Nah I'm not allowing that. What you're doing is the same shyt Kobe heads do, using the fact that Kobe won twice without Shaq to reinvent the real time sentiment of when Kobe and Shaq were together...
Shaq was not just the best player on the team in their run, he was arguably the best player on ball period, that's who Bean was playing with. We're not re-imagining the real time perspective just because Kobe later won two without Shaq, the years with Shaq still actually happened...
And we not reimagining the real time sentiment of the KD/Steph run just because Steph won twice without Durant. When they were together the prevailing sentiment was that Durant was the Warriors best player. I'm not with this revisionist shyt...
This isn't reimagining
The Warriors literally played better with Curry and KD off than with KD on and Curry odd
Real time the sentiment wasn't that universal - plenty of people still viewed that as Steph's team.
The offense ran through Steph... the same way the Lakers ran through Shaq.
What "alpha"/true number 1 doesn't even have their team's offense run through him?
It's not up for debate. KD himself literally jokingly called himself the servant for a reason - it was still Steph's offense. KD was meant to replace Harrison Barne's role of being a 2 way scoring wing... a role that Wiggins then replaced.
If Wiggins were to averaged 26 this finals and won Finals MVP... would that make Wiggins the number 1 option?
Like cmon cuz, this isn't even hating on KD. KD literally want their because of the offense they ran - they didn't rebuild it around him, they just plugged him in. At worst it's an even between the two