his shot from anywhere on the floor. Given the Bobcats' scoring issues at the 3 (Michael Kidd-Gilchrist may be a great defender, but he's struggled to find his offense) Warren is a great fit here. His lack of a 3-point shot is the only thing holding him back from going higher.

PLAYER CARD
25
Kristaps Porzingis
Houston Rockets (54 - 28)

COLLEGE: Latvia
HT: 6-11
WT: 220
POS: PF


Iâ??m not sure if Porzingis will stay in the draft. He could go in the lottery if he waits until 2015. But if he stays in the draft the Rockets will be tempted. They donâ??t need rookies right now and in a few years he could be a valuable piece on their front line.
PLAYER CARD
26
Shabazz Napier
Miami Heat (54 - 28)

COLLEGE: Connecticut
HT: 6-1
WT: 175
POS: PG


Mario Chalmers is an unrestricted free agent and it's unclear whether the Heat will be able to afford to pay him. Norris Cole is also hitting free agency this summer and the Heat could use a veteran guard who knows how to play in big games. Napier could be a Chalmers-like player for them down the road.

PLAYER CARD
27
Clint Capela
Phoenix Suns (48 - 34)

COLLEGE: Switzerland
HT: 6-11
WT: 222
POS: PF


Capela's stock has slipped a bit since a mediocre showing at the Nike Hoop Summit but he still has elite length and athletic ability and is another player who could be valuable in a few years as a draft-and-stash candidate. Given that the Suns have three first-round picks, it makes sense for at least one of them to be international player.

PLAYER CARD
28
Kyle Anderson
Los Angeles Clippers (57 - 25)

COLLEGE: UCLA
HT: 6-9
WT: 230
POS: PF


Anderson plays like a point guard, but he has the body of a NBA power forward. The Clippers have the best point guard in the game in Chris Paul, but Paul could use some help with Darren Collison heading to free agency. I think Doc Rivers might be the perfect coach to get the most out of Anderson's talents.

PLAYER CARD
29
C.J. Wilcox
Oklahoma City Thunder (59 - 23)

COLLEGE: Washington
HT: 6-5
WT: 200
POS: SG


The Thunder could always use more shooting and Wilcox is another lights out shooter. He's got the size and athleticism to play the 2, but his age has caused his stock to fall. I think this would be a nice late pickup for the Thunder.

PLAYER CARD
30
Mitch McGary
San Antonio Spurs (62 - 20)

COLLEGE: Michigan
HT: 6-10
WT: 250
POS: PF


With the possibility of Tim Duncan retiring, the Spurs are going to need some help in the paint. Had McGary not hurt his back this fall, he wouldâ??ve been a like lottery pick. If everything checks out OK, this could be another DeJuan Blair type get for them.
PLAYER CARD
 
Top