Spider-Man Coming Home to Marvel Cinematic Universe

Norrin Radd

To me, my board!
Joined
Jun 9, 2013
Messages
47,464
Reputation
9,700
Daps
218,271
Reppin
Zenn-La
tumblr_njkl53VwSc1qjmus3o4_400.gif
tumblr_njkl53VwSc1qjmus3o1_400.gif

tumblr_njkl53VwSc1qjmus3o2_400.gif
tumblr_njkl53VwSc1qjmus3o3_400.gif


:blessed:
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
62,462
Reputation
12,330
Daps
88,130
Reppin
CHICAGO
this kid in kingsman could be Petey.
I hope they get this cast right.
the superhero actor needs to be the alter ego expertly first in look/swag/execution.

Art Barr
 

Jazzy B.

Superstar
Joined
Aug 8, 2013
Messages
15,586
Reputation
2,303
Daps
56,036
a colab is NOT needed. its beneficial to both parties but EVERY SPIDERMAN MOVIE has been a financial sucess that is a FACT

Rank Title (click to view) Studio Worldwide Domestic / % Overseas / % Year
1 Spider-Man 3 Sony $890.9 $336.5 37.8% $554.3 62.2% 2007
2 Spider-Man Sony $821.7 $403.7 49.1% $418.0 50.9% 2002
3 Spider-Man 2 Sony $783.8 $373.6 47.7% $410.2 52.3% 2004
4 The Amazing Spider-Man Sony $757.9 $262.0 34.6% $495.9 65.4% 2012
5 The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Sony $709.0 $202.9 28.6% $506.1 71.4% 2014

vs captain america?

Rank Title (click to view) Studio Worldwide Domestic / % Overseas / % Year
1 Captain America: The Winter Soldier BV $714.8 $259.8 36.3% $455.0 63.7% 2014
2 Captain America: The First Avenger Par. $370.6 $176.7 47.7% $193.9 52.3% 2011

vs thor?

Rank Title (click to view) Studio Worldwide Domestic / % Overseas / % Year
1 Thor: The Dark World BV $644.8 $206.4 32% $438.4 68% 2013
2 Thor Par. $449.3 $181.0 40.3% $268.3 59.7% 2011

vs ironman?

Rank Title (click to view) Studio Worldwide Domestic / % Overseas / % Year
1 Iron Man 3 BV $1,215.4 $409.0 33.7% $806.4 66.3% 2013
2 Iron Man 2 Par. $623.9 $312.4 50.1% $311.5 49.9% 2010
3 Iron Man Par. $585.2 $318.4 54.4% $266.8 45.6% 2008

basically the only mavel single charactor movie to TOUCH ANY spiderman movie was garbage ass ironman 3 and ASM2 = WINTER SOLDIER

so

please tell me who needed that stimulus package

We're talking about "Spider-Man", not "Thor", "Captain America" or character X.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 was the lowing grossing Spider-Man entry(both made less than the originals and cost more) and was panned critically. The movie had a $200M+ production budget and $200M+ marketing budget and failed to recoup it's costs. Sony sold off their Merchandise rights back to Marvel years ago, so there's no money coming in from that. If the franchise was successful financially then why the fukk would they reboot it again after just 2 and a half years?:mjlol: that must be record time for a reboot:wow:. They're letting Marvel Studios handle the character and make the next batch of Spider-Man movies for them because Spider-Man franchise has ran into the ground by the likes of Ari Avad. They need to reinvigorate the character and franchise and what better way do it by including the rebooted version character in a movie and universe with The Avengers - the hottest comic book property in town right now. Marvel Studios didn't really need this at all, their movies have been printing money without their flagship characters and will probably continue to do so.

Even the execs didn't like the last movie, the emails are out there, so miss with the straw grasping bs:camby:
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
62,462
Reputation
12,330
Daps
88,130
Reppin
CHICAGO
its over for them fukk boys and their stans
2ro6p36.jpg


we won :blessed:


all real africans still want this breh :mjcry: the streets been waiting on her to get her proper shine


dc, is dead in these streets.
plus, they cast Affleck as batman.
like they are sabotaging batman in the schumaker era all over again.

Art Barr
 

Ed MOTHEREFFING G

Chances make champions
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
15,899
Reputation
3,865
Daps
56,599
Reppin
206 x 734
We're talking about "Spider-Man", not "Thor", "Captain America" or character X.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 was the lowing grossing Spider-Man entry(both made less than the originals and cost more) and was panned critically. The movie had a $200M+ production budget and $200M+ marketing budget and failed to recoup it's costs.
again, patently false
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
62,462
Reputation
12,330
Daps
88,130
Reppin
CHICAGO
We're talking about "Spider-Man", not "Thor", "Captain America" or character X.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 was the lowing grossing Spider-Man entry(both made less than the originals and cost more) and was panned critically. The movie had a $200M+ production budget and $200M+ marketing budget and failed to recoup it's costs. Sony sold off their Merchandise rights back to Marvel years ago, so there's no money coming in from that. If the franchise was successful financially then why the fukk would they reboot it again after just 2 and a half years?:mjlol: that must be record time for a reboot:wow:. They're letting Marvel Studios handle the character and make the next batch of Spider-Man movies for them because Spider-Man franchise has ran into the ground by the likes of Ari Avad. They need to reinvigorate the character and franchise and what better way do it by including the rebooted version character in a movie and universe with The Avengers - the hottest comic book property in town right now. Marvel Studios didn't really need this at all, their movies have been printing money without their flagship characters and will probably continue to do so.

Even the execs didn't like the last movie, the emails are out there, so miss with the straw grasping bs:camby:

how are we going to take some execs word for it.
When, these same gooflames made Sam raimi purposefully ruin spidey III.
the master of the b movie at that.
you must have never seen a corporate coup.
or have one really affect your life to believe all that.


Art Barr
 

The Mad Titan

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
48,044
Reputation
12,745
Daps
126,567
Everyone knows this.... even Time.

The boy Donald about to be spiderman

http://time.com/3703175/donald-glover-next-spider-man/

In some ways, Donald Glover is almost too obvious a choice to play Peter Parker. Glover’s public persona of the sorta-nerdy-sorta-shy-often-misunderstood-and-under-appreciated-but-totally-brilliant guy is just about as Parker-esque as it gets in the acting world. It probably helps that Glover isn’t really an actor per se, but an artist, in the most 21st-century sense of the word — someone whose goal is to make cool, thoughtful art, regardless of the medium. It could be acting, it could be rapping, it could be writing, it could be graphic design; sometimes it’s a combination of all those things. Glover has never aspired to be just one thing — he wants to be as many things as he can be.
 

wire28

Blade said what up
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
48,746
Reputation
11,882
Daps
179,574
Reppin
#ByrdGang #TheColi
Would have liked an actual finish to the ASM series :aicmon: I hate unfinished shyt like that. Series just got rebooted :snoop:

Yall looking at this as a good thing, but an over abundance of star superheroes is not good. You need a balance. You need the first class, all star, most popular heroes (Iron Man, Capt) and the also popular but not as popular heroes (Hulk, Thor, etc). Spidey is too much star power and eventually the quality will have to drop In order to make everything fit and to,give everyone screen time.

If anything, they should have started another universe entirely. Consisting of the The New Avengers. (Maybe Luke Cage, Spidey, Echo, DareDevil) and Fantastic 4 that they've started, Black Panther etc. all In the future or something. Set in 2040 following the events of the avengers and the OG MCU. That would have made sense and they could have played around with foreshadowing in the MCU now, while giving subtle hints to the past in the new MCU. it would have given them a chance to do something special artistically. Creating a future and watching new age heroes adjust to a newer time.

I don't like this move at all.

they giving us too much piffery :why:

:umad:

wb/dc readin the news like :sadcam:"is it too late to write harry potter into justice league?"
:dead:
 
Last edited:

Norrin Radd

To me, my board!
Joined
Jun 9, 2013
Messages
47,464
Reputation
9,700
Daps
218,271
Reppin
Zenn-La
Everyone knows this.... even Time.

The boy Donald about to be spiderman

http://time.com/3703175/donald-glover-next-spider-man/
The next step for Sony, of course, is to recast Spider-Man. The studio is looking to go back to Spidey’s roots and put the character back in high school, which would require it to cast a younger actor, Variety has learned. Andrew Garfield is no longer playing the character.

http://variety.com/2015/film/news/details-spider-man-appear-in-sony-and-marvel-movies-1201429039/
 

Mortal1

Superstar
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Messages
13,007
Reputation
3,170
Daps
42,047
Reppin
The Bay Area
I have a strong feeling JK Simmons will be coming back to play JJ he's been hinting at it recently before this news broke out plus he already plays JJ on the Ultimate Spider-man cartoon which Marvel produces.
 

MartyMcFly

What's up doc, can we rock?
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
59,888
Reputation
9,170
Daps
160,981
Reppin
P.G. County
Top