so if Jesus is "GOD"

[TransJenner]

I'm still about the whole trinity thing but I don't think God would send someone to hell because they believe Jesus is GOD

but then again Catholics worship Mary and statues so wouldn't they be saved too

 

[Everythingg]

In the preceding verses of Acts 4:12, verse 10, 11 Peter says the name of Jesus twice.

No. When Peter was talking (you know, because you believe the things in the bible actually happened right?) he didnt say "Jesus". What dont you get about this? There is no J in Peter's language so whenever he said the words that are in ENGLISH in your bible, he said them in Hebrew. And when he said the name to the crowd, and said by NO OTHER NAME shall people be saved, he said it in Hebrew. Not in English.. So how can you say "he says the name of Jesus twice" when theres no J?

"Jesus" is the cac's rendition of the true name. And along with the rendition of the true name, came their own rendition of the true way of life the Israelites followed. Thats what you follow. A rendition...

 

[Everythingg]

How many slaves do you know personally today



Exactly

Plenty of people are wage slaves or slaves to sin. And they think yelling "Jesus" up and down or trusting in that spirit will save them. When according to their bible, only by ONE name are people saved.. Guess you didnt want to address that...

 

[TransJenner]

Plenty of people are wage slaves or slaves to sin. And they think yelling "Jesus" up and down or trusting in that spirit will save them. When according to their bible, only by ONE name are people saved.. Guess you didnt want to address that...

I know people who take the Bible literal and go thru a lot of BS (and I mean a lot ) and yet at the end of the day they're still at peace


And what name

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

You telling me "Julius Africanus" (sounds very to me) legitimately came up with a date so close the dates of pagan festivals?

Lol @ wikipedia......
​

The whole question of the exact date of Christ’s birthday appears to have arisen only when Christian chronographers began writing their chronologies. Obviously, the birthday of Christ had to be established in such chronologies, and numerous dates were proposed.

~Sol Invictus, the Winter Solstice, and the Origins of Christmas (2009)

​

From the extant remains of his Chronographie, one can also infer that Africanus treated the day of the resurrection of Christ as the beginning of a new year of the world, as he seems to have put the Passion in AM 5531, whereas the resurrection, two days later, is already dated AM 5532. This indicates that Africanus, just like Hippolytus and the computist of 243, considered the world to have been created on 25 March and he may well have associated the same date with Christ's incarnation.

~Dating the Passion: The Life of Jesus and the Emergence of Scientific Chronology', p. 57 (2011)

Africanus' text is dated to the early 3rd Century CE. Christianity wasn't even legal in the Roman Empire until 317 CE.......almost 100 years later.
​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

And what name

He's a 'Sacred Namer' breh. They believe the name 'Jehovah' was invented in the 16th Century and is not the 'True' name of G-d.

Bet he brings up the names 'Drusius' and 'Peter Galatin' in-support of his 'theory'.
​

 

[TransJenner]

He's a 'Sacred Namer' breh. They believe the name 'Jehovah' was invented in the 16th Century and is not the 'True' name of G-d.

Bet he brings up the names 'Drusius' and 'Peter Galatin' in-support of his 'theory'.
​

Isn't he's true name like YHWH or some weird ass code

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Isn't he's true name like YHWH or some weird ass code

The Tetragrammaton. 4 Hebrew characters they were only supposed to say when in the Temple.

Outside the Temple, they used substitute names such as 'Lord', 'Adonai', etc.​

 

[Lamar Givens]

No. When Peter was talking (you know, because you believe the things in the bible actually happened right?) he didnt say "Jesus". What dont you get about this? There is no J in Peter's language so whenever he said the words that are in ENGLISH in your bible, he said them in Hebrew. And when he said the name to the crowd, and said by NO OTHER NAME shall people be saved, he said it in Hebrew. Not in English.. So how can you say "he says the name of Jesus twice" when theres no J?

"Jesus" is the cac's rendition of the true name. And along with the rendition of the true name, came their own rendition of the true way of life the Israelites followed. Thats what you follow. A rendition...

Please do not take this the wrong way, but is English your first language, because you appear to be very CONFUSED about how language works. I clearly laid out for you in a previous post the transliteration of words and their definitions. For example, in Spanish the word for pen is BOLIGRAFO. The transliteration of BOLIGRAFO in English is PEN.

PEN - ENGLISH
PEN - BOLIGRAFO (Spanish)
What is so difficult about this for you to grasp?

Please listen carefully, THE NEW TESTAMENT WAS WRITTEN, WRITTEN, WRITTEN, WRITTEN in Greek, the Hebrew word Joshua (Yehoshua) TRANSLITERATED in GREEK is JESUS (Iseous/Yehoshua).

This was way before ENGLISH was ever discovered. This is not difficult to understand man. You are making this intentionally difficult in an attempt to save your belief at any cost.

I will say it again, and I hope it keeps you up late at night until you contemplate seeking help when you realize whoever is feeding you this B.S. has played you like a filthy dildo. Please distance yourself away from the people feeding you this garbage.

 

[Everythingg]

I know people who take the Bible literal and go thru a lot of BS (and I mean a lot ) and yet at the end of the day they're still at peace

Whats your point exactly? To a muslim, they have peace. To a buddhist, the same. What does that have to do with the fact that blacks are putting trust in the whiteman's religion when they praise and worship a "Jesus" the same way cacs do?

And what name

Ever heard the saying do not throw whats holy to dogs? Not saying you're a dog, but Im sure they're around

 

[WaveMolecules]

I disagree with 99% of the shyt you post on this site.

But you have been 100% spot on in this thread.

Evolution is real.

I don't even necessarily identify as an atheist. I hope God exists.

But anyone who can say with 100% certainty that God either DOES or DOESN'T exist is arrogant.

We don't know. We probably won't know till we die.

 

[Everythingg]

Lol @ wikipedia......
​

​

​

Africanus' text is dated to the early 3rd Century CE. Christianity wasn't even legal in the Roman Empire until 317 CE.......almost 100 years later.
​

Bruh what is you even going on about? They were celebrating pagan holidays on or around the date before he "legitimately" came up with the Dec 25th date.So Im not buying that he "legitimately" came up with that date of his birth. More likely to buy it was a merge of paganism and Hebrew beliefs by cacs.

 

[Everythingg]

He's a 'Sacred Namer' breh. They believe the name 'Jehovah' was invented in the 16th Century and is not the 'True' name of G-d.

Bet he brings up the names 'Drusius' and 'Peter Galatin' in-support of his 'theory'.
​

Nobody said anything about Drusius or Peter Galatin But even if I did, they arent who Im placing my salvation in. So who cares what their names are? Now the God Im supposed to be worshiping? Yea thats completely different.

And Jehovah isnt the true name of the Most High. Common sense tells you that.

 

[TransJenner]

Whats your point exactly? To a muslim, they have peace. To a buddhist, the same. What does that have to do with the fact that blacks are putting trust in the whiteman's religion when they praise and worship a "Jesus" the same way cacs do?




Ever heard the saying do not throw whats holy to dogs? Not saying you're a dog, but Im sure they're around

It's not a white mans religion


I don't even believe in religion

 

[Everythingg]

Please do not take this the wrong way, but is English your first language, because you appear to be very CONFUSED about how language works. I clearly laid out for you in a previous post the transliteration of words and their definitions. For example, in Spanish the word for pen is BOLIGRAFO. The transliteration of BOLIGRAFO in English is PEN.

PEN - ENGLISH
PEN - BOLIGRAFO (Spanish)
What is so difficult about this for you to grasp?

Whats so hard for you to grasp that Peter said ONE NAME not three or multiple names that would branch out to every language there is. The one you call "Jesus" name had a meaning in the Hebrew that is LOST when you translate it to "iesous" then "Jesus". "Jesus" means nothing in english. Iesous, doesnt share the same meaning that the name in Hebrew did. So your "its transliterated" excuse falls flat. Hard to have a personal relationship when you think you can call him whatever it is you want

There is no meaning in the name of Iseous let alone "Jesus". But a pen is a pen in english and boligrafo is a pen in spanish. Yet the meaning of the name in Hebrew, didnt come along with the "transliteration" into Greek, and then English. So again your excuse falls flat..

Please listen carefully, THE NEW TESTAMENT WAS WRITTEN, WRITTEN, WRITTEN, WRITTEN in Greek, the Hebrew word Joshua (Yehoshua) TRANSLITERATED in GREEK is JESUS (Iseous/Yehoshua).

You still dont understand that the name wasnt "Joshua" nor was it Yehoshua..

This was way before ENGLISH was ever discovered. This is not difficult to understand man. You are making this intentionally difficult in an attempt to save your belief at any cost.

I will say it again, and I hope it keeps you up late at night until you contemplate seeking help when you realize whoever is feeding you this B.S. has played you like a filthy dildo. Please distance yourself away from the people feeding you this garbage.

Breh you think because you falsely claim superiority that you're right?

Your just another example of a breh (assuming you're even black that is) who has been taken over by the cac man's religion. Not even understanding that the way of life the cac man's religion was based off of, BELONGED TO YOUR PEOPLE (assuming your black).. Your false intellectual high horse aint fooling no one...