Taraji P. Henson Reveals She Was Paid $150,000 for Oscar-Nominated Role & Took Home Only $30,000

2 one 3

wavy
Joined
Nov 11, 2017
Messages
6,357
Reputation
1,700
Daps
48,462
Reppin
Westside
This is dumb as fukk.

If you don’t understand why Jeff Bezos barely pays taxes but an actress does, you probably shouldn’t comment on it.

If you want to keep your tax money, build a corporation, buy real estate, have your money in stocks or other investments, etc. If you want to get paid and give Uncle Sam a large stake of your money, be an employee. The game is rigged, sure, but it’s not rigged secretly. The government makes it known 100% what they want you to do in order to not have to give the IRS all of your money.



shut up lil nikka


The fact that their are billionaires in the world is disgusting enough
 

Jblaze204

All Star
Joined
Jul 2, 2018
Messages
3,334
Reputation
422
Daps
9,454
Reppin
Uptown NY
She continued, “OK, so let’s break it down like this: You have twelve months in a year to make your money right. If you do a film for five months that takes you off the market for anything else or any other kind of coin until you’re done with that show,” she further explained.

if she couldn't work in other projects for 5 months, that's pretty foul. i only remember her being in a few scenes in Benjamin Button. i understand brad pitt and the old australian lady as leads not being able to work on other projects
 

mobbinfms

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 10, 2012
Messages
37,335
Reputation
15,400
Daps
93,676
Reppin
TPC
When you start making that kind of money Uncle Sam takes 50 percent, so let’s do the math,”
Marginal tax rate on $150,000 in 07-08 was 28%. Not to mention that she would have paid significantly less tax on the first $75,000 in income.
 

SheWantTheD

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
39,511
Reputation
2,015
Daps
97,938
Source: The Hollywood Reporter

EMPIRE: Terence Howard and Taraji P. Henson started out earning between $110,000 and $120,000 per episode, but were elevated to the $225,000-$250,000 range in 2016.
Exactly, so she probably took this role as an accolade despite the terrible payment
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
54,162
Reputation
11,545
Daps
367,944
Reppin
CHICAGO
Are you going to throw the bag at an actress for a 20 minute role whose biggest hit is a supporting role in a movie that only made $28 million?

I’m not sure I’d consider Hustle and Flow a breakout role if it took her another 5-6 years to find mainstream success after the fact.
YOU KEEP TRYING TO
DISMISS THE ROLE LIKE
SHE DIDNT GET NOMINATED
FOR AN OSCAR.



:devil:
:evil:
 

Magic Mulatto

Here Today, Gone Tomorrow. . .
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
6,358
Reputation
1,380
Daps
14,946
I ain’t never finna see the kinda money be talked about ITT in my life…
:mjcry:
 
  • Dap
Reactions: jeh

Geek Nasty

Brain Knowledgeably Whizzy
Supporter
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
30,215
Reputation
4,451
Daps
114,067
Reppin
South Kakalaka
You can blame the government for that as they create the loopholes that allow the rich and wealthy to dodge taxes. It’s why it’s laughable that people think that the rich will ever pay their fair share.

If people get back to that pro labor, keep-a-foot-on-a-rich-man's-neck attitude they used to have they would. We used to have a 90% tax rate to discourage corporations from overpaying CEOs.
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,125
Reputation
14,319
Daps
200,250
Reppin
Above the fray.
Just watched the OP video. She directly addressed (and educated) people who misconstrued an old comment where she complained about making 150K for the role in the Benjamin Button film.
The blog-osphere and twitter-verse only reads headlines and watch short video clips. She addressed them calling her "greedy". They tried to Latrell Sprewell her ."I got mouths to feed"

The Internet is something else.
 
Last edited:

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
64,639
Reputation
15,757
Daps
283,195
If people get back to that pro labor, keep-a-foot-on-a-rich-man's-neck attitude they used to have they would. We used to have a 90% tax rate to discourage corporations from overpaying CEOs.

And Corporations STILL dodged paying those taxes when it was 90% :dead::dead::dead:


Y'all been hoodwinked by the media and government to this raising taxes effects the rich

Been saying it, raising taxes is the most useless and inefficient way to extract profits away from Billion dollar corporations
 

Geek Nasty

Brain Knowledgeably Whizzy
Supporter
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
30,215
Reputation
4,451
Daps
114,067
Reppin
South Kakalaka
And Corporations STILL dodged paying those taxes when it was 90% :dead::dead::dead:


Y'all been hoodwinked by the media and government to this raising taxes effects the rich

Been saying it, raising taxes is the most useless and inefficient way to extract profits away from Billion dollar corporations
What am I missing? AFAIK corporations never bothered paying salaries in those ranges.
 

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
64,639
Reputation
15,757
Daps
283,195
What am I missing? AFAIK corporations never bothered paying salaries in those ranges.


Most billionaire CEOs don't get paid salaries. They know it's not tax friendly. Most of them get paid $1 a year. And no that's not a typo

They get most of their money through stock options, real estate, and overseas accounts. Because they have the money and resources to do so. Government making taxes higher doesn't effect them
 
Top