Tarantino Says Marvel actors aren’t movie stars: ‘Captain America Is the Star,’ Not Chris Evans

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
64,513
Reputation
13,765
Daps
263,367
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
Look at all this star power in a non MCU movie just to flop in 2022. He would have a point if they were cranking out legit competition with these "real movies".
Amsterdam-Poster.jpg
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
183,059
Reputation
23,523
Daps
595,910
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
In 2022, almost 2023, the movie star is nearly extinct.

The days of people packing out theaters to see a movie solely because a specific actor is leading it are pretty much over. Social media and streaming changed the game.

Tom Cruise says hi. Top Gun or mission impossible starring Chris Evans or hemsworth would go double wood :mjlol:
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
183,059
Reputation
23,523
Daps
595,910
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
Also... QT is a bigger star than these actors.. People don't realize his movies have a small or modest budget. They are very profitable.

The average coli poster doesn't realize that profit > gross B.O. Dumbasses :mjlol:
 

dr. pill biden

All Star
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
1,136
Reputation
98
Daps
2,709
i can’t even think of movies benedict cumberbact and scarlet johanssen were in before the MCU and they were legit stars in their own right :jbhmm:

but he’s right…it aint about the actor its about the characters that will be in the movie. just like batman been played by 17 nikkaz. shyt the hulk already been played by 3, 4. there are no movie stars left unless these shytty stars like chris evans stack their bread long enough to stop having to work for money and can start doing their own thing like denzel and bobby deniro
 

semicko82

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
31,359
Reputation
5,394
Daps
90,692
Reppin
NULL
Look at all this star power in a non MCU movie just to flop in 2022. He would have a point if they were cranking out legit competition with these "real movies".
Amsterdam-Poster.jpg
Huh
That's not even the point they made
 

jwinfield

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,403
Reputation
8,651
Daps
201,840
Reppin
NULL
I agree, but thats a good thing imo. Hate when a story is catered too heavily around the actors and not the characters
Fox made this mistake with Jennifer Lawerance as mystique.
That's not what he's arguing though.
Depends

Sam Jackson > Nick Fury
Robert Downy > Ironman
Spiderman > Tom Holland
How did Doolittle do?
But even then, the actual actors of the MCU have become household names.
Have they? And what good is being a household name if they're in a movie outside of MCU and no one gives a fukk about it.
People aint in the mood nowadays for some depressing ass Tarantino or Scorsese movie, mfs need hope lmfao.
QT's last movie made $377M.
They were stars before those movies. On top of that. Alot of their other movies don't do well. Chadwick and Reynolds may be the only ones on that list who can generate outside of their marvel characters. Maybe Hugh.
Someone mentioned 21 Bridges not really doing well at the box office, same with Marshall.
Marvel made me a fan of RDJ, Chris Evans, Hemsworth, even Chad Boseman. I also became a fan of Si Limu.

I wasn't checking for any of them until they were in Marvel.

Marvel made them stars. They're getting paid more for other roles due to becoming stars with Marvel.
It has to be about more than them getting paid more for other roles though.

No one is going to see Chris Evans movies.

Hemsworth isn't putting asses in seats.

Blackhat
The Huntsman
Bad Times at the El Royale
MIB: International with Tessa Thompson

No one cared about those movies.
 

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
64,513
Reputation
13,765
Daps
263,367
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
Huh
That's not even the point they made
He would have a point if movies that weren't just "characters" were consistently competing with the MCU. Amsterdam was full of movie stars and someone like Taylor Swift who just broke Ticketmaster. He's acting like "movie stars" means something when it doesn't. It's a whole nothing ass argument.
 

semicko82

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
31,359
Reputation
5,394
Daps
90,692
Reppin
NULL
He would have a point if movies that weren't just "characters" were consistently competing with the MCU. Amsterdam was full of movie stars and someone like Taylor Swift who just broke Ticketmaster. He's acting like "movie stars" means something when it doesn't. It's a whole nothing ass argument.
That wasn't his point though.
 

DatNkkaCutty

Veteran
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
12,577
Reputation
4,619
Daps
82,527
Reppin
@ PA
I semi agree...but you can't tell me this dude can't act.....

3480659b6eb49c4e93d0f3cc3e4f16e1.gif


Michael Fassbender (Magneto) is a GREAT actor, and was stealin scenes, the second he was incorporated into the Marvel universe. Of course Magneto is a revered character/villain, but dudes acting ability, still shined thru. I would say the the same about Robert Downey Jr. Dude is such a good actor, he's become Tony Starks, IRL to some folks. That's not just the character. :yeshrug:

I wouldn't say the same can be said, for every character, but there are exceptions to the rule. That aside, I mostly agree wit Tarantino's assessment. Maybe the need to incorporate better actors, into some of these character roles.
 

jwinfield

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,403
Reputation
8,651
Daps
201,840
Reppin
NULL
That aside, I mostly agree wit Tarantino's assessment. Maybe the need to incorporate better actors, into some of these character roles.
You can get the best actors in the history to play these superhero roles, but if audiences aren't checking for them when they aren't playing the superhero, are they a star?
 

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
64,513
Reputation
13,765
Daps
263,367
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
That wasn't his point though.
That is his point. He's complaining that the MCU actors are just plug and play and that it's just a system, like a college quarterback being a system QB. Usually systems can only do so well, and truly talented players (in this cast truly talented actors) should be able to shyt all over the MCU and fukk them box offices up. Amsterdam is an example of a movie full of star power and that bytch went brick. Star power doesn't mean shyt. Complaining about well it's the characters not the actors...like well get you some characters and ADJUST TO THE TIMES.
 

Luke Cage

Coffee Lover
Supporter
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
49,687
Reputation
17,966
Daps
255,691
Reppin
Harlem
That is his point. He's complaining that the MCU actors are just plug and play and that it's just a system, like a college quarterback being a system QB. Usually systems can only do so well, and truly talented players (in this cast truly talented actors) should be able to shyt all over the MCU and fukk them box offices up. Amsterdam is an example of a movie full of star power and that bytch went brick. Star power doesn't mean shyt. Complaining about well it's the characters not the actors...like well get you some characters and ADJUST TO THE TIMES.
Facts
 

Bubba T

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 24, 2015
Messages
8,619
Reputation
2,729
Daps
55,013
QT makes a vaild point. Who are the box office stars these days?
 

BigBlackSea

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
1,473
Reputation
420
Daps
5,853
Actors today are beholden to the IP held by the studios (Captain America) or their self made brand (Dewayne Johnson, Ryan Reynolds, and Chris Pratt playing the same role, Tom Cruise as the "does his own stunts".)

The latter is evolution of the movie star/actor, whereas we had types like Daniel Day-Lewis and Marlon Brando who would pull just off the strength of the diversity of theirvroles in each of their movies, nowadays you know what you going to get when you see a Chris Pratt movie. It's the commidification of Hollywood. In order to pull a profit, you're rewarded for sticking to a formula that had proven valid in the past. No one wants to risk money on an "off the beaten path" project that could bomb and kill the studio. Plus there's the added benefit of film companies having more control over IPs as opposed to actors, especially in the social media age.

The Rock could probably finance his own film and original IP. Tom Cruise basically did it with Top Gun. That arrangement can leave a studio ass out of money, especially if a movie star has a massive social media presence. So it's better to have the IP of Captain America, and just change actors to ensure they have the means to keep using the IP for as long as they want. If you look at how these actors are faring after Marvel, it looks bleak. What was the last movie you can remember that had Tom Holland, Chris Evans, or RDJ.

RDJ did Doolittle, which bombed.

Holland did Uncharted, which I think dud good solely off the principle that it was another established IP.

Evans did some Netflix thing.

We're probably going to see something similar to the music industry owning people masters, where the film industry will own the rights to an actor's likeness and voice.

Actor dies? Recast. Actor goes mask off in racist tirade? Recast? Actor wants more money? Recast.
 

SchoolboyC

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
22,696
Reputation
3,977
Daps
96,285
Tom Cruise says hi. Top Gun or mission impossible starring Chris Evans or hemsworth would go double wood :mjlol:

Tom Cruise is one of the few box office draws left but even still there’s limits. Top Gun Maverick didn’t dominate the box office just because he was in it.

I think if Chris Evans were to star in a M:I spinoff and it was of comparable quality to the Cruise flicks it would still put up good numbers, no different from the Jeremy Renner Bourne flick :manny:
 
Top