Remove the "?s=20" from the url.
Remove the "?s=20" from the url.
Another funny one is the Dayton, OH guy affiliated w/ OSU that has them ranked #7, although that might actually be a solid ranking for what we've seen from OSU thus far. This weekend will determine if they're top 5 or nahGoddamn, there are some REALLY bad votes and it doesn't even seem to match team affiliation so far as I can tell. They're just awful voters.
Tennessee's only wins are against Austin Peay and a terrible 0-3 Virginia squad, they just lost by double-digits to a Florida team that looked like dogshyt the first two weeks....and two voters have them in the top-15.
My point in bringing up TCU is to show how got to playoff despite all the SEC bias that you claim is out there
TCU wasn’t one of the best teams last year and neither was Michigan “1 game schedule”
Or maybe we shouldn’t have played against the LSU and UT of the world on the roadThey were 12-1 and with better wins than any other contender, how would they NOT get in?
The fact that Alabama was even a consideration despite being 10-2 with no top-20 wins is a fukking joke.
It's impossible to know who the "best" teams are, when so many schools (especially the SEC) are playing joke OOC schedules. That creates zero basis for comparison. Since it's impossible to objectively know who the best team is, all you can do is give it to the most deserving team.
* If Alabama wanted to be the most deserving team, then maybe they shouldn't have scheduled Utah State, UL Monroe, and Austin Peay
* If Alabama wanted to be the most deserving team, then maybe they should have won a single game against a top-20 squad
* If Alabama wanted to be the most deserving team, then maybe they should have won more than 3 road games all year
If 3/4 of your OOC schedule was home cupcakes, you go 3-2 on the road for the season, and you haven't beaten a single meaningful squad, then don't bytch when you finish the season on the outside looking in.
They were 12-1 and with better wins than any other contender, how would they NOT get in?
The fact that Alabama was even a consideration despite being 10-2 with no top-20 wins is a fukking joke.
It's impossible to know who the "best" teams are, when so many schools (especially the SEC) are playing joke OOC schedules. That creates zero basis for comparison. Since it's impossible to objectively know who the best team is, all you can do is give it to the most deserving team.
* If Alabama wanted to be the most deserving team, then maybe they shouldn't have scheduled Utah State, UL Monroe, and Austin Peay
* If Alabama wanted to be the most deserving team, then maybe they should have won a single game against a top-20 squad
* If Alabama wanted to be the most deserving team, then maybe they should have won more than 3 road games all year
If 3/4 of your OOC schedule was home cupcakes, you go 3-2 on the road for the season, and you haven't beaten a single meaningful squad, then don't bytch when you finish the season on the outside looking in.
TCU wasn’t one of the best teams last year and neither was Michigan “1 game schedule”
Or maybe we shouldn’t have played against the LSU and UT of the world on the road
Maybe if we played the Michigan or TCU schedule we would’ve had the resume.
While I will say Bama was better than the record indicated, it's complete fallacy to discredit someone b/c their team isn't better than X team (if that's what you're trying to do). If buddy roots for a D3 perennial loser, it doesn't mean that his argument is invalid.Who’s your team?
You’re criticizing Alabama OOC even tho we played At Texas and propping up Michigan’s “1 game schedule”Michigan had 6 wins over 8-win teams including beating #3 Ohio State by 45-23 and #7 Penn State by 41-17.
If Michigan was a "1-game schedule", then what the fukk was Alabama? A zero-game schedule?
You're so fukking illogical whenever Alabama is involved.
Ohio State and Penn State were both better than the squads that beat you.
While I will say Bama was better than the record indicated, it's complete fallacy to discredit someone b/c their team isn't better than X team (if that's what you're trying to do). If buddy roots for a D3 perennial loser, it doesn't mean that his argument is invalid.
It’s also a fallacy to push a narrative that Bama was overrated when they didn’t make the playoffs because of their resume and that’s what @Rhakim is doingWhile I will say Bama was better than the record indicated, it's complete fallacy to discredit someone b/c their team isn't better than X team (if that's what you're trying to do). If buddy roots for a D3 perennial loser, it doesn't mean that his argument is invalid.
It’s the schedule thing, why is it that we get shytted on for schedule G5 and FCS teams when nearly everybody else does it?