SPIRITS WALKING AROUND AND TALKING TO DEMONS?!
nikka.
STOP.
This shyt is just c00nery right now.
For somebody so well-versed in argumentation, that's a pretty terrible retort...
SPIRITS WALKING AROUND AND TALKING TO DEMONS?!
nikka.
STOP.
This shyt is just c00nery right now.
Look.
The brain can fuse memories and experiences to create experiences in lieu of actual stimuli causing those experiences...THAT DOESNT MEAN YOU DID THOSE THINGS.
This is interesting. I know what napoleon is saying. You can induce religious experience by turning off part of the brain with TMS. But can emotions change neurology? We don't know enough to answer that I don't think, from a scientific standpointWhat this comes down to is whether thoughts, emotions, and perceptions are a result of neural activity,
Or if neural activity is a response to thoughts, emotions and perceptions.
Absolutely one, or the other, or a combination of both.
I mean we both are saying perceptions can change how you view "reality". Some learn from that. Others don't. Your loss
For somebody so well-versed in argumentation, that's a pretty terrible retort...
You can bold the text all youd like, but you still havent answered the question I posed to you, but judging from your other responses I doubt you ever will so this is fruitless.who gives a fukk what your emotions are though?
aren't you interested in confirming the legitimacy of these claims or are you just trying to have an uninterrupted circlejerk and race to the bottom of ridiculous claims.
You nikkas don't even know how flawed the arguments are, yet you're so inspired to wanna believe its true since you'll think you'll be "the first" to discover something or that "real science" is keeping you down or some bullshyt. Its a massive attempt at subverting the process of confirmation in favor of the same logic you employ in the rest of your daily working life.
YesWhat this comes down to is whether thoughts, emotions, and perceptions are a result of neural activity,
Or if neural activity is a response to thoughts, emotions and perceptions.
Absolutely one, or the other, or a combination of both.
language is just one tool of communication. Who the fukk cares what it is called. Let's call these demons XHCYGH67. Does that make it better for you? I think you're stuck on your own perceptions of what "demon" meansHOLD
THE
fukk
UP
What sort of respectable "RETORT" are you gonna get to nikkas proclaiming their experiences with DEMONS son.
DEMONS
Man...tell me ya'll are joking right now.
you didn't ask a question.You can bold the text all youd like, but you still havent answered the question I posed to you, but judging from your other responses I doubt you ever will so this is fruitless.
Yes
There is only evidence to support this.
this sentence implies "thoughts, emotions, perceptions" exist outside of the stimuli they induce.
there is NO evidence of this.
Not that its wrong, but there is NO evidence of this.
NONE
There is evidence only supporting the former, not the latter.
language is just one tool of communication. Who the fukk cares what it is called. Let's call these demons XHCYGH67. Does that make it better for you? I think you're stuck on your own perceptions of what "demon" means
Its not wrong. I stand 100% firmly behind the evidence and established science.Wrong.
HOLD
THE
fukk
UP
What sort of respectable "RETORT" are you gonna get to nikkas proclaiming their experiences with DEMONS son.
DEMONS
Man...tell me ya'll are joking right now.
Oh so not only is your reality the only true one, but so is your definition of demon.nikka fukk all this goal-post moving.
If you use the term 'demon" you know exact what the fukk you're saying.
Do you SERIOUSLY believe you're interacting with demons out here?
Get. fukking. Real.
Its not wrong. I stand 100% firmly behind the evidence and established science.