...and some waffle fries
Superstar
Think of not voting like going to a restaurant and telling the waiter to "just surprise you", sure it might work out and you might get something you like. On the other hand, you may not get something you like, or even if it is a type of food you may like the chefs skill in actually cooking the food come into play.
Additionally, say you have a peanut allergy and the chef sends out ice cream with Reese's cups for desserts. Or you can't tolerate gluten and the chef serves you a wheat based dish. These are possibilities you could avoid by actually putting in an order rather than just rolling the dice.
Your one vote may seem like nothing in a pool of millions, but some precincts come down to margins of less than 100 regularly. If people don't vote there is a high percentage chance that their children won't vote. But look what happened when millions of people decided not to vote, a coalition was able to get their Presidential candidate in much easier because of individuals making the choice not to vote. Trump had one of the lowest winning % since Carter.
At local levels this is even more relevant.
Kaep had every right to not vote. What he did imo that was wrong was revealing that he did not vote. He is under a heavy microscope and he HAS a platform to be able to affect change in other ways. People like you and me don't have that kind of platform. Voting is the most effective way that most everyday people can impact the political process! But just from posters on here you can see that Kaep revealing he didn't vote has embolden others who also didn't vote. Little kids see that and think "Well if Kaep didn't vote I don't need to either", but not connecting the dots that he has influence that they will never have.
Wrong. Terrible analogies. No such thing as a bloodless revolution.