So @sccit is an open zionist on a black hip hop forum?

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

either way, I still don’t think the comparison is the same.

They're both comedic fiction.​

 

[Ish Gibor]

That's because you don't look at them like I do.​

How do you look at them? I haven't read them, you have. Explain what you mean. Is "the bell curve comedic fiction"?

 

[Goat poster]

More about the authors of the "bell curve"

Richard Herrnstein - Wikipedia

Charles Murray (political scientist) - Wikipedia

Spoiler: Sit tight… in this rollercoaster.

Yeah, Manhattan institute affiliated, right wing racists.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

How do you look at them?

Pseudoscience.​

 

[Goat poster]

They're both comedic fiction.​

But the books I referenced are written by actual Jewish people.

not some far right racist.

what makes those books “comedic fiction”

?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

But the books I referenced are written by actual Jewish people?

Jews aren't immune to pseudoscience.​

 

[Ish Gibor]

Pseudoscience.​

So the best seller book by Richard Herrnstein is pseudoscience? His book wasn't the first nor the last on like that. In fact his theory is well accepted within academic circles and spread in mainstream circles as well.

 

[Sccit]

The Invention of the Jewish People - Wikipedia

The Thirteenth Tribe - Wikipedia

2 books written by Non-Zionist Jews that everyone should read.

Koestler's book was praised by the neo-Nazi magazine The Thunderbolt as "the political bombshell of the century",[11] and it was enthusiastically supported by followers of the Christian Identity movement.[1][13] According to Jeffery Kaplan, The Thirteenth Tribe was "Identity's primary source for the Khazar theory"; they felt Koestler's book confirmed their own beliefs regarding Jews,[12][14] and sold it "through their mail order services".[12]Goldstein writes that "Koestler and the Khazar theory he advanced lives on in the fever swamps of the white nationalist movement".[15]Michael Barkun writes that Koestler was apparently "either unaware of or oblivious to the use anti-Semites had made of the Khazar theory since its introduction at the turn of the century."[12]

 

[Ish Gibor]

Koestler's book was praised by the neo-Nazi magazine The Thunderbolt as "the political bombshell of the century",[11] and it was enthusiastically supported by followers of the Christian Identity movement.[1][13] According to Jeffery Kaplan, The Thirteenth Tribe was "Identity's primary source for the Khazar theory"; they felt Koestler's book confirmed their own beliefs regarding Jews,[12][14] and sold it "through their mail order services".[12]Goldstein writes that "Koestler and the Khazar theory he advanced lives on in the fever swamps of the white nationalist movement".[15]Michael Barkun writes that Koestler was apparently "either unaware of or oblivious to the use anti-Semites had made of the Khazar theory since its introduction at the turn of the century."[12]

Someone on another side prosed a question to another person. The question asked was: "is Ivanka Trump a convert and a Semite?".

What do you think?

 

[Sccit]

Someone on another side prosed a question to another person. The question asked was: "is Ivanka Trump a convert and a Semite?".

What do you think?

CLEARLY A CONVERT

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

So the best seller book by Richard Herrnstein is pseudoscience? His book wasn't the first nor the last on like that. In fact his theory is well accepted within academic circles and spread in mainstream circles as well.

Pseudoscience sells. Ask Graham Hancock.

It isn't 'well-accepted'. Especially in the mainstream. Many support some of it's conclusions, most do not due to lack of evidence, methodological errors, and environmental factors being a more plausible explanation than genetics.

It's basically disguised scientific racism and, you're right, it ain't the first or the last (see Nicholas Wade), but it is pseudoscience.​

 

[Ish Gibor]

CLEARLY A CONVERT

It took that other person ages and still there was and is no response.

But do you consider her Semitic?

 

[Ish Gibor]

Pseudoscience sells. Ask Graham Hancock.

It isn't 'well-accepted'. Especially in the mainstream. Many support some of it's conclusions, most do not due to lack of evidence, methodological errors, and environmental factors being a more plausible explanation than genetics.

It's basically disguised scientific racism and, you're right, it ain't the first or the last (see Nicholas Wade), but it is pseudoscience.​

Of course there was a response to this. Nevertheless, policies have shown and show us that it was and is a well accepted theory. Things like Black poverty, police brutality etc. is a direct result of this acceptance.

Till this day and time we see scientific racism in academic journals.

 

[Sccit]

It took that other person ages and still there was and is no response.

But do you consider her Semitic?

DEPENDS HOW U DEFINE SEMITIC

 

[Goat poster]

Pseudoscience sells. Ask Graham Hancock.

It isn't 'well-accepted'. Especially in the mainstream. Many support some of it's conclusions, most do not due to lack of evidence, methodological errors, and environmental factors being a more plausible explanation than genetics.

It's basically disguised scientific racism and, you're right, it ain't the first or the last (see Nicholas Wade), but it is pseudoscience.​

So do you consider these writers Jewish versions of "c00ns" for espousing these beliefs/theories?