Essential The Official ESPN Insider Thread (ESPN+)

Skooby

Alone In My Zone
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
25,162
Reputation
10,242
Daps
59,702
Reppin
The Cosmos
Scout's take: ESPN 100 SG Kwe Parker picks Rutgers

ESPN 100 shooting guard Kwe Parker ended his recruiting on Sunday via his Twitter account by committing to head coach Eddie Jordan and the Rutgers Scarlet Knights after also considering Boston College, Clemson, Virginia Tech and Wake Forest.

Let's take a look at what type of player is headed to Rutgers.Why he committed: The four star Parker had a great visit and really connected with coach Eddie Jordan. Parker also feels he has a opportunity to play immediately and that the Scarlet Knights are up and coming in the highly competitive Big Ten Conference.

What he brings: Parker is a highlight on the break with his tremendous athleticism. He attacks downhill and can make plays in the air like a ballerina with his great explosion and body control. He finishes over taller defenders with ease. He is an improved shooter and a top notch on ball defender. Parker is simply a high level play maker.

How he fits: Parker immediately makes the Scarlet Knights' fast break a huge weapon. In the halfcourt set he is in attack mode off the dribble and expect Jordan to set up some isolation with his NBA coaching background. Parker will be worth his weight in gold on the defensive end as well. He has the toughness and athleticism to defend both guard positions.

Who he reminds us of: Parker reminds us of former Jacksonville and NBA slam dunk champion Dee Brown with his attacking mentality and off the charts athleticism.

How the class is shaping up: Parker is the first pledge for the Scarlet Knights in the class of 2016.
 

Skooby

Alone In My Zone
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
25,162
Reputation
10,242
Daps
59,702
Reppin
The Cosmos
Like Valanciunas, Kidd-Gilchrist deal surprising low and he's OK with it

For the second time in a week, an NBA player entering the fourth and final year of his rookie contract has reportedly agreed to an extension.

And just like Jonas Valanciunas' four-year extension with the Toronto Raptors announced last week, the amount Michael Kidd-Gilchrist will reportedly get from the Charlotte Hornets -- $52 million over four years, as first reported by Yahoo! Sports -- is surprisingly low.

Fans often want analysts to assess whether a player has made a mistake in signing a contract. I can't say that because I don't know how much Kidd-Gilchrist values playing in Charlotte, how important security is to him or even if he was OK taking less money to help the Hornets fill out their roster.

What I can speak to is whether Kidd-Gilchrist maximized his earnings potential, and the answer to that seems to be a resounding no.



Valuing Kidd-Gilchrist


As with Valanciunas, it's necessary to move past the box score to understand how valuable Kidd-Gilchrist has been and will be over the four seasons covered by his extension (2016-17 through 2019-20, when he'll be 26 at the conclusion of this deal). Last season was the first time Kidd-Gilchrist averaged double-figure scoring, and then just barely -- 10.9 points per game.

While Kidd-Gilchrist dramatically improved the mechanics of his jumper last season, and got better results from midrange, he was still one of the league's weaker offensive perimeter starters. Kidd-Gilchrist neither made nor attempted a 3-pointer all season, a remarkable feat for a starting small forward in this 3-happy age. Without those efficient looks, Kidd-Gilchrist rated lower than league average in both usage rate (using 18.4 percent of Charlotte's plays) and true shooting percentage (.519).

And yet Kidd-Gilchrist still ranked 10th among small forwards in ESPN's real plus-minus (RPM), a hair behind Carmelo Anthony of the New York Knicks. In terms of defensive RPM, Kidd-Gilchrist raked fourth at his position behind three members of the NBA's All-Defensive first team.

Kidd-Gilchrist's RPM doesn't seem to be the product of statistical noise. He has always had a strong defensive reputation, the primary reason he was drafted second overall behind Kentucky teammate Anthony Davis in 2012. And Kidd-Gilchrist ranked 15th in All-Defensive voting, good enough to be part of a mythical third team. (I went a bit further, picking Kidd-Gilchrist to my All-Defensive second team.)

Over the past two seasons, the time Kidd-Gilchrist has missed because of injuries has revealed his value to the team. In 2013-14, according to NBA.com/Stats, the Hornets' defensive rating slipped slightly below league average during the 19 games Kidd-Gilchrist missed with a fractured bone in his left hand. For the year, Charlotte finished with the league's sixth-best defensive rating. Last season, the Hornets were ninth overall in points allowed per 100 possessions but a dismal 27th in the 12 games Kidd-Gilchrist missed in November and December with a stress reaction in his foot.

Charlotte has gone 62-55 (.530) with Kidd-Gilchrist in the lineup the past two seasons and 14-33 (.298) when he has been unavailable to play.

Given that stat, it should be no surprise that projections based on age (Kidd-Gilchrist won't turn 22 for a month), RPM and my box-score-based wins above replacement player stat (where Kidd-Gilchrist inevitable rated more modestly, with 1.4 WARP last season) show his value at more than $40 million over the first two seasons of his extension, during which he'll make approximately $24.25 million, assuming standard 7.5 percent year-to-year raises (2016-17 and 2017-18 salaries based on reported extension and standard raises).




Extensions favoring teams so far


Given Kidd-Gilchrist's value, the Hornets have to be thrilled to lock him up for less than 60 percent of the projected maximum four-year offer sheet worth approximately $90 million he could have received next summer as a restricted free agent. One concern for many teams in extending players this fall is that it might increase the cap space they take up next summer. That won't be the case with Kidd-Gilchrist, whose cap hold as a free agent ($12.7 million) would actually have been larger than his likely salary in the first year of the extension ($11.7 million).

Unlike Valanciunas, who wanted to get a deal done before playing for the Lithuanian national team in EuroBasket, Kidd-Gilchrist didn't necessarily face any pressure to sign a contract now. The timing is unusual. As former Brooklyn Nets executive Bobby Marksnoted on Twitter, before this year just three players had signed rookie extensions in August since 2006. It's hard not to believe Kidd-Gilchrist couldn't have gotten a similar or better deal closer to the Nov. 2 deadline for extensions to rookie contracts.

Paradoxically, each unexpectedly low deal we see gives other extension-eligible players more incentive to wait for restricted free agency. Not only have the Valanciunas and Kidd-Gilchrist deals set the market relatively low for extensions, they also reduce the number of contenders for the pile of cash teams will have available to spend next summer. Having them off the market means it's more likely that a desperate team throws a max offer at a player like Harrison Barnes of the Golden State Warriors.

So we'll wait and see how many other players sign rookie extensions between now and Nov. 2. Perhaps Valanciunas and Kidd-Gilchrist are just outliers who value security more than their risk-taking peers. So far, however, their extensions suggest that players are undervaluing their own worth on the market.
 

Skooby

Alone In My Zone
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
25,162
Reputation
10,242
Daps
59,702
Reppin
The Cosmos

Scout's Take: ESPN 100 center Isaac Humphries to Kentucky

Rumor became reality on Wednesday morning when Isaac Humphries' reclassification to the Class of 2015 -- and subsequent commitment to Kentucky -- became official. He’s now expected to be in Lexington this weekend and on campus for the beginning of classes next week. Why he committed: Humphries arrived at La Lumiere School in Indiana in January, initially intending to spend a year and a half in the high school ranks, but reportedly began considering an immediate jump to college shortly thereafter. At about the same time, Kentucky missed out on several of the five-star prospects it had been targeting in the 2015 class, and thus started to get creative on the recruiting front. Jamal Murray, a scoring guard from Canada who also reclassified up from the 2016 class, was the big prize, but solidifying the depth of their front line remained the final hurdle for John Calipari and his staff.

What Humphries brings: He’s a true center who isn’t necessarily the type of mobile, high-flying athlete Kentucky fans have become accustomed to, but is very skilled and still just 17 years old. In fact, because he won’t turn 18 until midway through next season, NBA rules will preclude him from declaring for the draft until 2017, so he is expected to be in a Wildcats uniform for at least two seasons. Physically, Humphries has a big frame, and while it still needs to be cut up and defined, it’s tailor-made to bang in the post and take up space in the lane. He has great touch, both with short jumpers around the paint but also stepping out to 15 to 18 feet, and is a very good passer, so he’s capable of playing alongside another big body as well.

How the class is shaping up: With another mass exodus for the NBA following last season, Calipari definitely had to get creative to build his six-man class. Skal Labissiere is obviously the star of the class and is an almost certain high-lottery pick in 2016. Humphries provides not just a suitable backup and capable running mate in the event Kentucky wants to play big, but also is an added insurance policy along the front line. Murray and Isaiah Briscoe will be the most immediate impact guards and Charles Matthews will be a big utility player on the perimeter, capable of patching a variety of holes. Mychal Mulder, a 3-point sniper out of the junior college ranks, rounds out the class.

How he fits: The short-term fit for Humphries depends almost entirely on how Calipari elects to play next year, but the bottom line is he now has flexibility. With Alex Poythress, Marcus Lee and Derek Willis all returning to join Labissiere and Humphries along the front line, Calipari could elect to go big with three-man combinations on the floor at any time, or he could go smaller and utilize more three-guard lineups with Tyler Ulis, Murray and Briscoe all on the floor together. Most importantly, though, there’s now depth at all five positions on the floor. so the Wildcats are protected against injuries or anything else unexpected that would affect their lineup.

Who he reminds us of: With his big body, Australian roots, good hands and feet around the basket and consistent mid-range shooting touch, it’s hard not to at least consider the comparison to Luc Longley, a center whose ability to make those mid-range shots used to open up the lane for the likes of Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen to attack the rim or post up during the Bulls' second three-peat.



Scout's Take: ESPN 100 PF Sacha Killeya-Jones to Kentucky

Four-star power forward Sacha Killeya-Jones has committed to coach John Calipari and the Kentucky Wildcats after also considering Virginia, California, Florida, Connecticut, Georgetown, Wake Forest and North Carolina.

Let's take a look at what Killeya-Jones, who is No. 56 in the ESPN 100 but expected to rise when next week's rankings are revealed, will bring to Big Blue Nation.

Why he committed: "I know going to play for Coach Cal at Kentucky means I will be playing against great players in practice," Killeya-Jones said. "That's what I was looking for, because it will help me develop as a player and prepare me for the games. I know I have to earn my playing time."

What he brings: Killeya-Jones is a long and lean power forward who is a very good athlete. He is extremely mobile and possesses an excellent skill package. Killeya-Jones can score inside with excellent touch, feel and body control for his size and can stretch the defense out to the arc where he can shoot over smaller defenders with ease. He also is a good ball handler and short, straight line-driver to the rim and a pretty good rebounder as well. Killeya-Jones runs the floor extremely well and plays with good energy and urgency, not to mention his tremendous upside.

How he fits: Killeya-Jones will provide an immediate threat on the offensive end of the floor. He can finish on the break and is the type of player Calipari can run a set play for within the half-court set -- especially in pick-and-pop and pick-and-roll situations. Killeya-Jones will also be extremely effective in the high post, where he will have the option to hit the open 15-to-17 foot jumper, pass to an open teammate in the low post or take matters into his own hands and attack the rim with a quick one- or two-rhythm dribble drive down the lane. Killeya-Jones will be a true matchup problem at the power forward position.

Who he reminds us of: Killeya-Jones' length, skill and upside brings to mind a cross between NBA power forwards Channing Frye and Adreian Payne. In addition to having excellent skills, all three players are mobile, and difficult matchups at their position.

How the class is shaping up: Killeya-Jones joins 6-10 center Tai Wynyard from Auckland, New Zealand, to provide the Wildcats with immediate frontcourt help in the scoring and rebounding departments. (Wynyard could reportedly play the second half of the 2015-16 season.)
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
96
Reputation
30
Daps
172
McShay: 2016 Mock Draft
Here's a way-too-early mock of how next year's first round might unfold, and it starts off with quarterbacks.
McShay

It would be much appreciated
 

Skooby

Alone In My Zone
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
25,162
Reputation
10,242
Daps
59,702
Reppin
The Cosmos
ESPN 100: Where would we have ranked Thon Maker?

Thon Maker held the No. 1 spot in the ESPN 60 coming out of the 2013-14 season at Carlisle High School in Martinsville, Virginia, when he subsequently transferred to Orangeville Prep in Ontario, Canada. Maker's transfer north of the border took him out of consideration for our rankings, as we only rank prospects who play high school basketball in the United States. Our policy was devised because of the difficulty of evaluating international players -- we don’t feel it provides an accurate service to our readers to evaluate players we may not have seen. With an increasing number of international players participating on the AAU circuit -- Maker, Kentucky commit Jamal Murray and UNLV commit Justin Jackson (who will transfer from Findlay Prep and play high school basketball in Canada next year, he told ESPN last week) among them -- it's a policy we may revisit.

In Maker's case, we've seen him in plenty of high-level events, and his residence in Canada does not prevent us from giving him a grade, an evaluation and covering his progress. If a decision about ranking him had to take place, it would be heavily debated.

The class of 2016 is loaded with star power, star depth and overall depth -- there is no truly weak position in the class.

What Harry Giles (No. 1) has done coming off ACL, MCL and meniscus surgery is amazing. He has been on a mission, and dominating against the best on every stage. The next step for Giles is to really work for his position above the block, and to become dependable scoring above the block with a move. Right now, he scores inside with power and touch.

Jayson Tatum (No. 2) has separated himself as the most efficient scorer in the game, a high-percentage player inside the arc who demonstrates his skill effectively from the mid-post, pinch post, and nailing face-up jumpers along with being a trustworthy free throw shooter. When he extends his shooting range he becomes even more potent and dangerous.

Josh Jackson (No. 3) is a fierce competitor who is playing at a high level at both ends of the floor, and thrives in the transition game. When Jackson's skill set and shot begin to match his athletic ability, he'll go to a different level.

Dennis Smith Jr. (No. 4) can take over a game in a moment’s notice, while Malik Monk (No. 5) is the most dynamic pure bucket producer in the game.

There were no changes in the top five of the ESPN 100 because the above players have a combination of elite talent, outstanding athletic ability, skill, and basketball IQ to go along with a highly competitive spirit.

Maker, meanwhile, is a unique prospect because of his length, skill, and traits. He owns the size of a center -- 7-1 with a 7-3 wingspan, combined with the mobility and agility of a power forward, and the skill level of a small forward. He's put together some high-level performances against top competition, and his productivity touches many different categories from scoring to rebounds to blocked shots. Back in June he was named MVP of the NBA camp, and more recently was MVP at the Basketball Without Borders event in the Dominican Republic.

Maker's areas of growth are obvious. Even though he has increased his weight, he must continue to add strength, bulk and muscle. He's a very good vertical athlete, but needs to learn to play with a lower base more often on both ends of the floor, so he can compete with leverage. Maker is a coachable player and a dedicated worker, so improvements will happen over time, which is all part of what makes him special.

Similar to Jackson, Maker is already 18 and will turn 19 this season. That's a factor when evaluating players in terms of NBA draft potential -- a younger prospect with equal talent will have more time to grow and develop.

With everything we know, if we were to rank Maker we would consider him one of four No. 1 types in the class, similar to 2013 when we had Andrew Wiggins, Jabari Parker, Julius Randle and Aaron Gordon at the top. As of today, Maker would sit at No. 4 behind Giles, Tatum, and Jackson, though it would be a close call -- and a fluid debate for the future.

Biggest risers, fallers in latest ESPN 60 rankings

Trevon Duval and Billy Preston had already carved out sterling reputations as top 20 players in the ESPN 60, but based on their work this summer, that duo may be the most notable risers in the class of 2017. Duval now finds himself ranked as the fourth-best prospect and number one overall point guard in his class, while Preston moved from No. 20 all the way to No. 6.

Attacking off the dribble has become commonplace for just about every top guard in the country, but few if any do it with quite the same combination of speed, quickness, power and athleticism that Duval displays. His ability to accelerate, burst right through contact and attack with sheer force is second to none. He’s as explosive going through the air as he is on the ground and when you combine that with the ability to make sharp changes of direction with his handle, and his impressive floor vision, you get the best playmaking guard in the country.

Preston's physical tools immediately jump out at you along with his long and powerful 6-foot-9 physique, but he’s also highly skilled for his size. His handle was his first weapon, and his ability to attack off the dribble at his age and size made him especially unique, but we’ve also seen his jumper start to come along now as well. As Preston continues to polish that skill set, while also learning to utilize his physical tools to the best of his ability inside the paint, he has the potential to be the biggest mismatch problem in the class.

Duval and Preston weren't the only prospects to make a jump up the ESPN 60 rankings, though. Here’s a look at others who gained major ground over the summer months:

Ikey Obiagu, No. 10 (previously No. 18), C, 6-11, 240, Greenforest Christian/Decatur, GA

In virtually any other AAU program in the country, Obiagu would have been playing at the U17 level. But for the Georgia Stars, who boast seemingly the deepest collection of high-major frontcourt prospects on the AAU circcit, Obiagu headlined their 16-and-under squad, where he’s an absolute man among boys. Already physically dominant with his powerful 7-foot frame and complementary high motor, Obiagu is an elite rim protector and physical presence inside the lane who needs to continue to develop his offensive game to keep rising on this list.

Hamidou Diallo, No. 11 (previously No. 30), SG, 6-4, 185, Science Academy/Putnam, CT

Diallo may be older for his class (he turned 17 in July), but he hasn’t just continued to improve, he’s continued to grow as well. Now what you have is a 6-4 two-guard who is super smooth, very athletic, a natural playmaker and much-improved shooter. Considering he was a virtual unknown just 15 months ago, and the areas of his game that could still stand to improve, maintaining this same rate of improvement will give Diallo a chance to finish as one of the top scoring guards in the class.

D.J. Harvey Jr., No. 12 (previously No. 17), SF, 6-5, 190, DeMatha Catholic/Hyattsville, MD

Harvey’s been a well-known prospect since the moment he entered the high school ranks -- and he’s been nationally ranked since that time as well -- but there’s no denying he’s made strides to his game of late, and both his recruitment and his ranking have risen as a consequence. Harvey's mid-range pull-up has developed into a true weapon, his three-point range become much more consistent and his athleticism has started to come out more in a halfcourt game.

Kevin Knox, No. 16 (previously No. 45), SF, 6-6, 190, Catholic/Tampa, FL

Knox won a gold medal with the USA Basketball 16-and-under squad and followed that up with a strong showing at the Nike Peach Jam. His combination of length, athleticism, skill and versatility makes him one of the toughest budding mismatches in the class. What's equally intriguing is that while Knox has been coming on strong in recent months, he’s still only 15 years old and recently gave up football to concentrate on basketball year-round, so the best is still yet to come.

Brandon McCoy, No. 17 (previously unranked), C, 7-0, 230, Morse/San Diego, CA

Of the 10 first-timers to crack the ESPN 60, no one is making a bigger splash than McCoy, who debuts in the 17th spot. First and foremost, there’s an obviously high physical upside with his size, frame and athleticism. McCoy has a motor in the way he changes ends and is active on the glass, but there’s also an element of budding skill to make him more than just a physically gifted hard-worker. McCoy owns a soft touch, both facing the basket and playing with his back to it, as well as some developing footwork on the block.

As for the fallers, there are certainly some who haven’t evolved as we had hoped, whether physically or from a skill standpoint, and others whose lack of efficiency (more so than natural talent) has cost them. Of the 10 prospects who fell out of the rankings, nine were ranked in the last 16 spots of the previous ESPN 60, so it really had more to do with the discovery or development of new talent than it did them falling off.
 

Skooby

Alone In My Zone
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
25,162
Reputation
10,242
Daps
59,702
Reppin
The Cosmos
Using Hall of Famer comparisons, what Kobe's last season might look like

By the time the NBA playoffs roll around next spring, it will have been nearly four years since Kobe Bryant suited up for a playoff game.

It will be approaching six years since he won his fifth championship ring with the Los Angeles Lakers. He has finished the last three seasons on the sidelines. With his contract expiring and his NBA experience meter about to click over to 20 years, it's fair to wonder whether this will be it for one of the game's greatest players. Bryant has hinted in the past that this season might be it, though he's left enough wiggle room for the rest of us to speculate.

We were posed this question in the Summer Forecast, and 56 percent of voters decided that Bryant will play on after this season. In reality, no one really knows, and perhaps Bryant himself doesn't know, either.

There's plenty to write regarding the basketball aspect of this. How will Bryant's presence help or hurt the Lakers' growing gaggle of young players? Is he shooting too much? (The eternal question with Bryant.) Can the Lakers afford to commit future cap space to him when they are trying so hard to build the right way and attract an in-his-prime superstar? But today, I want to focus on the historical aspect of this possibly being Kobe Bryant's last stand. Given the physical woes of his last three seasons, what would a successful farewell look like?

For Bryant, his final season, whenever it is, will be his one chance to create a favorable last impression for fans and young players alike. He enters the 2015-16 season facing enormous challenges. His Lakers are coming off their worst-ever season. He's played 41 games total the last two seasons. When he did play last season, he averaged 22.3 points in 35 games. But he also put up an astronomical 35 percent usage rate and finished in the 12th percentile of effective field goal percentage. With Bryant as the primary option of the Lakers' offense, L.A. barely reached a point per possession while he was on the floor. Is putting up an empty scoring average for a bad team really a fitting swan song for a five-time champion? In the end, the answer to that is really up to Bryant and his body's ability to hold up for a full season.

Bryant just turned 37, and two decades of professional basketball take a toll, as we've seen the last couple of years. We shouldn't expect Bryant to suddenly turn the clock back a decade and put up 35 points per game. It would be fun if it happened, but it's not realistic.

So just how should we establish our expectations for Bryant's just-might-be last season? For that, we can scroll through the final outcomes for Bryant's true peers: the upper-tier Hall of Famers from the NBA's history books. We'll rank the scenarios from worst to best.

The Steve Nash Scenario
This one is fresh in our minds, and of course Bryant got to see Nash's decline up close. Nash was injured, tried for more than one season to outwork the disintegration of his body, and ultimately was unable to do so. He ended up as an expiring contract and a placeholder for cap space.

There was nothing undignified about it -- Nash did everything he could to get back for one more quality run. It just didn't happen.

Nevertheless, we have to admit that this is the worst-case scenario for a Bryant swan song: He simply isn't able to stay on the court because his body won't cooperate.



The Michael Jordan Scenario I
We're talking Wizards-era Jordan here. I am not in the camp of those who think Jordan's Washington coda detracts from his overall legacy, and I think that now, 12 years removed, we can see that it really doesn't. I know that I was thrilled to get to see Jordan play out the string, just as I'm hoping to have the chance to do so over the next season or two with Bryant. We get these legends for only so long, and every chance to savor their skills should be appreciated for what it is. Jordan was nowhere near his Bulls-era self, either in terms of athleticism or productivity.

Nevertheless, what he did at ages 38 and 39 was pretty amazing. He averaged 20 points at age 39, down from 21.2 the season before. He did this after being away from the game for three years. But the analyst in me knows those scoring averages were largely hollow, as Jordan's percentages were well below average. And the bottom line is that he wasn't able to get the Wizards into the playoffs. I see this as the most likely outcome for Bryant, if even a little optimistic. A superficially OK-ish scoring average, low efficiency, with a few sparkling games sprinkled into the mix to remind us of what once was. But no return to the playoffs.



The Larry Bird Scenario
This one is a mix of the first two scenarios and a rosier one. Bird was still a very good player during his final season with the Celtics. Unfortunately, Bird's ongoing back issues limited him to 45 games and pushed him into early retirement.

But those 45 games were enough to give us some great last-season memories of Bird's greatness. On March 15 of that season, he put up 49 points, 14 rebounds and 12 assists in a double-overtime win over a Portland team that eventually made the NBA Finals. Boston made the playoffs and lost a first-round series during which Bird had limited availability. But in the one game the Celtics won, Bird had 16 points, six rebounds and 14 assists. If Bryant can't get all the way back physically, is it too much to ask for one or two more vintage 50-point outbursts, perhaps one of them punctuated by a buzzer-beater?



The Miller, Stockton and Havlicek Scenarios
These are the dignified farewells. Hall of Famers who we kind of figured were playing their last seasons (we knew it was the case for John Havlicek), who weren't at peak levels but still effectively went about doing the things they'd always done. Reggie Miller averaged 14.8 points in 66 games, and then scored 27 on 16 shots in the last game of a second-round playoff loss that ended his career. John Stockton played and started every Jazz game for the 12th time in his previous 13 years and led the league in assist rate as Utah made the playoffs.

Havlicek averaged 16.1 points in 82 games for a Celtics dynasty two seasons removed from another championship, and one year away from Bird's arrival. In his final game, Havlicek put up 29 points and eight assists, and received aseven-minute standing ovation at Boston Garden. Boston was bad that season, but that last image of Havlicek is indelible. These three players, like Bryant, spent their entire careers with a single franchise, and if Bryant's last season is like any of these, that's a great outcome.



The Wilt and Russell Scenarios
Now we get into the realm of fantasy. Wilt Chamberlain put up the greatest individual final season in history, averaging 13.2 points and a league-best 18.6 rebounds. He also played 43 minutes per game at age 36 and shot 72.7 percent from the floor as the Lakers advanced to the Finals.

Bill Russell played and coached the Celtics to the 11th championship of his 13-year career. If Bryant were to have a Bryant-like season, and did so in the service of high-level winning, that would be a season we'd never forget. Then he'd have to walk away, right? Alas, this is not going to happen.



The Michael Jordan Scenario II
Which brings us to the ending that so many thought Jordan should have stuck with. He was still the best player in the game, paced the NBA in scoring, and not only led the Bulls to a sixth title but also hit the game-winning shot to make it happen. Unfortunately, even if Bryant were to magically get back to his pre-injury level of play, this scenario won't happen, either. The Lakers just don't have the talent or experience.

But, to paraphrase Hemingway, isn't it pretty to think of this happening? In any event, the Jordan sagas tell us a couple of things. First of all, most players, even great ones, seem less concerned with their own histories than the rest of us. And Bryant doesn't need this kind of storybook finish to cement his legacy. He just needs to stay on the floor and play to win. The rest will take care of itself.
 
Top